tion source is a challenging task with vital applications including surveillance and robotics.
Recent NLOS reconstruction advances have been achieved using time-resolved measure-
ments. Acquiring these time-resolved measurements requires expensive and specialized
detectors and laser sources. In work proposes a data-driven approach for NLOS 3D local-
ization requiring only a conventional camera and projector. The localisation is performed
using a voxelisation and a regression problem. Accuracy of greater than 90% is achieved
in localizing a NLOS object to a 5cm × 5cm × 5cm volume in real data. By adopting
the regression approach an object of width 10cm to localised to approximately 1.5cm. To
generalize to line-of-sight (LOS) scenes with non-planar surfaces, an adaptive lighting al-
gorithm is adopted. This algorithm, based on radiosity, identifies and illuminates scene
patches in the LOS which most contribute to the NLOS light paths, and can factor in sys-
tem power constraints. Improvements ranging from 6%-15% in accuracy with a non-planar
LOS wall using adaptive lighting is reported, demonstrating the advantage of combining
the physics of light transport with active illumination for data-driven NLOS imaging.
In this thesis, six experiments which were computer simulations were conducted in order to replicate the negative association between sample size and accuracy that is repeatedly found in ML literature by accounting for data leakage and publication bias. The reason why it is critical to understand why this negative association is occurring is that in published studies, there have been multiple reports that the accuracies in ML models are overoptimistic leading to cases where the results are irreproducible despite conducting multiple trials and experiments. Additionally, after replicating the negative association between sample size and accuracy, parametric curves (learning curves with the parametric function) were fitted along the empirical learning curves in order to evaluate the performance. It was found that there is a significant variance in accuracies when the sample size is small, but little to no variation when the sample size is large. In other words, the empirical learning curves with data leakage and publication bias were able to achieve the same accuracy as the learning curve without data leakage at a large sample size.