Matching Items (3)
Filtering by
- All Subjects: Problem Solving
- Creators: Goldinger, Stephen
Description
In the daily life of an individual problems of varying difficulty are encountered.
Each problem may include a different number of constraints placed upon the problem
solver. One type of problem commonly used in research are multiply-constrained
problems, such as the compound remote associates. Since their development they have
been related to creativity and insight. Moreover, research has been conducted to
determine the cognitive abilities underlying problem solving abilities. We sought to fully
evaluate the range of cognitive abilities (i.e., working memory, episodic and semantic
memory, and fluid and crystallized intelligence) linked to multiply-constrained problem
solving. Additionally, we sought to determine whether problem solving ability and
strategies (analytical or insightful) were task specific or domain general through the use
of novel problem solving tasks (TriBond and Location Bond). Results indicated that
multiply-constrained problem solving abilities were domain general, solutions derived
through insightful strategies were more often correct than analytical, and crystallized
intelligence was the only cognitive ability that provided unique predictive value.
Each problem may include a different number of constraints placed upon the problem
solver. One type of problem commonly used in research are multiply-constrained
problems, such as the compound remote associates. Since their development they have
been related to creativity and insight. Moreover, research has been conducted to
determine the cognitive abilities underlying problem solving abilities. We sought to fully
evaluate the range of cognitive abilities (i.e., working memory, episodic and semantic
memory, and fluid and crystallized intelligence) linked to multiply-constrained problem
solving. Additionally, we sought to determine whether problem solving ability and
strategies (analytical or insightful) were task specific or domain general through the use
of novel problem solving tasks (TriBond and Location Bond). Results indicated that
multiply-constrained problem solving abilities were domain general, solutions derived
through insightful strategies were more often correct than analytical, and crystallized
intelligence was the only cognitive ability that provided unique predictive value.
ContributorsEllis, Derek M (Author) / Brewer, Gene A. (Thesis advisor) / Homa, Donald (Committee member) / Goldinger, Stephen (Committee member) / Arizona State University (Publisher)
Created2019
Description
In this study, the oppositional processes theory was proposed to suggest that reliance on semantic and episodic memory systems hinder originality during idea generation for divergent thinking tasks that are generally used to assess creative potential. In order to investigate the proposed oppositional processes theory, three experiments that manipulated the memory accessibility in participants during the alternative uses tasks were conducted. Experiment 1 directly instructed participants to either generate usages based on memory or not from memory; Experiment 2 provided participants with object cues that were either very common or very rare in daily life (i.e., bottle vs. canteen); Experiment 3 replicated the same manipulation from Experiment 2 with much longer generation time (10 minutes in Experiment 2 vs. 30 minutes in Experiment 3). The oppositional processes theory predicted that participants who had less access to direct and unaltered usages (i.e., told to not use memory, were given rare cues, or were outputting items later in the generation period) during the task would be more creative. Results generally supported the predictions in Experiments 1 and 2 where participants from conditions which limited their access to memory generated more novel usages that were considered more creative by independent coders. Such effects were less prominent in Experiment 3 with extended generation time but the trends remained the same.
ContributorsXu, Dongchen (Author) / Brewer, Gene (Thesis advisor) / Glenberg, Arthur (Committee member) / Homa, Donald (Committee member) / Goldinger, Stephen (Committee member) / Arizona State University (Publisher)
Created2017
Description
Individuals encounter problems daily wherein varying numbers of constraints require delimitation of memory to target goal-satisfying information. Multiply-constrained problems, such as compound remote associates, are commonly used to study this type of problem solving. Since their development, multiply-constrained problems have been theoretically and empirically related to creative thinking, analytical problem solving, insight problem solving, intelligence, and a multitude of other cognitive abilities. Critically, in order to correctly solve a multiply-constrained problem the solver must have the solution available in memory and be able to target and access to that information. Experiment 1 determined that the cue – target relationship affects the likelihood that a problem is solved. Moreover, Experiment 2 identified that the association between cues and targets predicted inter- & intra-individual differences in multiply-constrained problem solving. Lastly, Experiment 3 found monetary incentives failed to improve problem solving performance likely due to knowledge serving as a limiting factor on performance. Additionally, problem solvers were shown to be able to reliably assess the likelihood they would solve a problem. Taken together all three studies demonstrated the importance of knowledge & knowledge structures on problem solving performance.
ContributorsEllis, Derek (Author) / Brewer, Gene A (Thesis advisor) / Homa, Donald (Committee member) / Blais, Chris (Committee member) / Goldinger, Stephen (Committee member) / Arizona State University (Publisher)
Created2021