Description

In their criticism of various approaches to upbringing and related American family law jurisprudence, liberal theorists tend to underweight the interests of parents in directing the development of children’s values.

In their criticism of various approaches to upbringing and related American family law jurisprudence, liberal theorists tend to underweight the interests of parents in directing the development of children’s values. Considered through the lens of T.M. Scanlon’s contractualism, providing a good upbringing is not a matter of identifying children’s “best interests” or acting in accordance with overriding end-state principles.

760.69 KB application/pdf

Download count: 0

Details

Contributors
Date Created
  • 2019
Resource Type
  • Text
  • Collections this item is in
    Note
    • Partial requirement for: Ph.D., Arizona State University, 2019
      Note type
      thesis
    • Includes bibliographical references (pages 219-223)
      Note type
      bibliography
    • Field of study: Philosophy
    • Based on: Scanlon, Thomas. What we owe to each other

    Citation and reuse

    Statement of Responsibility

    by Kenneth Pike

    Machine-readable links