Matching Items (3)
Description
As robotic technology and its various uses grow steadily more complex and ubiquitous, humans are coming into increasing contact with robotic agents. A large portion of such contact is cooperative interaction, where both humans and robots are required to work on the same application towards achieving common goals. These application scenarios are characterized by a need to leverage the strengths of each agent as part of a unified team to reach those common goals. To ensure that the robotic agent is truly a contributing team-member, it must exhibit some degree of autonomy in achieving goals that have been delegated to it. Indeed, a significant portion of the utility of such human-robot teams derives from the delegation of goals to the robot, and autonomy on the part of the robot in achieving those goals. In order to be considered truly autonomous, the robot must be able to make its own plans to achieve the goals assigned to it, with only minimal direction and assistance from the human.
Automated planning provides the solution to this problem -- indeed, one of the main motivations that underpinned the beginnings of the field of automated planning was to provide planning support for Shakey the robot with the STRIPS system. For long, however, automated planners suffered from scalability issues that precluded their application to real world, real time robotic systems. Recent decades have seen a gradual abeyance of those issues, and fast planning systems are now the norm rather than the exception. However, some of these advances in speedup and scalability have been achieved by ignoring or abstracting out challenges that real world integrated robotic systems must confront.
In this work, the problem of planning for human-hobot teaming is introduced. The central idea -- the use of automated planning systems as mediators in such human-robot teaming scenarios -- and the main challenges inspired from real world scenarios that must be addressed in order to make such planning seamless are presented: (i) Goals which can be specified or changed at execution time, after the planning process has completed; (ii) Worlds and scenarios where the state changes dynamically while a previous plan is executing; (iii) Models that are incomplete and can be changed during execution; and (iv) Information about the human agent's plan and intentions that can be used for coordination. These challenges are compounded by the fact that the human-robot team must execute in an open world, rife with dynamic events and other agents; and in a manner that encourages the exchange of information between the human and the robot. As an answer to these challenges, implemented solutions and a fielded prototype that combines all of those solutions into one planning system are discussed. Results from running this prototype in real world scenarios are presented, and extensions to some of the solutions are offered as appropriate.
Automated planning provides the solution to this problem -- indeed, one of the main motivations that underpinned the beginnings of the field of automated planning was to provide planning support for Shakey the robot with the STRIPS system. For long, however, automated planners suffered from scalability issues that precluded their application to real world, real time robotic systems. Recent decades have seen a gradual abeyance of those issues, and fast planning systems are now the norm rather than the exception. However, some of these advances in speedup and scalability have been achieved by ignoring or abstracting out challenges that real world integrated robotic systems must confront.
In this work, the problem of planning for human-hobot teaming is introduced. The central idea -- the use of automated planning systems as mediators in such human-robot teaming scenarios -- and the main challenges inspired from real world scenarios that must be addressed in order to make such planning seamless are presented: (i) Goals which can be specified or changed at execution time, after the planning process has completed; (ii) Worlds and scenarios where the state changes dynamically while a previous plan is executing; (iii) Models that are incomplete and can be changed during execution; and (iv) Information about the human agent's plan and intentions that can be used for coordination. These challenges are compounded by the fact that the human-robot team must execute in an open world, rife with dynamic events and other agents; and in a manner that encourages the exchange of information between the human and the robot. As an answer to these challenges, implemented solutions and a fielded prototype that combines all of those solutions into one planning system are discussed. Results from running this prototype in real world scenarios are presented, and extensions to some of the solutions are offered as appropriate.
ContributorsTalamadupula, Kartik (Author) / Kambhampati, Subbarao (Thesis advisor) / Baral, Chitta (Committee member) / Liu, Huan (Committee member) / Scheutz, Matthias (Committee member) / Smith, David E. (Committee member) / Arizona State University (Publisher)
Created2014
Description
A critical challenge in the design of AI systems that operate with humans in the loop is to be able to model the intentions and capabilities of the humans, as well as their beliefs and expectations of the AI system itself. This allows the AI system to be "human- aware" -- i.e. the human task model enables it to envisage desired roles of the human in joint action, while the human mental model allows it to anticipate how its own actions are perceived from the point of view of the human. In my research, I explore how these concepts of human-awareness manifest themselves in the scope of planning or sequential decision making with humans in the loop. To this end, I will show (1) how the AI agent can leverage the human task model to generate symbiotic behavior; and (2) how the introduction of the human mental model in the deliberative process of the AI agent allows it to generate explanations for a plan or resort to explicable plans when explanations are not desired. The latter is in addition to traditional notions of human-aware planning which typically use the human task model alone and thus enables a new suite of capabilities of a human-aware AI agent. Finally, I will explore how the AI agent can leverage emerging mixed-reality interfaces to realize effective channels of communication with the human in the loop.
ContributorsChakraborti, Tathagata (Author) / Kambhampati, Subbarao (Thesis advisor) / Talamadupula, Kartik (Committee member) / Scheutz, Matthias (Committee member) / Ben Amor, Hani (Committee member) / Zhang, Yu (Committee member) / Arizona State University (Publisher)
Created2018
Description
With improvements in automation and system capabilities, human responsibilities in those advanced systems can get more complicated; greater situational awareness and performance may be asked of human agents in roles such as fail-safe operators. This phenomenon of automation improvements requiring more from humans in the loop, is connected to the well-known “paradox of automation”. Unfortunately, humans have cognitive limitations that can constrain a person's performance on a task. If one considers human cognitive limitations when designing solutions or policies for human agents, then better results are possible. The focus of this dissertation is on improving human involvement in planning and execution for Sequential Decision Making (SDM) problems. Existing work already considers incorporating humans into planning and execution in SDM, but with limited consideration for cognitive limitations. The work herein focuses on how to improve human involvement through problems in motion planning, planning interfaces, Markov Decision Processes (MDP), and human-team scheduling. This done by first discussing the human modeling assumptions currently used in the literature and their shortcomings. Then this dissertation tackles a set of problems by considering problem-specific human cognitive limitations --such as those associated with memory and inference-- as well as use lessons from fields such as cognitive ergonomics.
ContributorsGopalakrishnan, Sriram (Author) / Kambhampati, Subbarao (Thesis advisor) / Srivastava, Siddharth (Committee member) / Scheutz, Matthias (Committee member) / Zhang, Yu (Tony) (Committee member) / Arizona State University (Publisher)
Created2022