Matching Items (2)
Filtering by

Clear all filters

157292-Thumbnail Image.png
Description
Autonomic closure is a new general methodology for subgrid closures in large eddy simulations that circumvents the need to specify fixed closure models and instead allows a fully- adaptive self-optimizing closure. The closure is autonomic in the sense that the simulation itself determines the optimal relation at each point and

Autonomic closure is a new general methodology for subgrid closures in large eddy simulations that circumvents the need to specify fixed closure models and instead allows a fully- adaptive self-optimizing closure. The closure is autonomic in the sense that the simulation itself determines the optimal relation at each point and time between any subgrid term and the variables in the simulation, through the solution of a local system identification problem. It is based on highly generalized representations of subgrid terms having degrees of freedom that are determined dynamically at each point and time in the simulation. This can be regarded as a very high-dimensional generalization of the dynamic approach used with some traditional prescribed closure models, or as a type of “data-driven” turbulence closure in which machine- learning methods are used with internal training data obtained at a test-filter scale at each point and time in the simulation to discover the local closure representation.

In this study, a priori tests were performed to develop accurate and efficient implementations of autonomic closure based on particular generalized representations and parameters associated with the local system identification of the turbulence state. These included the relative number of training points and bounding box size, which impact computational cost and generalizability of coefficients in the representation from the test scale to the LES scale. The focus was on studying impacts of these factors on the resulting accuracy and efficiency of autonomic closure for the subgrid stress. Particular attention was paid to the associated subgrid production field, including its structural features in which large forward and backward energy transfer are concentrated.

More than five orders of magnitude reduction in computational cost of autonomic closure was achieved in this study with essentially no loss of accuracy, primarily by using efficient frame-invariant forms for generalized representations that greatly reduce the number of degrees of freedom. The recommended form is a 28-coefficient representation that provides subgrid stress and production fields that are far more accurate in terms of structure and statistics than are traditional prescribed closure models.
ContributorsKshitij, Abhinav (Author) / Dahm, Werner J.A. (Thesis advisor) / Herrmann, Marcus (Committee member) / Hamlington, Peter E (Committee member) / Peet, Yulia (Committee member) / Kim, Jeonglae (Committee member) / Arizona State University (Publisher)
Created2019
158804-Thumbnail Image.png
Description
Autonomic closure is a recently-proposed subgrid closure methodology for large eddy simulation (LES) that replaces the prescribed subgrid models used in traditional LES closure with highly generalized representations of subgrid terms and solution of a local system identification problem that allows the simulation itself to determine the local relation between

Autonomic closure is a recently-proposed subgrid closure methodology for large eddy simulation (LES) that replaces the prescribed subgrid models used in traditional LES closure with highly generalized representations of subgrid terms and solution of a local system identification problem that allows the simulation itself to determine the local relation between each subgrid term and the resolved variables at every point and time. The present study demonstrates, for the first time, practical LES based on fully dynamic implementation of autonomic closure for the subgrid stress and the subgrid scalar flux. It leverages the inherent computational efficiency of tensorally-correct generalized representations in terms of parametric quantities, and uses the fundamental representation theory of Smith (1971) to develop complete and minimal tensorally-correct representations for the subgrid stress and scalar flux. It then assesses the accuracy of these representations via a priori tests, and compares with the corresponding accuracy from nonparametric representations and from traditional prescribed subgrid models. It then assesses the computational stability of autonomic closure with these tensorally-correct parametric representations, via forward simulations with a high-order pseudo-spectral code, including the extent to which any added stabilization is needed to ensure computational stability, and compares with the added stabilization needed in traditional closure with prescribed subgrid models. Further, it conducts a posteriori tests based on forward simulations of turbulent conserved scalar mixing with the same pseudo-spectral code, in which velocity and scalar statistics from autonomic closure with these representations are compared with corresponding statistics from traditional closure using prescribed models, and with corresponding statistics of filtered fields from direct numerical simulation (DNS). These comparisons show substantially greater accuracy from autonomic closure than from traditional closure. This study demonstrates that fully dynamic autonomic closure is a practical approach for LES that requires accuracy even at the smallest resolved scales.
ContributorsStallcup, Eric Warren (Author) / Dahm, Werner J.A. (Thesis advisor) / Herrmann, Marcus (Committee member) / Calhoun, Ronald (Committee member) / Kim, Jeonglae (Committee member) / Kostelich, Eric J. (Committee member) / Arizona State University (Publisher)
Created2020