Matching Items (3)
Filtering by
- Genre: Doctoral Dissertation
Description
A current thrust in neurorehabilitation research involves exogenous neuromodulation of peripheral nerves to enhance neuroplasticity and maximize recovery of function. This dissertation presents the results of four experiments aimed at assessing the effects of trigeminal nerve stimulation (TNS) and occipital nerve stimulation (ONS) on motor learning, which was behaviorally characterized using an upper extremity visuomotor adaptation paradigm. In Aim 1a, the effects of offline TNS using clinically tested frequencies (120 and 60 Hz) were characterized. Sixty-three participants (22.75±4.6 y/o), performed a visuomotor rotation task and received TNS before encountering rotation of hand visual feedback. In Aim 1b, TNS at 3 kHz, which has been shown to be more tolerable at higher current intensities, was evaluated in 42 additional subjects (23.4±4.6 y/o). Results indicated that 3 kHz stimulation accelerated learning while 60 Hz stimulation slowed learning, suggesting a frequency-dependent effect on learning. In Aim 2, the effect of online TNS using 120 and 60 Hz were characterized to determine if this protocol would deliver better outcomes. Sixty-three participants (23.2±3.9 y/o) received either TNS or sham concurrently with perturbed visual feedback. Results showed no significant differences among groups. However, a cross-study comparison of results obtained with 60 Hz offline TNS showed a statistically significant improvement in learning rates with online stimulation relative to offline, suggesting a timing-dependent effect on learning. In Aim 3, TNS and ONS were compared using the best protocol from previous aims (offline 3 kHz). Additionally, concurrent stimulation of both nerves was explored to look for potential synergistic effects. Eighty-four participants (22.9±3.2 y/o) were assigned to one of four groups: TNS, ONS, TNS+ONS, and sham. Visual inspection of learning curves revealed that the ONS group demonstrated the fastest learning among groups. However, statistical analyses did not confirm this observation. In addition, the TNS+ONS group appeared to learn faster than the sham and TNS groups but slower than the ONS only group, suggesting no synergistic effects using this protocol, as initially hypothesized.
The results provide new information on the potential use of TNS and ONS in neurorehabilitation and performance enhancement in the motor domain.
ContributorsArias, Diego (Author) / Buneo, Christopher (Thesis advisor) / Schaefer, Sydney (Committee member) / Helms-Tillery, Stephen (Committee member) / Santello, Marco (Committee member) / Kleim, Jeffrey (Committee member) / Arizona State University (Publisher)
Created2023
Description
Stroke is the leading cause of long-term disability in the U.S., with up to 60% of strokescausing speech loss. Individuals with severe stroke, who require the most frequent, intense speech therapy, often cannot adhere to treatments due to high cost and low success rates. Therefore, the ability to make functionally significant changes in individuals with severe post- stroke aphasia remains a key challenge for the rehabilitation community. This dissertation aimed to evaluate the efficacy of Startle Adjuvant Rehabilitation Therapy (START), a tele-enabled, low- cost treatment, to improve quality of life and speech in individuals with severe-to-moderate stroke. START is the exposure to startling acoustic stimuli during practice of motor tasks in individuals with stroke. START increases the speed and intensity of practice in severely impaired post-stroke reaching, with START eliciting muscle activity 2-3 times higher than maximum voluntary contraction. Voluntary reaching distance, onset, and final accuracy increased after a session of START, suggesting a rehabilitative effect. However, START has not been evaluated during impaired speech. The objective of this study is to determine if impaired speech can be elicited by startling acoustic stimuli, and if three days of START training can enhance clinical measures of moderate to severe post-stroke aphasia and apraxia of speech. This dissertation evaluates START in 42 individuals with post-stroke speech impairment via telehealth in a Phase 0 clinical trial. Results suggest that impaired speech can be elicited by startling acoustic stimuli and that START benefits individuals with severe-to-moderate post-stroke impairments in both linguistic and motor speech domains. This fills an important gap in aphasia care, as many speech therapies remain ineffective and financially inaccessible for patients with severe deficits. START is effective, remotely delivered, and may likely serve as an affordable adjuvant to traditional therapy for those that have poor access to quality care.
ContributorsSwann, Zoe Elisabeth (Author) / Honeycutt, Claire F (Thesis advisor) / Daliri, Ayoub (Committee member) / Rogalsky, Corianne (Committee member) / Liss, Julie (Committee member) / Schaefer, Sydney (Committee member) / Arizona State University (Publisher)
Created2022
Description
Stroke is a debilitating disorder and 75% of individuals with stroke (iwS) have upper extremity deficits. IwS are prescribed therapies to enhance upper-extremity mobility, but current most effective therapies have minimum requirements that the individuals with severe impairment do not meet. Thus, there is a need to enhance the therapies. Recent studies have shown that StartReact -the involuntary release of a planned movement, triggered by a startling stimulus (e.g., loud sound)- elicits faster and larger muscle activation in iwS compared to voluntary-initiated movement. However, StartReact has been only cursorily studied to date and there are some gaps in the StartReact knowledge. Previous studies have only evaluated StartReact on single-jointed movements in iwS, ignoring more functional tasks. IwS usually have abnormal flexor activity during extension tasks and abnormal muscle synergy especially during multi-jointed tasks; therefore, it is unknown 1) if more complex multi-jointed reach movements are susceptible to StartReact, and 2) if StartReact multi-jointed movements will be enhanced in the same way as single-jointed movements in iwS. In addition, previous studies showed that individuals with severe stroke, especially those with higher spasticity, experienced higher abnormal flexor muscle activation during StartReact trials. However, there is no study evaluating the impact of this elevated abnormal flexor activity on movement, muscle activation and muscle synergy alterations during voluntary-initiated movements after exposure to StartReact.
This dissertation evaluates StartReact and the voluntary trials before and after exposure to StartReact during a point-to-point multi-jointed reach task to three different targets covering a large workspace. The results show that multi-jointed reach tasks are susceptible to StartReact in iwS and the distance, muscle and movement onset speed, and muscle activations percentages and amplitude increase during StartReact trials. In addition, the distance, accuracy, muscle and movement onsets speeds, and muscle synergy similarity indices to the norm synergies increase during the voluntary-initiated trials after exposure to StartReact. Overall, this dissertation shows that exposure to StartReact did not impair voluntary-initiated movement and muscle synergy, but even improved them. Therefore, this study suggests that StartReact is safe for more investigations in training studies and therapy.
This dissertation evaluates StartReact and the voluntary trials before and after exposure to StartReact during a point-to-point multi-jointed reach task to three different targets covering a large workspace. The results show that multi-jointed reach tasks are susceptible to StartReact in iwS and the distance, muscle and movement onset speed, and muscle activations percentages and amplitude increase during StartReact trials. In addition, the distance, accuracy, muscle and movement onsets speeds, and muscle synergy similarity indices to the norm synergies increase during the voluntary-initiated trials after exposure to StartReact. Overall, this dissertation shows that exposure to StartReact did not impair voluntary-initiated movement and muscle synergy, but even improved them. Therefore, this study suggests that StartReact is safe for more investigations in training studies and therapy.
ContributorsRahimiTouranposhti, Marziye (Author) / Honeycutt, Claire F. (Thesis advisor) / Roh, Jinsook (Committee member) / Berman, Spring (Committee member) / Lee, Hyunglae (Committee member) / Marvi, Hamid (Committee member) / Schaefer, Sydney (Committee member) / Arizona State University (Publisher)
Created2020