Matching Items (3)
Filtering by

Clear all filters

168591-Thumbnail Image.png
Description
The simplicity of everyday living creates opportunities for leadership based on individually curated personal networks that have developed overtime through the act of living and personal experience. These networks are unique to individuals; however, when grouped, they share enough similarities with others in their proximal environment, thus, allowing for the

The simplicity of everyday living creates opportunities for leadership based on individually curated personal networks that have developed overtime through the act of living and personal experience. These networks are unique to individuals; however, when grouped, they share enough similarities with others in their proximal environment, thus, allowing for the formation of spontaneous self-organized groups, based on either a felt need, a shared history, a common goal, or combination of such. These leadership opportunities heed the call for action within their community because the felt need is proximal. This exploratory ethnographic case study investigates the nature of leadership within self-organized groups and how it differs from other forms of collective action. Participant interviews and observations were used to explore how individuals interpreted their roles in the group along with how they assessed and fulfilled a felt need within their community, and the different meanings of leadership in self-organized groups.
ContributorsKhalifa, Asmaa (Author) / Kirsch, Robert (Thesis advisor, Committee member) / Wallace, Lillian M (Committee member) / Castillo, Elizabeth (Committee member) / Arizona State University (Publisher)
Created2022
187630-Thumbnail Image.png
Description
In spite of the volume of theoretical attention paid to concepts of leadership, there has been little work investigating how assumptions included in concepts of organization have influenced work in the organizational leadership field. Specifically, the concept of exit from organizations, and individual post-exit relations with former groups, in particular,

In spite of the volume of theoretical attention paid to concepts of leadership, there has been little work investigating how assumptions included in concepts of organization have influenced work in the organizational leadership field. Specifically, the concept of exit from organizations, and individual post-exit relations with former groups, in particular, has seen little theory or empirical investigation. This article employs a critical literature review to show that assumptions inherent in concepts of organization, such as prioritizing efficiency and profit production, preclude organizational leadership theories from expanding upon concepts of exit. These assumptions begin with the Weberian concepts of Bureaucracy and continue today in studies of market exit and employee turnover. This review shows that these assumptions have restricted organizational studies research from expanding into additional fields and organizational types, such as religious, separatist, and political organizations. Additionally, this review points towards fruitful new areas of research, through an analysis of New Religious Movements as they apply to organizational leadership studies and the development of an improved survey for measuring turnover in organizations.
ContributorsFassbender, Eric Robert (Author) / Kirsch, Robert (Thesis advisor) / Wallace, Marie (Committee member) / Corlett, David (Committee member) / Arizona State University (Publisher)
Created2023
193005-Thumbnail Image.png
Description
Tracing the rich component of virtue/goodness episteme and its accompanying power systems through leadership discourse, this theoretical inquiry seeks to discover the ontological essence of the leadership phenomenon. Utilizing Foucauldian, Husserlian and Derridean theoretical lenses, the power systems of the virtue/goodness episteme begins with an inspection of how this key

Tracing the rich component of virtue/goodness episteme and its accompanying power systems through leadership discourse, this theoretical inquiry seeks to discover the ontological essence of the leadership phenomenon. Utilizing Foucauldian, Husserlian and Derridean theoretical lenses, the power systems of the virtue/goodness episteme begins with an inspection of how this key leadership qualifier of materializes in leadership discourse from Classical Greek to present day. Virtue’s accompanying power systems are analyzed through a Foucauldian lens of pastoral power and power/knowledge. A discussion of meaning-making within a semiotic theoretical locus follows, which leads to a phenomenological reduction and deconstruction of the leadership phenomenon, revealing a three-component leadership object that is micro-social, interdependent, and non-classical in structure. A discussion of examples from modern leadership discourse that align with the properties of the leadership object potential for further study ensues.
ContributorsHelming, Kelly J (Author) / Kirsch, Robert (Thesis advisor) / Aurora, S. R. (Committee member) / Hirshorn, Jessica (Committee member) / Arizona State University (Publisher)
Created2024