Matching Items (2)
Filtering by

Clear all filters

134150-Thumbnail Image.png
Description
This research investigated deionized water contact angle measurement reliability with alumina powder using the Washburn method. This method relates the capillary rise of a liquid through a column of packed powder to the contact angle of the system. A reference liquid that is assumed to be perfectly wetting, such as

This research investigated deionized water contact angle measurement reliability with alumina powder using the Washburn method. This method relates the capillary rise of a liquid through a column of packed powder to the contact angle of the system. A reference liquid that is assumed to be perfectly wetting, such as hexane due to the low surface energy, must be used to compare to the tested liquid. Consistency was hypothesized to be achieved with more powder structure and consistency of packing between reference and test trials. The three types of packing structures explored in this study were unstructured, visually-structured (user tapped), and machine-structured tapping. It was also hypothesized that similar contact angle results would be found for different packing methods of the same powder and liquid. However, the average contact angle for unstructured packing was found to be 32.9°, while the angle for the tapped structure was only 11.7°. This large deviation between types of packing shows that there are more inconsistencies with the use of this method than just the regulation of the packing structure. There were two similar glass chromatography columns used, but the second column experienced an unknown interference that led to a delay in the hexane uptake into the powder, which then led to invalid contact angle calculations. There was no discernible relationship between the packing structure and the standard deviation between trials, so the more structured packing does not seem to affect the consistency of results. It is recommended to perform more experiments on a single packing type with different apparatuses and a narrower particle size range.
ContributorsConvery, Brittany Alexis (Author) / Emady, Heather (Thesis director) / Vajrala, Spandana (Committee member) / Chemical Engineering Program (Contributor) / Barrett, The Honors College (Contributor)
Created2017-12
135185-Thumbnail Image.png
Description
The wettability of powders is an important characteristic for both industry and academia and is often described by the powder’s contact angle with a certain liquid. While there exist many ways to measure contact angle, it is a portion of the powder technology field that is not fully understood and

The wettability of powders is an important characteristic for both industry and academia and is often described by the powder’s contact angle with a certain liquid. While there exist many ways to measure contact angle, it is a portion of the powder technology field that is not fully understood and requires more investigation and research. This study investigates two methods for measuring contact angle, the sessile drop method and the Washburn method, and looks to compare results to determine which method offers the most reliable data in terms of accuracy and repeatability. Two powders - microcrystalline cellulose and aluminum oxide - and three liquids - water, 50 cSt silicone oil, and 350 cSt silicone oil - were used to study the differences between the two measurement techniques as well as the effects of varying fluid viscosity on the measurements. It was found that the sessile drop method proved to be an ineffective method for measuring contact angle when liquid penetration into the powder occurred, as the contact angle changed while the drop penetrated. Initial results showed the contact angle for silicone oil on the powders to be greater than 90°, indicating nonwetting of the surface which was inconsistent with observations. The results from the Washburn method align better with other values in similar studies, but more study is needed to confirm the results gathered in this research.
ContributorsSmith, Bryan Alexander (Author) / Emady, Heather (Thesis director) / Rykaczewski, Konrad (Committee member) / Chemical Engineering Program (Contributor) / Barrett, The Honors College (Contributor)
Created2016-05