POLICY POINTS POLICY POINTS BRINGS RELEVANT DATA TO TIMELY PUBLIC POLICY ISSUES IN ARIZONA Social Safety Net Stretched by Demand ARIZONA INDICATORS VOLUME 1 / ISSUE 1 OCTOBER 2009 arizonaindicators.org Nearly 900,000 Arizonans — roughly the number of residents in metro Tucson — received food stamps, now known as the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP), in July 2009, a 35.6% increase since July 2008. The reasons are obvious: job losses and a struggling state economy challenged by the sagging housing market and a higher than average foreclosure rate. Arizona’s business cycle has historically been more volatile than other states. When the national economy is doing well, Arizona has done very well, and when the national economy falters, Arizona experiences even more pronounced Retail Sales Dropped Dramatically with losses. Now is certainly not an Recession, Inflation-Adjusted Percent Change in exception. When the state’s Taxable Retail Sales economy contracts, many are 15 affected. Many families, even some 12 who have never asked for government assistance before, are 9 finding nowhere else to turn for 6 help. 3 Economists have shown that Arizona’s recession began at the end of 2007. Snapshots of jobs and basic services in parts of 2007 through mid 2009 show the connections between business cycles and human services:  According to the Arizona Department of Commerce Research Administration, 195,800 nonfarm jobs have been lost since September 2008, and a total of 305,300 have been lost since the recession began in December 2007.  Arizona Heath Care Cost Containment System (AHCCCS) — this state’s version of Medicaid — provided health services to 1.3 million Arizonans in August 2009. That’s an 0 Arizona Indicators is an online information resource and analysis tool that centralizes data about the state and its communities. Arizona Indicators presents interactive visualizations, clear data descriptions, and public opinion data in a broad range of content areas. This project is made possible by generous support from the Arizona Community Foundation, Arizona State University, and Valley of the Sun United Way. -3 -6 -9 -12 1969 1971 1973 1975 1977 1979 1981 1983 1985 1987 1989 1991 1993 1995 1997 1999 2001 2003 2005 2007 1970 1972 1974 1976 1978 1980 1982 1984 1986 1988 1990 1992 1994 1996 1998 2000 2002 2004 2006 Arizona Maricopa For more information, contact Andrea Whitsett at (602) 496-0217 or andrea.whitsett@asu.edu. Pima Source: Arizona Department of Revenue. Arizona’s Historical Ups and Downs, Annual Percent Change in Real Earnings Arizona Indicators is a project managed by Morrison Institute for Public Policy. 12% 411 N Central Ave Suite 900 Phoenix, Arizona 85004-0692 (602) 496-0900 Main (602) 496-0964 Fax MorrisonInstitute.asu.edu 10% 8% 6% 4% 2% 0% -2% -4% -6% 1955 1959 1963 1967 1971 1975 1979 1983 1987 1991 1995 1999 2003 2007 United S tates A rizona Source: U.S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of Economic Analysis. Morrison Institute for Public Policy increase of 183,632 people (16.4%) over a year ago — and a 20.5% increase since the beginning of the economic downturn in December 2007.  In July 2009, 894,269 Arizona residents received SNAP compared to 554,389 in July 2007.  The number of cash recipients through Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF) has remained stable because this program’s eligibility guidelines are sufficiently low that it serves those who have experienced poverty for some time rather than those who have more resources or simply need assistance for a short time. As the demand for services continues to grow, state officials struggle to keep the social safety net intact while dealing with what is now estimated to be a deficit of nearly $2 billion. Demand for Food and Health Supports Rise as Employment Falls, Number of participants in SNAP, AHCCCS, and TANF, July 2007-July 2009 1,400,000 ent nrollm SE AHCCC 1,120,000 840,000 nts ecipie R SNAP 560,000 280,000 TANF Cash Recipients 0 July 2007 July 2008 July 2009 Source: Arizona Indicators, Arizona Department of Economic Security and Arizona Health Care Cost Containment System. While everyone awaits economic recovery, Arizona’s resources will continue to be stretched by new demand whether they come from state or federal sources. AHCCCS has already been impacted by budget cuts which were absorbed in part through a 5% reduction in provider rates. The Department of Economic Security (DES), which administers the federal SNAP and TANF programs, has had general fund cuts in excess of a quarterbillion in less than a year and a half. However, the Governor’s line-item vetoes have shielded them from an additional $50 million in proposed cuts. One-time adjustments and federal stimulus monies have helped Arizona recently, but another wave of cuts may be on the horizon. In response to the remaining deficit, and the need for additional information about potential impacts, state agencies provided impact estimates to the Governor’s Office in October. All agencies were asked, what cuts would you need to make to reduce costs by an additional 15%? For all agencies, the potential impacts are severe. For example, AHCCCS estimates they would have to defund the KidsCare program, which provides health insurance to children in families who earn between 100% and 200% of the federal poverty level (approximately Employment Losses Are Clear, Percent Change in $22,050 for an Arizona family of four). This equates to 47,000 low- Arizona and U.S. Nonfarm Employment, 1990-2009 income children losing health insurance. DES estimates that a 15% cut would result in a 20% reduction in cash benefits for 39,000 families with 64,000 children, among other impacts. If required to reduce costs by an additional 15%, AHCCCS estimates they would have to defund the KidsCare program, causing 47,000 low-income children to lose health insurance. As Arizona’s economy recovers, the demand will retreat somewhat, but how quickly that happens and how far down it goes will depend on the strength of Arizona’s recovery and the quality of jobs created in the future. Source: Arizona Workforce Informer, Arizona Department of Commerce Research Administration, February 26, 2009. POLICY POINTS OCTOBER 2009 2