Matching Items (3)
Filtering by

Clear all filters

151945-Thumbnail Image.png
Description
In recent years we have witnessed a shift towards multi-processor system-on-chips (MPSoCs) to address the demands of embedded devices (such as cell phones, GPS devices, luxury car features, etc.). Highly optimized MPSoCs are well-suited to tackle the complex application demands desired by the end user customer. These MPSoCs incorporate a

In recent years we have witnessed a shift towards multi-processor system-on-chips (MPSoCs) to address the demands of embedded devices (such as cell phones, GPS devices, luxury car features, etc.). Highly optimized MPSoCs are well-suited to tackle the complex application demands desired by the end user customer. These MPSoCs incorporate a constellation of heterogeneous processing elements (PEs) (general purpose PEs and application-specific integrated circuits (ASICS)). A typical MPSoC will be composed of a application processor, such as an ARM Coretex-A9 with cache coherent memory hierarchy, and several application sub-systems. Each of these sub-systems are composed of highly optimized instruction processors, graphics/DSP processors, and custom hardware accelerators. Typically, these sub-systems utilize scratchpad memories (SPM) rather than support cache coherency. The overall architecture is an integration of the various sub-systems through a high bandwidth system-level interconnect (such as a Network-on-Chip (NoC)). The shift to MPSoCs has been fueled by three major factors: demand for high performance, the use of component libraries, and short design turn around time. As customers continue to desire more and more complex applications on their embedded devices the performance demand for these devices continues to increase. Designers have turned to using MPSoCs to address this demand. By using pre-made IP libraries designers can quickly piece together a MPSoC that will meet the application demands of the end user with minimal time spent designing new hardware. Additionally, the use of MPSoCs allows designers to generate new devices very quickly and thus reducing the time to market. In this work, a complete MPSoC synthesis design flow is presented. We first present a technique \cite{leary1_intro} to address the synthesis of the interconnect architecture (particularly Network-on-Chip (NoC)). We then address the synthesis of the memory architecture of a MPSoC sub-system \cite{leary2_intro}. Lastly, we present a co-synthesis technique to generate the functional and memory architectures simultaneously. The validity and quality of each synthesis technique is demonstrated through extensive experimentation.
ContributorsLeary, Glenn (Author) / Chatha, Karamvir S (Thesis advisor) / Vrudhula, Sarma (Committee member) / Shrivastava, Aviral (Committee member) / Beraha, Rudy (Committee member) / Arizona State University (Publisher)
Created2013
157060-Thumbnail Image.png
Description
Automated driving systems are in an intensive research and development stage, and the companies developing these systems are targeting to deploy them on public roads in a very near future. Guaranteeing safe operation of these systems is crucial as they are planned to carry passengers and share the road with

Automated driving systems are in an intensive research and development stage, and the companies developing these systems are targeting to deploy them on public roads in a very near future. Guaranteeing safe operation of these systems is crucial as they are planned to carry passengers and share the road with other vehicles and pedestrians. Yet, there is no agreed-upon approach on how and in what detail those systems should be tested. Different organizations have different testing approaches, and one common approach is to combine simulation-based testing with real-world driving.

One of the expectations from fully-automated vehicles is never to cause an accident. However, an automated vehicle may not be able to avoid all collisions, e.g., the collisions caused by other road occupants. Hence, it is important for the system designers to understand the boundary case scenarios where an autonomous vehicle can no longer avoid a collision. Besides safety, there are other expectations from automated vehicles such as comfortable driving and minimal fuel consumption. All safety and functional expectations from an automated driving system should be captured with a set of system requirements. It is challenging to create requirements that are unambiguous and usable for the design, testing, and evaluation of automated driving systems. Another challenge is to define useful metrics for assessing the testing quality because in general, it is impossible to test every possible scenario.

The goal of this dissertation is to formalize the theory for testing automated vehicles. Various methods for automatic test generation for automated-driving systems in simulation environments are presented and compared. The contributions presented in this dissertation include (i) new metrics that can be used to discover the boundary cases between safe and unsafe driving conditions, (ii) a new approach that combines combinatorial testing and optimization-guided test generation methods, (iii) approaches that utilize global optimization methods and random exploration to generate critical vehicle and pedestrian trajectories for testing purposes, (iv) a publicly-available simulation-based automated vehicle testing framework that enables application of the existing testing approaches in the literature, including the new approaches presented in this dissertation.
ContributorsTuncali, Cumhur Erkan (Author) / Fainekos, Georgios (Thesis advisor) / Ben Amor, Heni (Committee member) / Kapinski, James (Committee member) / Shrivastava, Aviral (Committee member) / Arizona State University (Publisher)
Created2019
161988-Thumbnail Image.png
Description
Autonomous Vehicles (AV) are inevitable entities in future mobility systems thatdemand safety and adaptability as two critical factors in replacing/assisting human drivers. Safety arises in defining, standardizing, quantifying, and monitoring requirements for all autonomous components. Adaptability, on the other hand, involves efficient handling of uncertainty and inconsistencies in models and data. First, I

Autonomous Vehicles (AV) are inevitable entities in future mobility systems thatdemand safety and adaptability as two critical factors in replacing/assisting human drivers. Safety arises in defining, standardizing, quantifying, and monitoring requirements for all autonomous components. Adaptability, on the other hand, involves efficient handling of uncertainty and inconsistencies in models and data. First, I address safety by presenting a search-based test-case generation framework that can be used in training and testing deep-learning components of AV. Next, to address adaptability, I propose a framework based on multi-valued linear temporal logic syntax and semantics that allows autonomous agents to perform model-checking on systems with uncertainties. The search-based test-case generation framework provides safety assurance guarantees through formalizing and monitoring Responsibility Sensitive Safety (RSS) rules. I use the RSS rules in signal temporal logic as qualification specifications for monitoring and screening the quality of generated test-drive scenarios. Furthermore, to extend the existing temporal-based formal languages’ expressivity, I propose a new spatio-temporal perception logic that enables formalizing qualification specifications for perception systems. All-in-one, my test-generation framework can be used for reasoning about the quality of perception, prediction, and decision-making components in AV. Finally, my efforts resulted in publicly available software. One is an offline monitoring algorithm based on the proposed logic to reason about the quality of perception systems. The other is an optimal planner (model checker) that accepts mission specifications and model descriptions in the form of multi-valued logic and multi-valued sets, respectively. My monitoring framework is distributed with the publicly available S-TaLiRo and Sim-ATAV tools.
ContributorsHekmatnejad, Mohammad (Author) / Fainekos, Georgios (Thesis advisor) / Deshmukh, Jyotirmoy V (Committee member) / Karam, Lina (Committee member) / Pedrielli, Giulia (Committee member) / Shrivastava, Aviral (Committee member) / Yang, Yezhou (Committee member) / Arizona State University (Publisher)
Created2021