Alcohol use disorder is a major problem worldwide and can result in a number of significant physical, social and economic consequences. Specifically when comparing the prevalence of alcohol use disorders in the United States and Spain, it is much higher in the United States, at 13.9% compared with 1.5% in Spain. While there are a number of factors that contribute to a person’s risk, this thesis focuses on possible cultural explanations for these differences. After analyzing current literature surrounding alcohol trends and differing cultures in the US and Spain, the differences could be attributable to the dry drinking culture in the US, and the culture surrounding university - living and college towns in the US. The findings of this study suggest that culture, norms and attitudes surrounding drinking have a large impact on alcohol use disorder, and the US could benefit from implementing strategies to change these norms and attitudes surrounding alcohol, as well as train healthcare providers to have effective, brief counseling conversations.

This study aims to compare libel laws in the United States and the United Kingdom and discuss their modern implications and differences. Speech laws and protections are notably different in the U.S. and the UK, affecting how each country handles legal proceedings regarding libel and defamation suits. This report will explain these differences by looking at legal precedent and case examples in both countries. After comparing and contrasting legal doctrines in each country, I will analyze and apply the concepts to instances of political speech. Lastly, I will look at the intersection between libel laws and freedom of speech during elections and campaigns in both countries and review recent commentary regarding current libel laws in both countries.