Matching Items (2)
Description
Most data cleaning systems aim to go from a given deterministic dirty database to another deterministic but clean database. Such an enterprise pre–supposes that it is in fact possible for the cleaning process to uniquely recover the clean versions of each dirty data tuple. This is not possible in many cases, where the most a cleaning system can do is to generate a (hopefully small) set of clean candidates for each dirty tuple. When the cleaning system is required to output a deterministic database, it is forced to pick one clean candidate (say the "most likely" candidate) per tuple. Such an approach can lead to loss of information. For example, consider a situation where there are three equally likely clean candidates of a dirty tuple. An appealing alternative that avoids such an information loss is to abandon the requirement that the output database be deterministic. In other words, even though the input (dirty) database is deterministic, I allow the reconstructed database to be probabilistic. Although such an approach does avoid the information loss, it also brings forth several challenges. For example, how many alternatives should be kept per tuple in the reconstructed database? Maintaining too many alternatives increases the size of the reconstructed database, and hence the query processing time. Second, while processing queries on the probabilistic database may well increase recall, how would they affect the precision of the query processing? In this thesis, I investigate these questions. My investigation is done in the context of a data cleaning system called BayesWipe that has the capability of producing multiple clean candidates per each dirty tuple, along with the probability that they are the correct cleaned version. I represent these alternatives as tuples in a tuple disjoint probabilistic database, and use the Mystiq system to process queries on it. This probabilistic reconstruction (called BayesWipe–PDB) is compared to a deterministic reconstruction (called BayesWipe–DET)—where the most likely clean candidate for each tuple is chosen, and the rest of the alternatives discarded.
ContributorsRihan, Preet Inder Singh (Author) / Kambhampati, Subbarao (Thesis advisor) / Liu, Huan (Committee member) / Davulcu, Hasan (Committee member) / Arizona State University (Publisher)
Created2013
Description
The concept of Linked Data is gaining widespread popularity and importance. The method of publishing and linking structured data on the web is called Linked Data. Emergence of Linked Data has made it possible to make sense of huge data, which is scattered all over the web, and link multiple heterogeneous sources. This leads to the challenge of maintaining the quality of Linked Data, i.e., ensuring outdated data is removed and new data is included. The focus of this thesis is devising strategies to effectively integrate data from multiple sources, publish it as Linked Data, and maintain the quality of Linked Data. The domain used in the study is online education. With so many online courses offered by Massive Open Online Courses (MOOC), it is becoming increasingly difficult for an end user to gauge which course best fits his/her needs.
Users are spoilt for choices. It would be very helpful for them to make a choice if there is a single place where they can visually compare the offerings of various MOOC providers for the course they are interested in. Previous work has been done in this area through the MOOCLink project that involved integrating data from Coursera, EdX, and Udacity and generation of linked data, i.e. Resource Description Framework (RDF) triples.
The research objective of this thesis is to determine a methodology by which the quality
of data available through the MOOCLink application is maintained, as there are lots of new courses being constantly added and old courses being removed by data providers. This thesis presents the integration of data from various MOOC providers and algorithms for incrementally updating linked data to maintain their quality and compare it against a naïve approach in order to constantly keep the users engaged with up-to-date data. A master threshold value was determined through experiments and analysis that quantifies one algorithm being better than the other in terms of time efficiency. An evaluation of the tool shows the effectiveness of the algorithms presented in this thesis.
Users are spoilt for choices. It would be very helpful for them to make a choice if there is a single place where they can visually compare the offerings of various MOOC providers for the course they are interested in. Previous work has been done in this area through the MOOCLink project that involved integrating data from Coursera, EdX, and Udacity and generation of linked data, i.e. Resource Description Framework (RDF) triples.
The research objective of this thesis is to determine a methodology by which the quality
of data available through the MOOCLink application is maintained, as there are lots of new courses being constantly added and old courses being removed by data providers. This thesis presents the integration of data from various MOOC providers and algorithms for incrementally updating linked data to maintain their quality and compare it against a naïve approach in order to constantly keep the users engaged with up-to-date data. A master threshold value was determined through experiments and analysis that quantifies one algorithm being better than the other in terms of time efficiency. An evaluation of the tool shows the effectiveness of the algorithms presented in this thesis.
ContributorsDhekne, Chinmay (Author) / Bansal, Srividya (Thesis advisor) / Bansal, Ajay (Committee member) / Sohoni, Sohum (Committee member) / Arizona State University (Publisher)
Created2016