Description

This report explores the United States’ continued use of the death penalty and the various costs of maintaining such a policy. This paper aims to investigate issues in the continued use of the death penalty and potential policy alternatives to

This report explores the United States’ continued use of the death penalty and the various costs of maintaining such a policy. This paper aims to investigate issues in the continued use of the death penalty and potential policy alternatives to this inhumane practice. To this end, topics such as constitutional law, crime control, and economic costs associated with the death penalty will be explored. Ultimately, due to patterns of racial and economic discrimination, a lack of evidence for a deterrent effect, the risk imposed on innocent defendants, and the economic cost of maintaining the status quo, it is suggested that the United States, at the very least places a federal moratorium on executions, while simultaneously encouraging states to do the same through the use of grants or mandates designed to lessen the cost of swapping to a life without parole or LWOP system could create on a state’s budget. Additionally, alternatives such as LWOP are explored as a means to address many of the concerns surrounding the death penalty.

Reuse Permissions
  • 302.26 KB application/pdf

    Download restricted. Please sign in.
    Restrictions Statement

    Barrett Honors College theses and creative projects are restricted to ASU community members.

    Details

    Title
    • Executing the Death Penalty: A Policy Review of Our Most Severe Punishment
    Contributors
    Date Created
    2023-05
    Resource Type
  • Text
  • Machine-readable links