Matching Items (2)
Filtering by

Clear all filters

149135-Thumbnail Image.png
Description

Restoration of riverine ecosystems is often stated as a management objective for regulated rivers, and floods are one of the most effective tools for accomplishing restoration. The National Re- search Council (NRC 1992) argued that ecological restoration means re- turning "an ecosystem to a close approximation of its condition prior

Restoration of riverine ecosystems is often stated as a management objective for regulated rivers, and floods are one of the most effective tools for accomplishing restoration. The National Re- search Council (NRC 1992) argued that ecological restoration means re- turning "an ecosystem to a close approximation of its condition prior to disturbance" and that "restoring altered, damaged, O f destroyed lakes, rivers, and wetlands is a high-priority task." Effective restoration must be based on a clear definition of the value of riverine resources to society; on scientific studies that document ecosystem status and provide an understanding of ecosystem processes and resource interactions; on scientific studies that predict, mea- sure, and monitor the effectiveness of restoration techniques; and on engineering and economic studies that evaluate societal costs and benefits of restoration.

In the case of some large rivers, restoration is not a self-evident goal. Indeed, restoration may be impossible; a more feasible goal may be rehabilitation of some ecosystem components and processes in parts of the river (Gore and Shields 1995, Kondolfand Wilcock 1996, Stanford et al. 1996). In other cases, the appropriate decision may be to do nothing. The decision to manipulate ecosystem processes and components involves not only a scientific judgment that a restored or rehabilitated condition is achievable, but also a value judgment that this condition is more desirable than the status quo. These judgments involve prioritizing different river resources, and they should be based on extensive and continuing public debate.

In this article, we examine the appropriate role of science in determining whether or not to restore or rehabilitate the Colorado River in the Grand Canyon by summarizing studies carried out by numerous agencies, universities, and consulting firms since 1983. This reach of the Colorado extends 425 km between Glen Canyon Dam and Lake Mead reservoir (Figure 1). Efforts to manipulate ecosystem processes and components in the Grand Canyon have received widespread public attention, such as the 1996 controlled flood released from Glen Canyon Dam and the proposal to drain Lake Powell reservoir.

ContributorsSchmidt, John C. (Author) / Webb, Robert H. (Author) / Valdez, Richard A. (Author) / Marzolf, G. Richard (Author) / Stevens, Lawrence E. (Author)
Created1998-09
161911-Thumbnail Image.png
Description
Though the connection between terrestrial riparian consumers and the adjacent aquatic food web has been well-studied in a variety of systems, gaps with respect to several habitats remain. The Colorado River Basin represents many of these untested habitat characteristics: it contains large, controlled rivers in an arid environment that are

Though the connection between terrestrial riparian consumers and the adjacent aquatic food web has been well-studied in a variety of systems, gaps with respect to several habitats remain. The Colorado River Basin represents many of these untested habitat characteristics: it contains large, controlled rivers in an arid environment that are often canyon-bound. These characteristics, however, are not unique to the Colorado River Basin. Dams and arid lands are becoming increasingly common around the world, stressing the importance of understanding the function of riparian areas within the Colorado River Basin and basins like it. Stable isotopes, including the more recent application of deuterium, can be used to elucidate trophic linkages between rivers and their riparia. Though dams may harm aquatic insect populations, it is possible that they also make aquatic insects a stable, constant food source to the riparian biological community. This dissertation demonstrates that aquatic emergent insects are a reliable, and therefore important, food source for arid land riparian consumers along regulated rivers. However, the importance of aquatic emergent insects to riparian consumers may vary across sites, even within the same river basin. To explore this variation, the diet of a common riparian lizard species Urosaurus ornatus (Ornate Tree Lizard) can be used as an indicator of cross-ecosystem connectivity. This dissertation demonstrates linkages between two differing river segments and U. ornatus, showcasing its ability as an indicator of connectivity across a diversity of systems. Within the Colorado River Basin, the Grand Canyon provides an opportunity to study a variety of riparian consumers across a gradient of habitat parameters and dam effects. This dissertation demonstrates the manifold connections between large, regulated rivers and arid riparian consumers, ranging from lizards, to bats, to, for the first time, mice. Monsoons have differing effects on river-riparian communities in this basin, potentially related to intact tributary confluences. Lastly, this dissertation demonstrates that hydropeaking reduces river-riparia connectivity by reducing aquatic insect emergence. This dissertation seeks to improve understanding of the linkages between river and their riparia to aid in the management of arid riparian areas affected by dams worldwide.
ContributorsLupoli, Christina Alexandra (Author) / Sabo, John L (Thesis advisor) / DeNardo, Dale F (Committee member) / Kennedy, Theodore A (Committee member) / Muehlbauer, Jeffrey D (Committee member) / Yackulic, Charles B (Committee member) / Arizona State University (Publisher)
Created2021