Matching Items (3)
168815-Thumbnail Image.png
Description
This research explores Western society’s inability to address climate change substantively and the pathology of modernity. This dissertation resulted in two deliverables: (1) a persuasive critical literature review that defined and framed the pathology of modernity, and (2) an autoethnography on the pathology of modernity. Paper one showed the connections

This research explores Western society’s inability to address climate change substantively and the pathology of modernity. This dissertation resulted in two deliverables: (1) a persuasive critical literature review that defined and framed the pathology of modernity, and (2) an autoethnography on the pathology of modernity. Paper one showed the connections linking climate change and colonization by drawing on political ecology, Indigenous studies, environmental justice, sociology, postcolonial studies, and decolonial studies. After building a case for Western society’s responsibility for climate change, depth psychology was used to examine why many of contemporary society’s Western leaders tend to deny or ignore climate change and related systemic issues. This mindset is proposed to be an expression of a societal illness I define as the pathology of modernity. In paper two, the pathology of modernity is described through an autoethnography of my community organizing. This research used both a decolonial methodology as well as was inspired by grounded theory. Methods for the deliverables included a critical argumentative literature review and autoethnography. This research intends to change the conversation around climate change, addressing the structural power-based issues and mentality in Western society that prevents climate justice and climate action.
ContributorsTekola, Sarra (Author) / Cloutier, Scott (Thesis advisor) / Swadener, Beth (Committee member) / Amira de la Garza, Sarah (Committee member) / Arizona State University (Publisher)
Created2022
190853-Thumbnail Image.png
Description
This dissertation research explores the complexity of transformations of academic lives and academic identities along the multiple, non-linear, conflicting, and paradoxical trajectories of the pre-Soviet, Soviet, and post-Soviet times and spaces. Academic literature on the post-Soviet transformations of higher education has usually focused on structural reforms and policy changes, as

This dissertation research explores the complexity of transformations of academic lives and academic identities along the multiple, non-linear, conflicting, and paradoxical trajectories of the pre-Soviet, Soviet, and post-Soviet times and spaces. Academic literature on the post-Soviet transformations of higher education has usually focused on structural reforms and policy changes, as well as their compatibility with the European and Western higher education policy agenda. Guided by the theoretical insights from the decolonial and post-Socialist transformation studies, this dissertation research intends to decenter the education policies and reforms from being a focal point of analysis; instead, it spotlights the transformation of Georgian academics through their memories, lived experiences, and imaginations about the future. The study offers insights into personal and collective experiences of being and becoming an academic in the process of navigating the evolving historical, political, cultural, and institutional contexts at three public universities in Georgia. Drawing on the narrative-ethnographic methodology, this study explores the complicated scenes and nuances of Georgian academic space by portraying how academics construct, reconstruct, adjust, resist, negotiate, and reinvent their academic selves during the post-Soviet transformations. Diffractive analysis of the narratives and ethnographic observations illustrates multiple intra-actions of academic identities through various temporal and spatial reconfigurations, revealing that the Soviet past is not left behind, and the European future is not that certain. Instead, the liminal academic space is haunted by the (re)awakened pasts and (re)imagined futures, and their inseparability enacts various co-existing scenarios of defuturing and refuturing of academic identities.
ContributorsTsotniashvili, Keti (Author) / Silova, Iveta (Thesis advisor) / Hailu, Meseret (Committee member) / Oleksiyenko, Anatoly (Committee member) / Fischman, Gustavo (Committee member) / Arizona State University (Publisher)
Created2023
187335-Thumbnail Image.png
Description
Higher education in Ethiopia has undergone significant expansion since the 1990s, with increases in the number of institutions, professors, and students. In the context of this rapid expansion, the Higher Diploma Program (HDP) was introduced to improve the quality of higher education by training university faculty in pedagogy and shifting

Higher education in Ethiopia has undergone significant expansion since the 1990s, with increases in the number of institutions, professors, and students. In the context of this rapid expansion, the Higher Diploma Program (HDP) was introduced to improve the quality of higher education by training university faculty in pedagogy and shifting pedagogy from teacher-centered to student-centered methods, specifically focusing on the introduction of Active Learning Methods (ALMs). This dissertation examines how the HDP was introduced and implemented in Ethiopian higher education through the theoretical lens of education policy transfer/borrowing and decolonial studies. Using ALMs as a case of a borrowed education policy, this research explores policy-practice gaps and factors hindering implementation of ALMs across different institutional and disciplinary contexts in Ethiopian higher education. Overall, the findings indicate that the HDP did not radically transform pedagogy and that teacher-centered instruction continues to dominate teaching and learning. Despite variations in institutional resources, geographical locations, or disciplinary contexts, ALMs were not commonly implemented. Drawing on the intensive analysis of quantitative and qualitative data, including over 150 faculty surveys, nearly 80 interviews with faculty (n=58), universities leaders (n=15), and policymakers (n=6), and 15 focus group discussions with 100 students, this research has identified barriers to the implementation of ALMs that exceed the often-cited factors such as large class sizes, lack of resources, overloaded curricula, lack of pedagogical knowledge, or a lack of faculty commitment. In addition to the previously documented barriers, this research has also identified the broader interconnected meso- and macro-level barriers related to the economy, politics, culture, and global/local dynamics that reflect the logic of coloniality through the continued influence of international donors using soft power (e.g., international aid, knowledge expertise, and international study tours). Combined, these findings suggest that the barriers to the implementation of ALMs in Ethiopia are rooted in systemic and complex power asymmetry between Ethiopia and the Global West/North, and therefore require not only technical assistance involving multiple sectors and stakeholders, but a radical reconfiguration of the modern/colonial logic that forms the foundation of the HDP and other borrowed education reforms.
ContributorsHalkiyo, Atota Bedane (Author) / Silova, Iveta (Thesis advisor) / Hailu, Meseret (Committee member) / Mlambo, Yeukai (Committee member) / Koro, Mirka (Committee member) / Arizona State University (Publisher)
Created2023