Matching Items (3)
Filtering by
- Resource Type: Text
Description
As a democratic innovation involving deliberation and decision making, participatory budgeting (PB) often catalyzes powerful changes among individual participants and within their respective communities. Certain models of PB designate autonomous spaces for young people to determine how to spend a portion of a particular budget, typically that of a municipality or school. These processes of youth PB may address recent trends in the underrepresentation of youth in civic spaces. Following the initial launch of youth participatory budgeting (youth PB) in Cluj (Romania), I spent three weeks in Cluj conducting 45 semi-structured interviews with youth PB participants and one focus group with youth PB facilitators. This thesis explores two areas: (a) the main dynamics of the online Cluj youth PB process (team development and organization, themes of projects proposed and their intended impacts, and inclusion throughout the process) and (b) impact of youth PB on participants (participant learning, change, and empowerment). Main findings suggest that organized groups with ongoing projects dominated the youth PB process and that a majority of projects aspired to impact either all residents of Cluj or a specific youth group (e.g. young artists, young engineers), while very few projects intended to impact young people in Cluj broadly. More than 85% of participants reported feeling empowered by involvement in youth PB. Some differences in learning and change were found by gender, ethnicity, and age. Key recommendations for future iterations of this process include establishing deliberation between teams, encouraging informal group development, restructuring the voting process, and enhancing inclusion of ethnic minorities and migrants.
ContributorsBrennan, Ashley Jane (Author) / Schugurensky, Daniel, 1958- (Thesis director) / Almasan, Oana (Committee member) / Levine, Peter (Committee member) / Department of Psychology (Contributor) / School of Social Transformation (Contributor) / Barrett, The Honors College (Contributor)
Created2016-05
Description
Does school participatory budgeting (SPB) increase students’ political efficacy? SPB, which is implemented in thousands of schools around the world, is a democratic process of deliberation and decision-making in which students determine how to spend a portion of the school’s budget. We examined the impact of SPB on political efficacy in one middle school in Arizona. Our participants’ (n = 28) responses on survey items designed to measure self-perceived growth in political efficacy indicated a large effect size (Cohen’s d = 1.46), suggesting that SPB is an effective approach to civic pedagogy, with promising prospects for developing students’ political efficacy.
ContributorsGibbs, Norman P. (Author) / Bartlett, Tara Lynn (Author) / Schugurensky, Daniel, 1958- (Author)
Created2021-05-01
Description
Abstract
According to the National Institute on Deafness and other Communication Disorders (NIDCD), approximately 37 million Americans suffer from some degree of hearing loss, which impacts their ability to communicate fluently with the hearing world. This number includes up to 17% of the adult population, many who have experienced post-lingual or late-deafness. While hearing loss is known to be one of the most prevalent chronically disabling sensory conditions, little is known about the impact it has on individuals’ cultural identity and sense of well-being. There is somewhat of a deficit in the research literature addressing these issues of cultural identity, especially as it relates to post-lingually deaf adults. Improved knowledge of these dimensions of hearing loss is needed—a knowledge which could lead to more effective resources for late-deafened people. Though hearing loss can be disabling, access to American Sign Language and the Deaf culture may compensate for social and cultural loss and potentially improve well-being within late-deafened individuals. Using the framework of Social Identity Theory and Neil Glickman’s Deaf Identity Development model, this study sought to identify late-deafened adults who fall into the marginal category, placing them at greater risk of becoming socially marginalized and experiencing diminished well-being. Subjective well-being was then measured by the Flourishing Scale to determine how being socially marginal may impact one’s sense of self, personal prosperity, social efficacy, and sense of social competency. Results showed that marginal individuals do experience diminished subjective well-being, a fact which should be further explored by researchers, especially in the context of developing more effective interventions and services for late-deafened individuals.
According to the National Institute on Deafness and other Communication Disorders (NIDCD), approximately 37 million Americans suffer from some degree of hearing loss, which impacts their ability to communicate fluently with the hearing world. This number includes up to 17% of the adult population, many who have experienced post-lingual or late-deafness. While hearing loss is known to be one of the most prevalent chronically disabling sensory conditions, little is known about the impact it has on individuals’ cultural identity and sense of well-being. There is somewhat of a deficit in the research literature addressing these issues of cultural identity, especially as it relates to post-lingually deaf adults. Improved knowledge of these dimensions of hearing loss is needed—a knowledge which could lead to more effective resources for late-deafened people. Though hearing loss can be disabling, access to American Sign Language and the Deaf culture may compensate for social and cultural loss and potentially improve well-being within late-deafened individuals. Using the framework of Social Identity Theory and Neil Glickman’s Deaf Identity Development model, this study sought to identify late-deafened adults who fall into the marginal category, placing them at greater risk of becoming socially marginalized and experiencing diminished well-being. Subjective well-being was then measured by the Flourishing Scale to determine how being socially marginal may impact one’s sense of self, personal prosperity, social efficacy, and sense of social competency. Results showed that marginal individuals do experience diminished subjective well-being, a fact which should be further explored by researchers, especially in the context of developing more effective interventions and services for late-deafened individuals.
ContributorsBlech, Jennifer Grace (Author) / Almasan, Oana (Thesis director) / Wutich, Amber (Committee member) / School of Human Evolution & Social Change (Contributor) / School of Politics and Global Studies (Contributor) / Barrett, The Honors College (Contributor)
Created2019-12