Matching Items (2)
Filtering by
- All Subjects: Algorithms
- Genre: Masters Thesis
- Creators: Shrivastava, Aviral
Description
Performance improvements have largely followed Moore's Law due to the help from technology scaling. In order to continue improving performance, power-efficiency must be reduced. Better technology has improved power-efficiency, but this has a limit. Multi-core architectures have been shown to be an additional aid to this crusade of increased power-efficiency. Accelerators are growing in popularity as the next means of achieving power-efficient performance. Accelerators such as Intel SSE are ideal, but prove difficult to program. FPGAs, on the other hand, are less efficient due to their fine-grained reconfigurability. A middle ground is found in CGRAs, which are highly power-efficient, but largely programmable accelerators. Power-efficiencies of 100s of GOPs/W have been estimated, more than 2 orders of magnitude greater than current processors. Currently, CGRAs are limited in their applicability due to their ability to only accelerate a single thread at a time. This limitation becomes especially apparent as multi-core/multi-threaded processors have moved into the mainstream. This limitation is removed by enabling multi-threading on CGRAs through a software-oriented approach. The key capability in this solution is enabling quick run-time transformation of schedules to execute on targeted portions of the CGRA. This allows the CGRA to be shared among multiple threads simultaneously. Analysis shows that enabling multi-threading has very small costs but provides very large benefits (less than 1% single-threaded performance loss but nearly 300% CGRA throughput increase). By increasing dynamism of CGRA scheduling, system performance is shown to increase overall system performance of an optimized system by almost 350% over that of a single-threaded CGRA and nearly 20x faster than the same system with no CGRA in a highly threaded environment.
ContributorsPager, Jared (Author) / Shrivastava, Aviral (Thesis advisor) / Gupta, Sandeep (Committee member) / Speyer, Gil (Committee member) / Arizona State University (Publisher)
Created2011
Description
Soft errors are considered as a key reliability challenge for sub-nano scale transistors. An ideal solution for such a challenge should ultimately eliminate the effect of soft errors from the microprocessor. While forward recovery techniques achieve fast recovery from errors by simply voting out the wrong values, they incur the overhead of three copies execution. Backward recovery techniques only need two copies of execution, but suffer from check-pointing overhead.
In this work I explored the efficiency of integrating check-pointing into the application and the effectiveness of recovery that can be performed upon it. After evaluating the available fine-grained approaches to perform recovery, I am introducing InCheck, an in-application recovery scheme that can be integrated into instruction-duplication based techniques, thus providing a fast error recovery. The proposed technique makes light-weight checkpoints at the basic-block granularity, and uses them for recovery purposes.
To evaluate the effectiveness of the proposed technique, 10,000 fault injection experiments were performed on different hardware components of a modern ARM in-order simulated processor. InCheck was able to recover from all detected errors by replaying about 20 instructions, however, the state of the art recovery scheme failed more than 200 times.
In this work I explored the efficiency of integrating check-pointing into the application and the effectiveness of recovery that can be performed upon it. After evaluating the available fine-grained approaches to perform recovery, I am introducing InCheck, an in-application recovery scheme that can be integrated into instruction-duplication based techniques, thus providing a fast error recovery. The proposed technique makes light-weight checkpoints at the basic-block granularity, and uses them for recovery purposes.
To evaluate the effectiveness of the proposed technique, 10,000 fault injection experiments were performed on different hardware components of a modern ARM in-order simulated processor. InCheck was able to recover from all detected errors by replaying about 20 instructions, however, the state of the art recovery scheme failed more than 200 times.
ContributorsLokam, Sai Ram Dheeraj (Author) / Shrivastava, Aviral (Thesis advisor) / Clark, Lawrence T (Committee member) / Mubayi, Anuj (Committee member) / Arizona State University (Publisher)
Created2016