Description

This thesis is an art-historical inquiry into the National Endowment for the Arts (NEA) and its controversies in the 1990s. A socio-economic model of instrumentalization of the arts based on

This thesis is an art-historical inquiry into the National Endowment for the Arts (NEA) and its controversies in the 1990s. A socio-economic model of instrumentalization of the arts based on Pierre Bourdieu's and David Throsby's conceptualizations of cultural capital is first developed. The model is then used to explore the notion of "congressional aesthetics," or a particular brand of arts-instrumentalization adopted by the U.S. Congress for post-WWII federal projects involving art, and two cases of its implementation.

Reuse Permissions
  • 1.11 MB application/pdf

    Download count: 0

    Details

    Contributors
    Date Created
    • 2015
    Resource Type
  • Text
  • Collections this item is in
    Note
    • Partial requirement for: M.A., Arizona State University, 2015
      Note type
      thesis
    • Includes bibliographical references (pages 90-105)
      Note type
      bibliography
    • Field of study: Art

    Citation and reuse

    Statement of Responsibility

    by Gordon Shockley

    Machine-readable links