Filtering by
- Status: Published
One approach to develop new tools for stem cell transplants may be to look towards the endogenous repair response for inspiration. Specifically, activated cell types surrounding the injury secrete the chemokine stromal cell-derived factor-1α (SDF-1α), which has been shown to play a critical role in recruiting endogenous neural progenitor/stem cells (NPSCs) to the site of injury. Therefore, it was hypothesized that improving NPSC response to SDF-1α may be a viable mechanism for improving NPSC transplant retention and migration into the surrounding host tissue. To this end, work presented here has 1. identified critical extracellular signals that mediate the NPSC response to SDF-1α, 2. incorporated these findings into the development of a transplantation platform that increases NPSC responsiveness to SDF-1α and 3. observed increased NPSC responsiveness to local exogenous SDF-1α signaling following transplantation within our novel system. Future work will include studies investigating NSPC response to endogenous, injury-induced SDF-1α and the application of this work to understanding differences between stem cell sources and their implications in cell therapies.
Growing evidence suggests a relationship between SDF-1α/CXCR4 signaling and endogenous neural progenitor/stem cells (NPSC)-mediated regeneration after neural injury. Long-term modulation of the SDF-1α/CXCR4 signaling axis is thus hypothesized as a possible avenue for harnessing and amplifying endogenous regenerative mechanisms after TBI. In order to understand how the SDF-1α/CXCR4 signaling can be modulated in vivo, we first developed and characterized a sustained protein delivery platform in vitro. We were the first, to our knowledge, to demonstrate that protein release profiles from poly(D,L,-lactic-co-glycolic) acid (PLGA) particles can be tuned independent of particle fabrication parameters via centrifugal fractioning. This process of physically separating the particles altered the average diameter of a particle population, which is in turn was correlated to critical release characteristics. Secondly, we demonstrated sustained release of SDF-1α from PLGA/fibrin composites (particles embedded in fibrin) with tunable burst release as a function of fibrin concentration. Finally, we contrasted the spatiotemporal localization of endogenous SDF-1α and CXCR4 expression in response to either bolus or sustained release of exogenous SDF-1α. Sustained release of exogenous SDF-1α induced spatially diffuse endogenous SDF-1/CXCR4 expression relative to bolus SDF-1 administration; however, the observed effects were transient in both cases, persisting only to a maximum of 3 days post injection. These studies will inform future systematic evaluations of strategies that exploit SDF-1α/CXCR4 signaling for diverse applications.
Lab-grown food products of animal cell origin, now becoming popularly coined as, ‘Cellular Agriculture’ is a revolutionary breakthrough technology that has the potential to penetrate the lives of every American or citizen of the world. It is important to recognize that the impetus for developing this technology is fueled by environmental concerns with climate change, rising geopolitical instability, and population growth projections, where farm-grown food has now become a growing national security issue. Notwithstanding its potential, in addition to the necessary technological innovation and economic scalability, the market success of cellular agriculture will depend greatly on regulatory oversight by multiple government agencies without which it can cause undue harm to individuals, populations, and the environment. Thus, it is critical for those appropriate United States governing bodies to ensure that the technology being developed is both safe and of an acceptable quality for human consumption and has no adverse environmental impact. As such, animal foods, derived from farms, previously regulated almost exclusively by the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) are now being regulated under a joint formal agreement between the US Food and Drug Administration (US FDA) and the USDA if derived from the lab, i.e., lab-grown animal foods. The main reason for joint oversight between the FDA and the USDA is that the FDA has developed the in-house expertise to oversee primary cell harvesting and cell storage, as well as, cell growth and differentiation for the development of 3D-engineered tissues intended for tissue and organ replacement for the emerging field of regenerative medicine. As such, the FDA has been given the authority to oversee the ‘front end’ of lab-grown food processes which relies on the very same processes utilized in engineered human tissues to produce food-grade engineered tissues. Oversight then transitions to the USDA-FSIS (Food Safety and Inspection Service) during the harvesting stage of the cell culture process. The USDA-FSIS then oversees the further production and labeling of these products. Included in the agreement is the understanding that both bodies are responsible for communicating necessary information to each other and collaboratively developing new regulatory actions as needed. However, there currently lacks clarity on some topics regarding certain legal, ethical, and scientific issues. Lab-grown meat products require more extensive regulation than farm-grown animal food products to ensure that they are safe and nutritious for consumption. To do this, CFSAN can create new classes of lab-grown foods, such as ‘lab-grown USDA foods,’ ‘lab-grown non-USDA foods,’ ‘lab-grown extinct foods,’ ‘lab-grown human food tissues,’ and ‘medically activated lab-grown foods.’