Matching Items (14)
Filtering by

Clear all filters

154976-Thumbnail Image.png
Description
Metal castings are selectively machined-based on dimensional control requirements. To ensure that all the finished surfaces are fully machined, each as-cast part needs to be measured and then adjusted optimally in its fixture. The topics of this thesis address two parts of this process: data translations and feature-fitting clouds of

Metal castings are selectively machined-based on dimensional control requirements. To ensure that all the finished surfaces are fully machined, each as-cast part needs to be measured and then adjusted optimally in its fixture. The topics of this thesis address two parts of this process: data translations and feature-fitting clouds of points measured on each cast part. For the first, a CAD model of the finished part is required to be communicated to the machine shop for performing various machining operations on the metal casting. The data flow must include GD&T specifications along with other special notes that may be required to communicate to the machinist. Current data exchange, among various digital applications, is limited to translation of only CAD geometry via STEP AP203. Therefore, an algorithm is developed in order to read, store and translate the data from a CAD file (for example SolidWorks, CREO) to a standard and machine readable format (ACIS format - *.sat). Second, the geometry of cast parts varies from piece to piece and hence fixture set-up parameters for each part must be adjusted individually. To predictively determine these adjustments, the datum surfaces, and to-be-machined surfaces are scanned individually and the point clouds reduced to feature fits. The scanned data are stored as separate point cloud files. The labels associated with the datum and to-be-machined (TBM) features are extracted from the *.sat file. These labels are further matched with the file name of the point cloud data to identify data for the respective features. The point cloud data and the CAD model are then used to fit the appropriate features (features at maximum material condition (MMC) for datums and features at least material condition (LMC) for TBM features) using the existing normative feature fitting (nFF) algorithm. Once the feature fitting is complete, a global datum reference frame (GDRF) is constructed based on the locating method that will be used to machine the part. The locating method is extracted from a fixture library that specifies the type of fixturing used to machine the part. All entities are transformed from its local coordinate system into the GDRF. The nominal geometry, fitted features, and the GD&T information are then stored in a neutral file format called the Constraint Tolerance Feature (CTF) Graph. The final outputs are then used to identify the locations of the critical features on each part and these are used to establish the adjustments for its setup prior to machining, in another module, not part of this thesis.
ContributorsRamnath, Satchit (Author) / Shah, Jami J. (Thesis advisor) / Davidson, Joseph (Committee member) / Hansford, Dianne (Committee member) / Arizona State University (Publisher)
Created2016
154942-Thumbnail Image.png
Description
Tolerance specification for manufacturing components from 3D models is a tedious task and often requires expertise of “detailers”. The work presented here is a part of a larger ongoing project aimed at automating tolerance specification to aid less experienced designers by producing consistent geometric dimensioning and tolerancing (GD&T). Tolerance specification

Tolerance specification for manufacturing components from 3D models is a tedious task and often requires expertise of “detailers”. The work presented here is a part of a larger ongoing project aimed at automating tolerance specification to aid less experienced designers by producing consistent geometric dimensioning and tolerancing (GD&T). Tolerance specification can be separated into two major tasks; tolerance schema generation and tolerance value specification. This thesis will focus on the latter part of automated tolerance specification, namely tolerance value allocation and analysis. The tolerance schema (sans values) required prior to these tasks have already been generated by the auto-tolerancing software. This information is communicated through a constraint tolerance feature graph file developed previously at Design Automation Lab (DAL) and is consistent with ASME Y14.5 standard.

The objective of this research is to allocate tolerance values to ensure that the assemblability conditions are satisfied. Assemblability refers to “the ability to assemble/fit a set of parts in specified configuration given a nominal geometry and its corresponding tolerances”. Assemblability is determined by the clearances between the mating features. These clearances are affected by accumulation of tolerances in tolerance loops and hence, the tolerance loops are extracted first. Once tolerance loops have been identified initial tolerance values are allocated to the contributors in these loops. It is highly unlikely that the initial allocation would satisfice assemblability requirements. Overlapping loops have to be simultaneously satisfied progressively. Hence, tolerances will need to be re-allocated iteratively. This is done with the help of tolerance analysis module.

The tolerance allocation and analysis module receives the constraint graph which contains all basic dimensions and mating constraints from the generated schema. The tolerance loops are detected by traversing the constraint graph. The initial allocation distributes the tolerance budget computed from clearance available in the loop, among its contributors in proportion to the associated nominal dimensions. The analysis module subjects the loops to 3D parametric variation analysis and estimates the variation parameters for the clearances. The re-allocation module uses hill climbing heuristics derived from the distribution parameters to select a loop. Re-allocation Of the tolerance values is done using sensitivities and the weights associated with the contributors in the stack.

Several test cases have been run with this software and the desired user input acceptance rates are achieved. Three test cases are presented and output of each module is discussed.
ContributorsBiswas, Deepanjan (Author) / Shah, Jami J. (Thesis advisor) / Davidson, Joseph (Committee member) / Ren, Yi (Committee member) / Arizona State University (Publisher)
Created2016
155798-Thumbnail Image.png
Description
Robotic joints can be either powered or passive. This work will discuss the creation of a passive and a powered joint system as well as the combination system being both powered and passive along with its benefits. A novel approach of analysis and control of the combination system

Robotic joints can be either powered or passive. This work will discuss the creation of a passive and a powered joint system as well as the combination system being both powered and passive along with its benefits. A novel approach of analysis and control of the combination system is presented.

A passive and a powered ankle joint system is developed and fit to the field of prosthetics, specifically ankle joint replacement for able bodied gait. The general 1 DOF robotic joint designs are examined and the results from testing are discussed. Achievements in this area include the able bodied gait like behavior of passive systems for slow walking speeds. For higher walking speeds the powered ankle system is capable of adding the necessary energy to propel the user forward and remain similar to able bodied gait, effectively replacing the calf muscle. While running has not fully been achieved through past powered ankle devices the full power necessary is reached in this work for running and sprinting while achieving 4x’s power amplification through the powered ankle mechanism.

A theoretical approach to robotic joints is then analyzed in order to combine the advantages of both passive and powered systems. Energy methods are shown to provide a correct behavioral analysis of any robotic joint system. Manipulation of the energy curves and mechanism coupler curves allows real time joint behavioral adjustment. Such a powered joint can be adjusted to passively achieve desired behavior for different speeds and environmental needs. The effects on joint moment and stiffness from adjusting one type of mechanism is presented.
ContributorsHolgate, Robert (Author) / Sugar, Thomas (Thesis advisor) / Artemiades, Panagiotis (Thesis advisor) / Berman, Spring (Committee member) / Mignolet, Marc (Committee member) / Davidson, Joseph (Committee member) / Arizona State University (Publisher)
Created2017
158735-Thumbnail Image.png
Description
Almost all mechanical and electro-mechanical products are assemblies of multiple parts, either because of requirements for relative motion, or use of different materials, shape/size differences. Thus, assembly design is the very crux of engineering design. In addition to nominal design of an assembly, there is also tolerance design to determine

Almost all mechanical and electro-mechanical products are assemblies of multiple parts, either because of requirements for relative motion, or use of different materials, shape/size differences. Thus, assembly design is the very crux of engineering design. In addition to nominal design of an assembly, there is also tolerance design to determine allowable manufacturing variations to ensure proper functioning and assemblability. Most of the flexible assemblies are made by stamping sheet metal. Sheet metal stamping process involves plastically deforming sheet metals using dies. Sub-assemblies of two or more components are made with either spot-welding or riveting operations. Various sub-assemblies are finally joined, using spot-welds or rivets, to create the desired assembly. When two components are brought together for assembly, they do not align exactly; this causes gaps and irregularities in assemblies. As multiple parts are stacked, errors accumulate further. Stamping leads to variable deformations due to residual stresses and elastic recovery from plastic strain of metals; this is called as the ‘spring-back’ effect. When multiple components are stacked or assembled using spot welds, input parameters variations, such as sheet metal thickness, number and order of spot welds, cause variations in the exact shape of the final assembly in its free state. It is essential to understand the influence of these input parameters on the geometric variations of both the individual components and the assembly created using these components. Design of Experiment is used to generate principal effect study which evaluates the influence of input parameters on output parameters. The scope of this study is to quantify the geometric variations for a flexible assembly and evaluate their dependence on specific input variables. The 3 input variables considered are the thickness of the sheet material, the number of spot welds used and the spot-welding order to create the assembly. To quantify the geometric variations, sprung-back nodal points along lines, circular arcs, a combination of these, and a specific profile are reduced to metrologically simulated features.
ContributorsJoshi, Abhishek (Author) / Ren, Yi (Thesis advisor) / Davidson, Joseph (Committee member) / Shah, Jami (Committee member) / Arizona State University (Publisher)
Created2020