Matching Items (1)
Filtering by
- Creators: Nelson, Brian C
Description
Evidence suggests that Augmented Reality (AR) may be a powerful tool for
alleviating certain, lightly held scientific misconceptions. However, many
misconceptions surrounding the theory of evolution are deeply held and resistant to
change. This study examines whether AR can serve as an effective tool for alleviating
these misconceptions by comparing the change in the number of misconceptions
expressed by users of a tablet-based version of a well-established classroom simulation to
the change in the number of misconceptions expressed by users of AR versions of the
simulation.
The use of realistic representations of objects is common for many AR
developers. However, this contradicts well-tested practices of multimedia design that
argue against the addition of unnecessary elements. This study also compared the use of
representational visualizations in AR, in this case, models of ladybug beetles, to symbolic
representations, in this case, colored circles.
To address both research questions, a one-factor, between-subjects experiment
was conducted with 189 participants randomly assigned to one of three conditions: non
AR, symbolic AR, and representational AR. Measures of change in the number and types
of misconceptions expressed, motivation, and time on task were examined using a pair of
planned orthogonal contrasts designed to test the study’s two research questions.
Participants in the AR-based condition showed a significantly smaller change in
the number of total misconceptions expressed after the treatment as well as in the number
of misconceptions related to intentionality; none of the other misconceptions examined
showed a significant difference. No significant differences were found in the total
number of misconceptions expressed between participants in the representative and
symbolic AR-based conditions, or on motivation. Contrary to the expectation that the
simulation would alleviate misconceptions, the average change in the number of
misconceptions expressed by participants increased. This is theorized to be due to the
juxtaposition of virtual and real-world entities resulting in a reduction in assumed
intentionality.
alleviating certain, lightly held scientific misconceptions. However, many
misconceptions surrounding the theory of evolution are deeply held and resistant to
change. This study examines whether AR can serve as an effective tool for alleviating
these misconceptions by comparing the change in the number of misconceptions
expressed by users of a tablet-based version of a well-established classroom simulation to
the change in the number of misconceptions expressed by users of AR versions of the
simulation.
The use of realistic representations of objects is common for many AR
developers. However, this contradicts well-tested practices of multimedia design that
argue against the addition of unnecessary elements. This study also compared the use of
representational visualizations in AR, in this case, models of ladybug beetles, to symbolic
representations, in this case, colored circles.
To address both research questions, a one-factor, between-subjects experiment
was conducted with 189 participants randomly assigned to one of three conditions: non
AR, symbolic AR, and representational AR. Measures of change in the number and types
of misconceptions expressed, motivation, and time on task were examined using a pair of
planned orthogonal contrasts designed to test the study’s two research questions.
Participants in the AR-based condition showed a significantly smaller change in
the number of total misconceptions expressed after the treatment as well as in the number
of misconceptions related to intentionality; none of the other misconceptions examined
showed a significant difference. No significant differences were found in the total
number of misconceptions expressed between participants in the representative and
symbolic AR-based conditions, or on motivation. Contrary to the expectation that the
simulation would alleviate misconceptions, the average change in the number of
misconceptions expressed by participants increased. This is theorized to be due to the
juxtaposition of virtual and real-world entities resulting in a reduction in assumed
intentionality.
ContributorsHenry, Matthew McClellan (Author) / Atkinson, Robert K (Thesis advisor) / Johnson-Glenberg, Mina C (Committee member) / Nelson, Brian C (Committee member) / Arizona State University (Publisher)
Created2019