Matching Items (4,311)
Filtering by

Clear all filters

135577-Thumbnail Image.png
Description
The following study will address the questions: "Why is it essential to teach elementary students about sustainability?" and "How do we teach elementary students about sustainability?" Teachers have an obligation to their students, as well as to the planet, to make their students concerned about sustainability. Many natural resources students

The following study will address the questions: "Why is it essential to teach elementary students about sustainability?" and "How do we teach elementary students about sustainability?" Teachers have an obligation to their students, as well as to the planet, to make their students concerned about sustainability. Many natural resources students need in the future in order to survive are running out. Without a future generation prepared with the skills to challenge issues and investigate complex problems, the Earth will remain in a jeopardized state. Teachers need to incorporate sustainability-themed literature into their classrooms and lessons in order to prepare this future generation with those skills. Teachers should inform their students about the history of the term "sustainability." During this study, it was found that the sustainability curriculum topics and the "Four Ways of Thinking" could have been included into the existing curriculum. Subsequently, sustainable and critical thinking are aligned because they both share many of the same skills. Teachers could have students investigate current and past news articles to discover the problems caused by using natural resources unsustainably. Current news articles could be given to students, so they can look at how these issues can be solved with the use of alternative resources. Many of the younger students might not have a high enough reading level to understand news articles. There have been websites created that are geared toward younger audiences, so this would allow teachers to incorporate news into their lessons. Projects and class discussions should be rooted in sustainability. Class discussions can take place every day or once a week, while projects can occur over the course of a single month. Many teachers think the curriculum is too focused on improving state test scores. Nevertheless, the curriculum should contain sustainable and critical thinking skills. The implementation of sustainability education seems to overwhelm teachers because some do not see how they can incorporate it into their classrooms. However, this study found that these particular instructors can design existing lesson topics around the content and ways of thinking in sustainability education. Another reason why there is resistance to sustainability education is because the sustainability programs would add even more to each school's budget. Schools could raise funds for sustainability education, or apply for grants from the government. The in-depth literature review within this qualitative and open-ended study looked at subjective data. Sustainability, sustainability education, elementary curriculum, classroom, and teachers were just a sample of the key terms used for article searches in Google Scholar through Arizona State University. The reduction techniques included discarding any literature that neither linked directly to the problem statement nor with the ideas relating to the research questions. Limitations within the field of sustainability and elementary education include the research among middle and high schools across the nation. Many of the ideas for future research include the analysis of the long-term effects of incorporation of sustainability education within elementary curricula.
ContributorsWenninger, Jessica Shea (Author) / Ahmad, Omaya (Thesis director) / Shelton, Catharyn (Committee member) / Division of Teacher Preparation (Contributor) / Barrett, The Honors College (Contributor)
Created2016-05
133588-Thumbnail Image.png
Description
With the new independence of adulthood, college students are a group susceptible to adopting unsupported, if not harmful, health practices. A survey of Arizona State University undergraduate students (N=200) was conducted to evaluate supplement use, trust in information sources, and beliefs about supplement regulation. Of those who reported using supplements,

With the new independence of adulthood, college students are a group susceptible to adopting unsupported, if not harmful, health practices. A survey of Arizona State University undergraduate students (N=200) was conducted to evaluate supplement use, trust in information sources, and beliefs about supplement regulation. Of those who reported using supplements, college students most frequently received information from friends and family. STEM majors in fields unrelated to health who were taking a supplement were found to be less likely to receive information about the supplement from a medical practitioner than those in health fields or those in non-STEM majors (-26.9%, p=0.018). STEM majors in health-related fields were 15.0% more likely to treat colds and/or cold symptoms with research-supported methods identified from reliable sources, while non-health STEM and non-STEM majors were more likely to take unsupported cold treatments (p=0.010). Surveyed students, regardless of major, also stated they would trust a medical practitioner for supplement advice above other sources (88.0%), and the majority expressed a belief that dietary supplements are approved/regulated by the government (59.8%).
ContributorsPerez, Jacob Tanner (Author) / Hendrickson, Kirstin (Thesis director) / Lefler, Scott (Committee member) / College of Liberal Arts and Sciences (Contributor) / School of Molecular Sciences (Contributor) / Department of Physics (Contributor) / Barrett, The Honors College (Contributor)
Created2018-05
137433-Thumbnail Image.png
ContributorsChandler, N. Kayla (Author) / Neisewander, Janet (Thesis director) / Sanabria, Federico (Committee member) / Olive, M. Foster (Committee member) / Barrett, The Honors College (Contributor) / College of Liberal Arts and Sciences (Contributor)
Created2013-05
137434-Thumbnail Image.png
Description
I propose that norms regulate behaviors that negatively impact an individual's survival and reproduction. But because monitoring and enforcing of norms can be costly, individuals should be selective about which norms they police and under what circumstances they should do so. Two studies tested this idea by experimentally activating fitness-relevant

I propose that norms regulate behaviors that negatively impact an individual's survival and reproduction. But because monitoring and enforcing of norms can be costly, individuals should be selective about which norms they police and under what circumstances they should do so. Two studies tested this idea by experimentally activating fitness-relevant motives and having participants answer questions about the policing of norms. The first study examined a norm prescribing respect for status and another proscribing sexual coercion. Results from Study 1 failed to support the hypotheses; activating a status-seeking motive did not have the predicted effects on policing of the respect-status norm nor did activating a mating motive have the predicted effects on policing of the respect-status norm or anti-coercion norm. Study 2 examined two new norms, one prescribing that people stay home when sick and the other proscribing people from having sex with another person's partners. Study 2 also manipulated whether self or others were the target of the policing. Study 2 failed to provide support; a disease avoidance motive failed to have effects on policing of the stay home when sick norm. Individuals in a relationship under a mating motive wanted less policing of others for violation of the mate poaching norm than those in a baseline condition, opposite of the predicted effects.
ContributorsSmith, M. Kristopher (Author) / Neuberg, L. Steven (Thesis director) / Presson, Clark (Committee member) / Hruschka, J. Daniel (Committee member) / Barrett, The Honors College (Contributor) / College of Liberal Arts and Sciences (Contributor)
Created2013-05
137565-Thumbnail Image.png
Description
Literature in public administration emphasizes a growing dissatisfaction with government on the part of residents. Where there tends to be a lack in the literature is in terms of solutions to this problem. We would like to argue that the engagement process itself has the power to foster a profound

Literature in public administration emphasizes a growing dissatisfaction with government on the part of residents. Where there tends to be a lack in the literature is in terms of solutions to this problem. We would like to argue that the engagement process itself has the power to foster a profound attitudinal shift on the part of both residents and government. This paper explores the structural and cultural barriers to satisfactory public engagement both from literature and a combination of policy analysis, semi-structured interviews and participatory observation within the City of Tempe. We then provide recommendations to the City of Tempe on how to overcome these barriers and effect authentic public engagement practices. With these new suggested practices and mindsets, we provide a way that people can have the power to create their own community.
ContributorsRiffle, Morgan (Co-author) / Tchida, Celina (Co-author) / Ingram-Waters, Mary (Thesis director) / Grzanka, Patrick (Committee member) / King, Cheryl (Committee member) / Barrett, The Honors College (Contributor) / College of Liberal Arts and Sciences (Contributor)
Created2013-05