Description

Often termed the "gold standard" in the differential diagnosis of dysarthria, the etiology-based Mayo Clinic classification approach has been used nearly exclusively by clinicians since the early 1970s. However, the

Often termed the "gold standard" in the differential diagnosis of dysarthria, the etiology-based Mayo Clinic classification approach has been used nearly exclusively by clinicians since the early 1970s. However, the current descriptive method results in a distinct overlap of perceptual features across various etiologies, thus limiting the clinical utility of such a system for differential diagnosis. Acoustic analysis may provide a more objective measure for improvement in overall reliability (Guerra & Lovely, 2003) of classification.

Reuse Permissions
  • 2.17 MB application/pdf

    Download count: 0

    Details

    Contributors
    Date Created
    • 2012
    Resource Type
  • Text
  • Collections this item is in
    Note
    • Partial requirement for: M.S., Arizona State University, 2012
      Note type
      thesis
    • Includes bibliographical references (p. 22-26)
      Note type
      bibliography
    • Field of study: Communication disorders

    Citation and reuse

    Statement of Responsibility

    by Rebecca Norton

    Machine-readable links