The majority of trust research has focused on the benefits trust can have for individual actors, institutions, and organizations. This “optimistic bias” is particularly evident in work focused on institutional trust, where concepts such as procedural justice, shared values, and moral responsibility have gained prominence. But trust in institutions may not be exclusively good. We reveal implications for the “dark side” of institutional trust by reviewing relevant theories and empirical research that can contribute to a more holistic understanding. We frame our discussion by suggesting there may be a “Goldilocks principle” of institutional trust, where trust that is too low (typically the focus) or too high (not usually considered by trust researchers) may be problematic. The chapter focuses on the issue of too-high trust and processes through which such too-high trust might emerge. Specifically, excessive trust might result from external, internal, and intersecting external-internal processes. External processes refer to the actions institutions take that affect public trust, while internal processes refer to intrapersonal factors affecting a trustor’s level of trust. We describe how the beneficial psychological and behavioral outcomes of trust can be mitigated or circumvented through these processes and highlight the implications of a “darkest” side of trust when they intersect. We draw upon research on organizations and legal, governmental, and political systems to demonstrate the dark side of trust in different contexts. The conclusion outlines directions for future research and encourages researchers to consider the ethical nuances of studying how to increase institutional trust.

As the search for life in our universe grows, it is important to not only locate planets outside of our solar system, but also to work towards the ability to understand and characterize their nature. Many current research endeavors focus on the discovery of exoplanets throughout the surrounding universe; however, we still know very little about the characteristics of these exoplanets themselves, particularly their atmospheres. Observatories, such as the Hubble Space Telescope and the Spitzer Space Telescope, have made some of the first observations which revealed information about the atmospheres of exoplanets but have yet to acquire complete and detailed characterizations of exoplanet atmospheres. The EXoplanet Climate Infrared TElescope (EXCITE) is a mission specifically designed to target key information about the atmospheres of exoplanets - including the global and spatially resolved energy budget, chemical bulk-compositions, vertical temperature profiles and circulation patterns across the surface, energy distribution efficiency as a function of equilibrium temperatures, and cloud formation and distribution - in order to generate dynamic and detailed atmospheric characterizations. EXCITE will use phase-resolved transit spectroscopy in the 1-4 micron wavelength range to accomplish these science goals, so it is important that the EXCITE spectrograph system is designed and tested to meet these observational requirements. For my thesis, I present my research on the EXCITE mission science goals and the design of the EXCITE spectrograph system to meet these goals, along with the work I have done in the beginning stages of testing the EXCITE spectrograph system in the lab. The primary result of my research work is the preparation of a simple optics setup in the lab to prepare a laser light source for use in the EXCITE spectrograph system - comparable to the preparation of incoming light by the EXCITE telescope system - which successfully yields an F# = 12.9 and a spot size of s = 39 ± 7 microns. These results meet the expectations of the system and convey appropriate preparation of a light source to begin the assembly and testing of the EXCITE spectrograph optics in the lab.