Matching Items (9)
Description
Natural history is, and was, dependent upon the collection of specimens. In the nineteenth century, American naturalists and institutions of natural history cultivated and maintained extensive collection networks comprised of numerous collectors that provided objects of natural history for study. Effective networks were collaborative in nature, with naturalists such as Spencer Baird of the Smithsonian trading their time and expertise for specimens. The incorporation of Darwinian and Neo-Lamarckian evolutionary theory into natural history in the middle of the century led to dramatic changes in the relationship between naturalists and collectors, as naturalists sought to reconcile their observations within the new evolutionary context. This dissertation uses the careers of collectors Robert Kennicott, Frank Stephens, Edward W. Nelson, E.A. Goldman, and Edmund Heller as case studies in order to evaluate how the changes in the theoretical framework of late nineteenth century natural history led to advances in field practice by assessing how naturalists trained their collectors to meet new demands within the field. Research focused on the correspondence between naturalists and collectors, along with the field notes and applicable publications by collectors. I argue that the changes in natural history necessitated naturalists training their collectors in the basics of biogeography - the study of geographic distribution of organisms, and systematics - the study of the diversity of life - leading to a collaborative relationship in which collectors played an active role in the formation of new biological knowledge. The project concludes that the changes in natural history with regard to theory and practice gradually necessitated a more professional cadre of collectors. Collectors became active agents in the formation of biological knowledge, and instrumental in the formation of a truly systematic natural history. As a result, collectors became de facto field naturalists, the forerunners of the field biologists that dominated the practice of natural history in the early and middle twentieth century.
ContributorsLaubacher, Matthew (Author) / Green, Monica (Thesis advisor) / Laubichler, Manfred (Thesis advisor) / Wright, Johnson Kent (Committee member) / Arizona State University (Publisher)
Created2011
Description
Here I present a phylogeographic study of at least six reproductively isolated lineages of harvester ants within the Pogonomyrmex barbatus and P. rugosus species group. The genetic and geographic relationships within this clade are complex: four of the identified lineages are divided into two pairs, and each pair has evolved under a mutualistic system that necessitates sympatry. These paired lineages are dependent upon one another because interlineage matings within each pair are the sole source of hybrid F1 workers; these workers build and sustain the colonies, facilitating the production of the reproductive caste, which results solely from intralineage fertilizations. This system of genetic caste determination (GCD) maintains genetic isolation among these closely related lineages, while simultaneously requiring co-expansion and emigration as their distributions have changed over time. Previous studies have also demonstrated that three of the four lineages displaying this unique genetic caste determination phenotype are of hybrid origin. Thus, reconstructing the phylogenetic and geographic history of this group allows us to evaluate past insights and plan future inquiries in a more complete historical biogeographic context. Using mitochondrial DNA sequences sampled across most of the morphospecies' ranges in the U.S. and Mexico, I employed several methods of phylogenetic and DNA sequence analysis, along with comparisons to geological, biogeographic, and phylogeographic studies throughout the sampled regions. These analyses on Pogonomyrmex harvester ants reveal a complex pattern of vicariance and dispersal that is largely concordant with models of late Miocene, Pliocene, and Pleistocene range shifts among various arid-adapted taxa in North America.
ContributorsMott, Brendon (Author) / Gadau, Juergen (Thesis advisor) / Fewell, Jennifer (Committee member) / Anderson, Kirk (Committee member) / Arizona State University (Publisher)
Created2012
Description
This work investigates the effects of non-random sampling on our understanding of species distributions and their niches. In its most general form, bias is systematic error that can obscure interpretation of analytical results by skewing samples away from the average condition of the system they represent. Here I use species distribution modelling (SDM), virtual species, and multiscale geographically weighted regression (MGWR) to explore how sampling bias can alter our perception of broad patterns of biodiversity by distorting spatial predictions of habitat, a key characteristic in biogeographic studies. I use three separate case studies to explore: 1) How methods to account for sampling bias in species distribution modeling may alter estimates of species distributions and species-environment relationships, 2) How accounting for sampling bias in fossil data may change our understanding of paleo-distributions and interpretation of niche stability through time (i.e. niche conservation), and 3) How a novel use of MGWR can account for environmental sampling bias to reveal landscape patterns of local niche differences among proximal, but non-overlapping sister taxa. Broadly, my work shows that sampling bias present in commonly used federated global biodiversity observations is more than enough to degrade model performance of spatial predictions and niche characteristics. Measures commonly used to account for this bias can negate much loss, but only in certain conditions, and did not improve the ability to correctly identify explanatory variables or recreate species-environment relationships. Paleo-distributions calibrated on biased fossil records were improved with the use of a novel method to directly estimate the biased sampling distribution, which can be generalized to finer time slices for further paleontological studies. Finally, I show how a novel coupling of SDM and MGWR can illuminate local differences in niche separation that more closely match landscape genotypic variability in the two North American desert tortoise species than does their current taxonomic delineation.
ContributorsInman, Richard (Author) / Franklin, Janet (Thesis advisor) / Fotheringham, A. Stewart (Committee member) / Dorn, Ronald (Committee member) / Arizona State University (Publisher)
Created2018
Description
Understanding the diversity, evolutionary relationships, and geographic distribution of species is foundational knowledge in biology. However, this knowledge is lacking for many diverse lineages of the tree of life. This is the case for the desert stink beetles in the tribe Amphidorini LeConte, 1862 (Coleoptera: Tenebrionidae) – a lineage of arid-adapted flightless beetles found throughout western North America. Four interconnected studies that jointly increase our knowledge of this group are presented. First, the darkling beetle fauna of the Algodones sand dunes in southern California is examined as a case study to explore the scientific practice of checklist creation. An updated list of the species known from this region is presented, with a critical focus on material now made available through digitization and global aggregation. This part concludes with recommendations for future biodiversity checklist authors. Second, the psammophilic genus Trogloderus LeConte, 1879 is revised. Six new species are described, and the first, multi-gene phylogeny for the genus is inferred. In addition, historical biogeographic reconstructions along with novel hypotheses of speciation patterns within the Intermountain Region are given. In particular, the Kaibab Plateau and Kaiparowitz Formation are found to have promoted speciation on the Colorado Plateau. The Owens Valley and prehistoric Bouse Embayment are similarly hypothesized to drive species diversification in southern California. Third, a novel phylogenomic analysis for the tribe Amphidorini is presented, based on 29 de novo partial transcriptomes. Three putative ortholog sets were discovered and analyzed to infer the relationships between species groups and genera. The existing classification of the tribe is found to be highly inadequate, though the earliest-diverging relationships within the tribe are still in question. Finally, the new phylogenetic framework is used to provide a genus-level revision for the Amphidorini, which previously contained six valid genera and 253 valid species. This updated classification includes more than 100 taxonomic changes and results in the revised tribe consisting of 16 genera, with three being described as new to science.
ContributorsJohnston, Murray Andrew (Author) / Franz, Nico M (Thesis advisor) / Cartwright, Reed (Committee member) / Taylor, Jesse (Committee member) / Pigg, Kathleen (Committee member) / Arizona State University (Publisher)
Created2018
Description
Biogeography is the study of the spatial distribution of the earth's biota, both in the present and the past. Traditionally, biogeographical studies have relied on a combination of surveys of existing populations, fossil evidence, and the geological record of the earth. However, with the advent of relatively inexpensive methods of DNA sequencing, it is now possible to use information concerning the genetic relatedness of individuals in populations to address questions about how those populations came to be where they are today. For example, biogeographical studies of HIV-I provide strong support for the hypothesis that this virus arose in Africa through a host switch from chimpanzees to humans and only began to spread to human populations located on other continents some 60 to 70 years ago (Sharp & Hahn, 2010).
ContributorsZheng, Wenyu (Author) / Taylor, Jesse (Thesis director) / Escalante, Ananias (Committee member) / Thieme, Horst (Committee member) / Barrett, The Honors College (Contributor)
Created2015-05
Description
The majority of trust research has focused on the benefits trust can have for individual actors, institutions, and organizations. This “optimistic bias” is particularly evident in work focused on institutional trust, where concepts such as procedural justice, shared values, and moral responsibility have gained prominence. But trust in institutions may not be exclusively good. We reveal implications for the “dark side” of institutional trust by reviewing relevant theories and empirical research that can contribute to a more holistic understanding. We frame our discussion by suggesting there may be a “Goldilocks principle” of institutional trust, where trust that is too low (typically the focus) or too high (not usually considered by trust researchers) may be problematic. The chapter focuses on the issue of too-high trust and processes through which such too-high trust might emerge. Specifically, excessive trust might result from external, internal, and intersecting external-internal processes. External processes refer to the actions institutions take that affect public trust, while internal processes refer to intrapersonal factors affecting a trustor’s level of trust. We describe how the beneficial psychological and behavioral outcomes of trust can be mitigated or circumvented through these processes and highlight the implications of a “darkest” side of trust when they intersect. We draw upon research on organizations and legal, governmental, and political systems to demonstrate the dark side of trust in different contexts. The conclusion outlines directions for future research and encourages researchers to consider the ethical nuances of studying how to increase institutional trust.
ContributorsNeal, Tess M.S. (Author) / Shockley, Ellie (Author) / Schilke, Oliver (Author)
Created2016
Description
In the face of the sixth mass extinction on Earth, with the flowering plant family Cactaceae assessed as the fifth most endangered plant or animal family by the International Union for the Conservation of Nature (IUCN), it is imperative that all available tools be used to understand the biodiversity, habitat suitability, climate change impacts and population viability of cacti. Within the Cactaceae, Mammillaria Haw and the closely related genus Cochemiea (K. Brandegee) Walton of Baja California, Mexico, are species-rich, with 46 regionally endemic taxa, 12 of which have been assessed as threatened or endangered by the IUCN. This study clarifies the evolutionary relationships in the Mammilloid clade, a complex and species-rich clade in tribe Cacteae, and generic circumscription of the genera Mammillaria Haw. and Cochemiea (K. Brandegee) Walton, estimates divergence times, diversification rates and ancestral ranges and explores habitat suitability and the risk of extinction of a representative species within these genera. The r species, Cochemiea halei (K. Brandegee) Walton, a narrowly distributed island endemic, is assessed using species distribution modeling (SDM) and population viability analysis (PVA). SDM in this study includes projections to two climate change scenarios over the next century, using four representative particle concentration pathways, and the PVA uses habitat-specific deterministic and stochastic models. The results of molecular phylogenetic analyses of the Mammilloid cladde restore the genus Mammillaria to monophyly via new combinations in the genus Cochemiea. The taxa in this study are shown to be of recent origin resulting from rapid diversification and radiation. Geological and climatic forces at multiple scales appear to be responsible for the high degree of biodiversity and endemism of these cacti. SDM shows that C. halei is likely to be stranded in its fragmented island habitat, has a facultative adaptation to ultramafic soils, and faces a 21%–53% contraction of its range on the islands under climate change scenarios. PVA suggests that C. halei is at increased risk of extinction in response to slight decreases in fecundity and persistence. In general, the perspectives in this dissertation fill several gaps in our prior knowledge of the evolution, biogeography, and conservation pressures of an important, species-rich group of cacti, occurring in a region of high biodiversity and endemism.
ContributorsBreslin, Peter (Author) / Wojciechowski, Martin F (Thesis advisor) / Albuquerque, Fabio (Committee member) / Fehlberg, Shannon (Committee member) / Majure, Lucas (Committee member) / Rebman, Jon (Committee member) / Arizona State University (Publisher)
Created2020
Description
Biogeography places the geographical distribution of biodiversity in an evolutionary context. Ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae), being a group of ubiquitous, ecologically dominant, and diverse insects, are useful model systems to understand the evolutionary origins and mechanisms of biogeographical patterns across spatial scales. On a global scale, ants have been used to test hypotheses on the origin and maintenance of the remarkably consistent latitudinal diversity gradient where biodiversity peaks in the equatorial tropics and decreases towards the poles. Additionally, ants have been used to posit and test theories of island biogeography such as the mechanisms of the species-area relationship, being the increase of biodiversity with cumulative land area. However, there are still unanswered questions about ant biogeography such as how specialized life histories contribute to their global biogeographical patterns. Furthermore, there remain island systems in the world’s biodiversity hotspots that harbor much less ant species than predicted by the species-area relationship, which potentially suggests a place ripe for discovery. In this dissertation, I use natural history, taxonomic, geographic, and phylogenetic data to study ant biodiversity and biogeography across spatial scales. First, I study the global biodiversity and biogeography of a specialized set of symbiotic interactions between ant species, here referred to as myrmecosymbioses, with an emphasis on social parasitism where one species exploits the parental care behavior and social colony environment of another species. In addition to characterizing a new myrmecosymbiosis, I use a global biogeographic and phylogenetic dataset to show that ant social parasitism is distributed along an inverse latitudinal diversity gradient where species richness and independent evolutionary origins of social parasitism peak within the northern hemisphere where the least free-living ant diversity exists. Second, I study the unexplored ant fauna of the Vanuatuan archipelago in the South Pacific. Using approximately 10,000 Vanuatuan ant specimens coupled with phylogenomics, I fill in a historical knowledge gap of South Pacific ant biogeography and demonstrate that the Vanuatuan ant fauna is a novel biodiversity hotspot. With these studies, I provide insights into how specialized life histories and unique island biotas shape the global distribution of biodiversity in different ways, especially in the ants.
ContributorsGray, Kyle William (Author) / Rabeling, Christian (Thesis advisor) / Martins, Emilia (Committee member) / Taylor, Jesse (Committee member) / Pratt, Stephen (Committee member) / Wojciechowski, Martin (Committee member) / Arizona State University (Publisher)
Created2023
Description
There is an ongoing debate around the extent that anthropogenic processes influence both plant species distribution dynamics and plant biodiversity patterns. Past human food use may leave a strong legacy on not only the extent that food plants are dispersed and fill their potential geographic ranges, but also on food plant species richness in areas that have been densely populated by humans through time. The persistent legacy of plant domestication on contemporary species composition has been suggested to be significant in some regions. However, little is known about the effects that past human food use has had on the biogeography of the Sonoran Desert despite its rich cultural diversity and species richness. I used a combination of ecoinformatics, ethnobotanical, and archaeological data sources to quantitatively assess the impacts of pre-Columbian, and in some cases, more recent, human-mediated dispersal of food plants on the Sonoran Desert landscape. I found that (i) food plants do fill more of their potential geographic ranges than their un-used congeners, and that polyploidy, growth form, and life form are correlated with range filling and past food usage. I also found that (ii) both pre-Columbian and contemporary human population presence are correlated with relative food plant species richness. Thus, both past human food use and contemporary human activities may have influenced the geographic distribution of food plants at regional scales as well as species richness patterns. My research emphasizes that there is an interplay between ecological and anthropogenic processes, and that, therefore, humans must be considered as part of the landscape and included in ecological models.
ContributorsFlower, Carolyn (Author) / Blonder, Benjamin (Thesis advisor) / Hodgson, Wendy (Committee member) / Peeples, Matthew (Committee member) / Salywon, Andrew (Committee member) / Arizona State University (Publisher)
Created2019