Matching Items (15)
132328-Thumbnail Image.png
Description
This paper looks at case studies, legal journals, and legal commentaries to examine the history of plea bargains and determine how such a practice slowly crept its way into the American judicial system. Next, I discern both the two specific benefits and three disadvantages of utilizing plea bargains in a

This paper looks at case studies, legal journals, and legal commentaries to examine the history of plea bargains and determine how such a practice slowly crept its way into the American judicial system. Next, I discern both the two specific benefits and three disadvantages of utilizing plea bargains in a system that was traditionally renowned for its unique form of adversarial / trial based justice. By analyzing case studies and legal texts, I find that the administrative advantages and cost benefits used to rationalize continued usage of plea deals does not outweigh its extremely negative effects on significant aspects of law and the American legal system. These significant negative effects as a product of the plea bargain are a definitive hindrance to justice and further characterize the system as no longer fair and certainly not equitable. Consequently, I assert that in order to maintain the ethics of the system, plea bargains should be removed. I also generally outline the Philadelphia Bench Trial as a prospective and viable alternative to plea bargains that could act as an intriguing substitute. The Philadelphia Bench Trial represents a highly viable alternative to the plea bargain and consequently preserves many of the advantages plea bargains offer the system without sacrificing the adversarial element necessary to receive correct and accurate verdicts.
ContributorsRimsza, Alex Gill (Author) / Stanford, Michael (Thesis director) / Forst, Brad (Committee member) / Dean, W.P. Carey School of Business (Contributor) / Department of English (Contributor) / Sandra Day O'Connor College of Law (Contributor) / Barrett, The Honors College (Contributor)
Created2019-05
132738-Thumbnail Image.png
Description
Normally, the United States and most of Europe are grouped into the same category as “Western countries”, yet their ideological differences have become larger in the last 50 years, especially in regards to free speech/expression protections. This raises the possibility that extremely broad free speech/expression protections aren’t intrinsic values of

Normally, the United States and most of Europe are grouped into the same category as “Western countries”, yet their ideological differences have become larger in the last 50 years, especially in regards to free speech/expression protections. This raises the possibility that extremely broad free speech/expression protections aren’t intrinsic values of a Western society, but are instead an American experiment that was gradually adopted by Western Europe. Analyzing historical documents from both Europe and the United States, this becomes much more of a probability than a possibility and would help explain the recent differences in case law regarding free speech rights in American and European jurisprudence. Furthermore, Europe is also experiencing a potential threat to social stability in the form of massive, sudden demographic shifts, something that America has not experienced on nearly the same scale. Due to the heightened sensitivity towards hateful expression resulting from such a demographic shift, governmental action in the form of restrictions on racially, religiously, and ethnically charged forms of expressions may be deemed necessary in order to preserve social cohesion. Often throughout history, governments have deemed it necessary to limit free expression/speech and the spread of information in order to prevent any threat to its ability to rule, regardless of whether or not said government is tyrannical or democratized. Although not a direct threat to power, in a representative democracy social unrest created by increased division in the populace rooted in the spread of hateful ideology is nonetheless still a threat to those who depend on social harmony in order to govern in a representative democracy. In analyzing these two possible reasons for emerging differences and considering supporting textual and historical evidence, it becomes much clearer as to what the differences in case law and fundamental beliefs regarding the extent of free speech protections are attributable to.
ContributorsMantz, Noah (Author) / Stanford, Michael (Thesis director) / Foy, Joseph (Committee member) / Department of Economics (Contributor) / Barrett, The Honors College (Contributor)
Created2019-05
131084-Thumbnail Image.png
Description
It may be a common misconception that animal rights are primarily an issue which only the Western world is concerned about. However, many countries around the world with distinct cultural backgrounds and norms are becoming more cognizant of the importance of defending these rights, and are demanding changes in laws

It may be a common misconception that animal rights are primarily an issue which only the Western world is concerned about. However, many countries around the world with distinct cultural backgrounds and norms are becoming more cognizant of the importance of defending these rights, and are demanding changes in laws governing the treatment of animals.
ContributorsIndacochea, Nicole (Author) / Suk, Mina (Thesis director) / Stanford, Michael (Committee member) / School of Politics and Global Studies (Contributor) / Barrett, The Honors College (Contributor)
Created2020-05
130953-Thumbnail Image.png
Description
This thesis advocated for a humanities-forward bioethics in order to promote more robust discussion, foster public involvement in research, and enrich scientific education. Furthermore, embracing a field founded on personal expression allows for a wider breadth of concerns to be considered, not just those that are able to be articulated

This thesis advocated for a humanities-forward bioethics in order to promote more robust discussion, foster public involvement in research, and enrich scientific education. Furthermore, embracing a field founded on personal expression allows for a wider breadth of concerns to be considered, not just those that are able to be articulated in strictly technical terms. Speculative fiction liberates discussion from being constrained by what is presently feasible, and thus works to place societal and ethical deliberation ahead of scientific conception. The value of such stories is not tied to any one character or storyline, but rather it is derived from our ability as a culture with a shared understanding to superimpose our concerns and fears onto the novels and use them as a means of communication. Three famous science fiction novels- The Island of Dr. Moreau, Frankenstein, and Brave New World- were analyzed to illustrate the salience of science fiction to contend with fundamental issues in bioethics.
ContributorsVarda, Nicole Elizabeth (Author) / Hurlbut, Benjamin (Thesis director) / Stanford, Michael (Committee member) / Maynard, Andrew (Committee member) / School of Life Sciences (Contributor) / Barrett, The Honors College (Contributor)
Created2020-12
163900-Thumbnail Image.png
Description

This Project Report documents the accomplishments of an extraordinary group of students, faculty, and staff at the Arizona state University, who participated in a year-long, multidisciplinary, first-of-its-kind academic endeavor entitled “The Making of a COVID Lab.” The lab that is the focus of this project is the ASU Biodesign Clinical

This Project Report documents the accomplishments of an extraordinary group of students, faculty, and staff at the Arizona state University, who participated in a year-long, multidisciplinary, first-of-its-kind academic endeavor entitled “The Making of a COVID Lab.” The lab that is the focus of this project is the ASU Biodesign Clinical Testing Laboratory, known simply as the ABCTL.

ContributorsCompton, Carolyn C. (Project director) / Christianson, Serena L. (Project director) / Floyd, Christopher (Project director) / Schneller, Eugene S (Research team head) / Rigoni, Adam (Research team head) / Stanford, Michael (Research team head) / Cheong, Pauline (Research team head) / McCarville, Daniel R. (Research team head) / Dudley, Sean (Research team head) / Blum, Nita (Research team head) / Magee, Mitch (Research team head) / Agee, Claire (Research team member) / Cosgrove, Samuel (Research team member) / English, Corinne (Research team member) / Mattson, Kyle (Research team member) / Qian, Michael (Research team member) / Espinoza, Hale Anna (Research team member) / Filipek, Marina (Research team member) / Jenkins, Landon James (Research team member) / Ross, Nathaniel (Research team member) / Salvatierra, Madeline (Research team member) / Serrano, Osvin (Research team member) / Wakefield, Alex (Research team member) / Calo, Van Dexter (Research team member) / Nofi, Matthew (Research team member) / Raymond, Courtney (Research team member) / Barwey, Ishna (Research team member) / Bruner, Ashley (Research team member) / Hymer, William (Research team member) / Krell, Abby Elizabeth (Research team member) / Lewis, Gabriel (Research team member) / Myers, Jack (Research team member) / Ramesh, Frankincense (Research team member) / Reagan, Sage (Research team member) / Kandan, Mani (Research team member) / Knox, Garrett (Research team member) / Leung, Michael (Research team member) / Schmit, Jacob (Research team member) / Woo, Sabrina (Research team member) / Anderson, Laura (Research team member) / Breshears, Scott (Research team member) / Majhail, Kajol (Research team member) / Ruan, Ellen (Research team member) / Smetanick, Jennifer (Research team member) / Bardfeld, Sierra (Research team member) / Cura, Joriel (Research team member) / Dholaria, Nikhil (Research team member) / Foote, Hannah (Research team member) / Liu, Tara (Research team member) / Raymond, Julia (Research team member) / Varghese, Mahima (Research team member)
Created2021