Matching Items (2)
Filtering by
Description
Gender discrimination and inequality in this day and age points to the existence of ambivalent sexist beliefs. That is, men and women hold outwardly negative or superficially positive sexist beliefs about the innate inferiority of women (Glick & Fiske, 1996; Glick & Fiske, 1997). In the past twenty years, outcomes and effects of women due to these beliefs have been researched extensively. Less common are suggestions or conclusions regarding the underlying existence of these beliefs, though many researchers have related their results to aspects within the Social Identity Theory (1979) and other alike theories involving the self and threats to self. The present study looks at smaller constructs, reporting a relationship between a model of women's identity, including predictors: 1) closeness to women, 2) public regard 3) gender identity centrality, to hostile, benevolent and ambivalent sexist beliefs. A group of N=115 women with ages ranging from 18 to 22 at Arizona State University were administered a survey asking questions about their sexist beliefs and their personal gender values. Results show a significant relationship between predictor variables to hostile sexist beliefs, but not benevolent sexist beliefs. These findings suggest that women's association with their gender-derived identity may parallel with endorsement of sexist beliefs when conceptions of the traditional woman is more salient.
ContributorsChavez, Adrienne Raschelle (Author) / Bradley, Robert (Thesis director) / McKenney, Sarah (Committee member) / Barrett, The Honors College (Contributor) / T. Denny Sanford School of Social and Family Dynamics (Contributor) / Department of Psychology (Contributor)
Created2014-05
Description
Academic tracking has long been a subject of debate due to its potential impact on educational equity, with students who are tracked highly receiving a higher quality
education in comparison to students tracked lowly. These disparities in education quality
may be affecting students’ outcomes, as it has been demonstrated that the short-term
academic outcomes of students, such as their grades, tend to be affected by their
academic track positioning. This dissertation builds upon these previous findings by
utilizing a subsample of 20,584 students from the High School Longitudinal Study (2009)
to examine the relation between academic track positioning and post-secondary education
attendance, program length, college major, and expected future job. Additionally, the
relation between academic tracking and each of these outcomes was also assessed using
mediation, with potential mediators including education aspiration, expectations, and
academic self-efficacy. Findings suggest that academic track positioning in math and
science are influential in students’ post-secondary and career outcomes, with students
who are positioned highly in either subject having greater post-secondary attendance,
program length, higher representation in STEM college majors, and expectations for
future jobs in STEM fields in comparison to students tracked lowly. Additionally,
education aspirations and expectations mediated the relations between math academic
track positioning and each of the outcomes, although the effects were small in size.
Educators should consider exploring avenues for improving education quality in low
academic tracks.
ContributorsWoods, Kenton Bentley (Author) / Hanish, Laura (Thesis advisor) / DeLay, Dawn (Committee member) / Martin, Carol (Committee member) / Jager, Justin (Committee member) / Arizona State University (Publisher)
Created2023