Matching Items (2)
Filtering by
- Genre: Doctoral Dissertation
Description
Persistent self-assessment is the key to proficiency in computer programming. The process involves distributed practice of code tracing and writing skills which encompasses a large amount of training that is tailored for the student's learning condition. It requires the instructor to efficiently manage the learning resource and diligently generate related programming questions for the student. However, programming question generation (PQG) is not an easy job. The instructor has to organize heterogeneous types of resources, i.e., conceptual programming concepts and procedural programming rules. S/he also has to carefully align the learning goals with the design of questions in regard to the topic relevance and complexity. Although numerous educational technologies like learning management systems (LMS) have been adopted across levels of programming learning, PQG is still largely based on the demanding creation task performed by the instructor without advanced technological support. To fill this gap, I propose a knowledge-based PQG model that aims to help the instructor generate new programming questions and expand existing assessment items. The PQG model is designed to transform conceptual and procedural programming knowledge from textbooks into a semantic network model by the Local Knowledge Graph (LKG) and the Abstract Syntax Tree (AST). For a given question, the model can generate a set of new questions by the associated LKG/AST semantic structures. I used the model to compare instructor-made questions from 9 undergraduate programming courses and textbook questions, which showed that the instructor-made questions had much simpler complexity than the textbook ones. The analysis also revealed the difference in topic distributions between the two question sets. A classification analysis further showed that the complexity of questions was correlated with student performance. To evaluate the performance of PQG, a group of experienced instructors from introductory programming courses was recruited. The result showed that the machine-generated questions were semantically similar to the instructor-generated questions. The questions also received significantly positive feedback regarding the topic relevance and extensibility. Overall, this work demonstrates a feasible PQG model that sheds light on AI-assisted PQG for the future development of intelligent authoring tools for programming learning.
ContributorsChung, Cheng-Yu (Author) / Hsiao, Ihan (Thesis advisor) / VanLehn, Kurt (Committee member) / Sahebi, Shaghayegh (Committee member) / Bansal, Srividya (Committee member) / Arizona State University (Publisher)
Created2022
Description
While predicting completion in Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs) has been an active area of research in recent years, predicting completion in self-paced MOOCS, the fastest growing segment of open online courses, has largely been ignored. Using learning analytics and educational data mining techniques, this study examined data generated by over 4,600 individuals working in a self-paced, open enrollment college algebra MOOC over a period of eight months.
Although just 4% of these students completed the course, models were developed that could predict correctly nearly 80% of the time which students would complete the course and which would not, based on each student’s first day of work in the online course. Logistic regression was used as the primary tool to predict completion and focused on variables associated with self-regulated learning (SRL) and demographic variables available from survey information gathered as students begin edX courses (the MOOC platform employed).
The strongest SRL predictor was the amount of time students spent in the course on their first day. The number of math skills obtained the first day and the pace at which these skills were gained were also predictors, although pace was negatively correlated with completion. Prediction models using only SRL data obtained on the first day in the course correctly predicted course completion 70% of the time, whereas models based on first-day SRL and demographic data made correct predictions 79% of the time.
Although just 4% of these students completed the course, models were developed that could predict correctly nearly 80% of the time which students would complete the course and which would not, based on each student’s first day of work in the online course. Logistic regression was used as the primary tool to predict completion and focused on variables associated with self-regulated learning (SRL) and demographic variables available from survey information gathered as students begin edX courses (the MOOC platform employed).
The strongest SRL predictor was the amount of time students spent in the course on their first day. The number of math skills obtained the first day and the pace at which these skills were gained were also predictors, although pace was negatively correlated with completion. Prediction models using only SRL data obtained on the first day in the course correctly predicted course completion 70% of the time, whereas models based on first-day SRL and demographic data made correct predictions 79% of the time.
ContributorsCunningham, James Allan (Author) / Bitter, Gary (Thesis advisor) / Barber, Rebecca (Committee member) / Douglas, Ian (Committee member) / Arizona State University (Publisher)
Created2017