General ecological thought pertaining to plant biology, conservation, and urban areas has rested on two potentially contradictory underlying assumptions. The first is that non-native plants can spread easily from human developments to “pristine” areas. The second is that native plants cannot disperse through developed areas. Both assume anthropogenic changes to ecosystems create conditions that favor non-native plants and hinder native species. However, it is just as likely that anthropogenic alterations of habitats will favor certain groups of plant species with similar functional traits, whether native or not. Migration of plants can be divided into the following stages: dispersal, germination, establishment, reproduction and spread. Functional traits of species determine which are most successful at each of the stages of invasion or range enlargement. I studied the traits that allow both native and non-native plant species to disperse into freeway corridors, germinate, establish, reproduce, and then disperse along those corridors in Phoenix, Arizona. Field methods included seed bank sample collection and germination, vegetation surveys, and seed trapping. I also evaluated concentrations of plant-available nitrate as a result of localized nitrogen deposition. While many plant species found on the roadsides are either landscape varieties or typical weedy species, some uncommon native species and unexpected non-native species were also encountered. Maintenance regimes greatly influence the amount of vegetative cover and species composition along roadsides. Understanding which traits permit success at various stages of the invasion process indicates whether it is native, non-native, or species with particular traits that are likely to move through the city and establish in the desert. In a related case study conducted in Victoria, Australia, transportation professionals and ecologists were surveyed regarding preferences for roadside landscape design. Roadside design and maintenance projects are typically influenced by different groups of transportation professionals at various stages in a linear project cycle. Landscape architects and design professionals have distinct preferences and priorities compared to other transportation professionals and trained ecologists. The case study reveals the need for collaboration throughout the stages of design, construction and maintenance in order to efficiently manage roadsides for multiple priorities.

Though cities occupy only a small percentage of Earth's terrestrial surface, humans concentrated in urban areas impact ecosystems at local, regional and global scales. I examined the direct and indirect ecological outcomes of human activities on both managed landscapes and protected native ecosystems in and around cities. First, I used highly managed residential yards, which compose nearly half of the heterogeneous urban land area, as a model system to examine the ecological effects of people's management choices and the social drivers of those decisions. I found that a complex set of individual and institutional social characteristics drives people's decisions, which in turn affect ecological structure and function across scales from yards to cities. This work demonstrates the link between individuals' decision-making and ecosystem service provisioning in highly managed urban ecosystems.

Second, I examined the distribution of urban-generated air pollutants and their complex ecological outcomes in protected native ecosystems. Atmospheric carbon dioxide (CO₂), reactive nitrogen (N), and ozone (O₃) are elevated near human activities and act as both resources and stressors to primary producers, but little is known about their co-occurring distribution or combined impacts on ecosystems. I investigated the urban "ecological airshed," including the spatial and temporal extent of N deposition, as well as CO₂ and O₃ concentrations in native preserves in Phoenix, Arizona and the outlying Sonoran Desert. I found elevated concentrations of ecologically relevant pollutants co-occur in both urban and remote native lands at levels that are likely to affect ecosystem structure and function. Finally, I tested the combined effects of CO₂, N, and O₃ on the dominant native and non-native herbaceous desert species in a multi-factor dose-response greenhouse experiment. Under current and predicted future air quality conditions, the non-native species (Schismus arabicus) had net positive growth despite physiological stress under high O₃ concentrations. In contrast, the native species (Pectocarya recurvata) was more sensitive to O₃ and, unlike the non-native species, did not benefit from the protective role of CO₂. These results highlight the vulnerability of native ecosystems to current and future air pollution over the long term. Together, my research provides empirical evidence for future policies addressing multiple stressors in urban managed and native landscapes.

Climate change is causing hydrologic intensification globally by increasing both the frequency and magnitude of floods and droughts. While environmental variation is a key regulator at all levels of ecological organization, such changes to the hydrological cycle that are beyond the normal range of variability can have strong impacts on stream and riparian ecosystems within sensitive landscapes, such as the American Southwest. The main objective of this study was to investigate how anomalous hydrologic variability influences macroinvertebrate communities in desert streams. I studied seasonal changes in aquatic macroinvertebrate abundances in eleven streams that encompass a hydrologic gradient across Arizona’s Sonoran Desert. This analysis was coupled with the quantification and assessment of stochastic hydrology to determine influences of flow regimes and discrete events on invertebrate community composition. I found high community variability within sites, illustrated by seasonal measures of beta diversity and nonmetric multidimensional scaling (NMDS) plots. I observed notable patterns of NMDS data points when invertebrate abundances were summarized by summer versus winter surveys. These results suggest that there is a difference within the communities between summer and winter seasons, irrespective of differences in site hydroclimate. Estimates of beta diversity were the best metric for summarizing and comparing diversity among sites, compared to richness difference and replacement. Seasonal measures of beta diversity either increased, decreased, or stayed constant across the study period, further demonstrating the high variation within and among study sites. Regime shifts, summarized by regime shift frequency (RSF) and mean net annual anomaly (NAA), and anomalous events, summarized by the power of blue noise (Maximum Blue Noise), were the best predictors of macroinvertebrate diversity, and thus should be more widely applied to ecological data. These results suggest that future studies of community composition in freshwater systems should focus on understanding the cause of variation in biodiversity gradients. This study highlights the importance of considering both flow regimes and discrete anomalous events when studying spatial and temporal variation in stream communities.