Matching Items (3)
Filtering by
- All Subjects: Probabilistic models
- All Subjects: Word Math problems
- Creators: Devarakonda, Murthy
Description
While in recent years deep learning (DL) based approaches have been the popular approach in developing end-to-end question answering (QA) systems, such systems lack several desired properties, such as the ability to do sophisticated reasoning with knowledge, the ability to learn using less resources and interpretability. In this thesis, I explore solutions that aim to address these drawbacks.
Towards this goal, I work with a specific family of reading comprehension tasks, normally referred to as the Non-Extractive Reading Comprehension (NRC), where the given passage does not contain enough information and to correctly answer sophisticated reasoning and ``additional knowledge" is required. I have organized the NRC tasks into three categories. Here I present my solutions to the first two categories and some preliminary results on the third category.
Category 1 NRC tasks refer to the scenarios where the required ``additional knowledge" is missing but there exists a decent natural language parser. For these tasks, I learn the missing ``additional knowledge" with the help of the parser and a novel inductive logic programming. The learned knowledge is then used to answer new questions. Experiments on three NRC tasks show that this approach along with providing an interpretable solution achieves better or comparable accuracy to that of the state-of-the-art DL based approaches.
The category 2 NRC tasks refer to the alternate scenario where the ``additional knowledge" is available but no natural language parser works well for the sentences of the target domain. To deal with these tasks, I present a novel hybrid reasoning approach which combines symbolic and natural language inference (neural reasoning) and ultimately allows symbolic modules to reason over raw text without requiring any translation. Experiments on two NRC tasks shows its effectiveness.
The category 3 neither provide the ``missing knowledge" and nor a good parser. This thesis does not provide an interpretable solution for this category but some preliminary results and analysis of a pure DL based approach. Nonetheless, the thesis shows beyond the world of pure DL based approaches, there are tools that can offer interpretable solutions for challenging tasks without using much resource and possibly with better accuracy.
Towards this goal, I work with a specific family of reading comprehension tasks, normally referred to as the Non-Extractive Reading Comprehension (NRC), where the given passage does not contain enough information and to correctly answer sophisticated reasoning and ``additional knowledge" is required. I have organized the NRC tasks into three categories. Here I present my solutions to the first two categories and some preliminary results on the third category.
Category 1 NRC tasks refer to the scenarios where the required ``additional knowledge" is missing but there exists a decent natural language parser. For these tasks, I learn the missing ``additional knowledge" with the help of the parser and a novel inductive logic programming. The learned knowledge is then used to answer new questions. Experiments on three NRC tasks show that this approach along with providing an interpretable solution achieves better or comparable accuracy to that of the state-of-the-art DL based approaches.
The category 2 NRC tasks refer to the alternate scenario where the ``additional knowledge" is available but no natural language parser works well for the sentences of the target domain. To deal with these tasks, I present a novel hybrid reasoning approach which combines symbolic and natural language inference (neural reasoning) and ultimately allows symbolic modules to reason over raw text without requiring any translation. Experiments on two NRC tasks shows its effectiveness.
The category 3 neither provide the ``missing knowledge" and nor a good parser. This thesis does not provide an interpretable solution for this category but some preliminary results and analysis of a pure DL based approach. Nonetheless, the thesis shows beyond the world of pure DL based approaches, there are tools that can offer interpretable solutions for challenging tasks without using much resource and possibly with better accuracy.
ContributorsMitra, Arindam (Author) / Baral, Chitta (Thesis advisor) / Lee, Joohyung (Committee member) / Yang, Yezhou (Committee member) / Devarakonda, Murthy (Committee member) / Arizona State University (Publisher)
Created2019
Description
Significance of real-world knowledge for Natural Language Understanding(NLU) is well-known for decades. With advancements in technology, challenging tasks like question-answering, text-summarizing, and machine translation are made possible with continuous efforts in the field of Natural Language Processing(NLP). Yet, knowledge integration to answer common sense questions is still a daunting task. Logical reasoning has been a resort for many of the problems in NLP and has achieved considerable results in the field, but it is difficult to resolve the ambiguities in a natural language. Co-reference resolution is one of the problems where ambiguity arises due to the semantics of the sentence. Another such problem is the cause and result statements which require causal commonsense reasoning to resolve the ambiguity. Modeling these type of problems is not a simple task with rules or logic. State-of-the-art systems addressing these problems use a trained neural network model, which claims to have overall knowledge from a huge trained corpus. These systems answer the questions by using the knowledge embedded in their trained language model. Although the language models embed the knowledge from the data, they use occurrences of words and frequency of co-existing words to solve the prevailing ambiguity. This limits the performance of language models to solve the problems in common-sense reasoning task as it generalizes the concept rather than trying to answer the problem specific to its context. For example, "The painting in Mark's living room shows an oak tree. It is to the right of a house", is a co-reference resolution problem which requires knowledge. Language models can resolve whether "it" refers to "painting" or "tree", since "house" and "tree" are two common co-occurring words so the models can resolve "tree" to be the co-reference. On the other hand, "The large ball crashed right through the table. Because it was made of Styrofoam ." to resolve for "it" which can be either "table" or "ball", is difficult for a language model as it requires more information about the problem.
In this work, I have built an end-to-end framework, which uses the automatically extracted knowledge based on the problem. This knowledge is augmented with the language models using an explicit reasoning module to resolve the ambiguity. This system is built to improve the accuracy of the language models based approaches for commonsense reasoning. This system has proved to achieve the state of the art accuracy on the Winograd Schema Challenge.
In this work, I have built an end-to-end framework, which uses the automatically extracted knowledge based on the problem. This knowledge is augmented with the language models using an explicit reasoning module to resolve the ambiguity. This system is built to improve the accuracy of the language models based approaches for commonsense reasoning. This system has proved to achieve the state of the art accuracy on the Winograd Schema Challenge.
ContributorsPrakash, Ashok (Author) / Baral, Chitta (Thesis advisor) / Devarakonda, Murthy (Committee member) / Anwar, Saadat (Committee member) / Arizona State University (Publisher)
Created2019
Description
Systematic Reviews (SRs) aim to synthesize the totality of evidence for clinical practice and are important in making clinical practice guidelines and health policy decisions. However, conducting SRs manually is a laborious and time-consuming process. This challenge is growing due to the increase in the number of databases to search and the papers being published. Hence, the automation of SRs is an essential task. The goal of this thesis work is to develop Natural Language Processing (NLP)-based classifiers to automate the title and abstract-based screening for clinical SRs based on inclusion/exclusion criteria. In clinical SRs, a high-sensitivity system is a key requirement. Most existing methods for SRs use binary classification systems trained on labeled data to predict inclusion/exclusion. While previous studies have shown that NLP-based classification methods can automate title and abstract-based screening for SRs, methods for achieving high-sensitivity have not been empirically studied. In addition, the training strategy for binary classification has several limitations: (1) it ignores the inclusion/exclusion criteria, (2) lacks generalization ability, (3) suffers from low resource data, and (4) fails to achieve reasonable precision at high-sensitivity levels. This thesis work presents contributions to several aspects of the clinical systematic review domain. First, it presents an empirical study of NLP-based supervised text classification and high-sensitivity methods on datasets developed from six different SRs in the clinical domain. Second, this thesis work provides a novel approach to view SR as a Question Answering (QA) problem in order to overcome the limitations of the binary classification training strategy; and propose a more general abstract screening model for different SRs. Finally, this work provides a new QA-based dataset for six different SRs which is made available to the community.
ContributorsParmar, Mihir Prafullsinh (Author) / Baral, Chitta (Thesis advisor) / Devarakonda, Murthy (Thesis advisor) / Riaz, Irbaz B (Committee member) / Arizona State University (Publisher)
Created2021