Description
ABSTRACT Research on self-control theory (Gottfredson & Hirschi, 1990) consistently supports its' central proposition that low self-control significantly affects crime. The theory includes other predictions, which have received far less empirical scrutiny. Among these is the argument that self-control is

ABSTRACT Research on self-control theory (Gottfredson & Hirschi, 1990) consistently supports its' central proposition that low self-control significantly affects crime. The theory includes other predictions, which have received far less empirical scrutiny. Among these is the argument that self-control is developed early in childhood and that individual differences then persist over time. Gottfredson and Hirschi contend that once established by age ten, self-control remains relatively stable over one's life-course (stability postulate). To determine the empirical status of Gottfredson and Hirschi's "stability postulate," a meta-analysis on existing empirical studies was conducted. Results for this study support the contentions made by Gottfredson and Hirschi, however the inclusion of various moderating variables significantly influenced this relationship. Keywords: self-control, self-control stability, absolute stability, relative stability
Reuse Permissions
  • Included in this item (3)


    Details

    Title
    • Relative vs. absolute stability in self-control: a meta-analysis
    • Relative versus absolute stability in self-control
    Contributors
    Agent
    Date Created
    2013
    Collections this item is in
    Note
    • Appendix B : Self-control studies included in analysis (p. 44-47) issued in separate pdf
    • Partial requirement for: M.S., Arizona State University, 2013
      Note type
      thesis
    • Includes bibliographical references (p. 31-41)
      Note type
      bibliography
    • Field of study: Criminology and criminal justice

    Citation and reuse

    Statement of Responsibility

    by Travis J. Meyers

    Machine-readable links