Matching Items (3)
Filtering by
- All Subjects: Computer Science
Description
With the advent of social media (like Twitter, Facebook etc.,) people are easily sharing their opinions, sentiments and enforcing their ideologies on others like never before. Even people who are otherwise socially inactive would like to share their thoughts on current affairs by tweeting and sharing news feeds with their friends and acquaintances. In this thesis study, we chose Twitter as our main data platform to analyze shifts and movements of 27 political organizations in Indonesia. So far, we have collected over 30 million tweets and 150,000 news articles from RSS feeds of the corresponding organizations for our analysis. For Twitter data extraction, we developed a multi-threaded application which seamlessly extracts, cleans and stores millions of tweets matching our keywords from Twitter Streaming API. For keyword extraction, we used topics and perspectives which were extracted using n-grams techniques and later approved by our social scientists. After the data is extracted, we aggregate the tweet contents that belong to every user on a weekly basis. Finally, we applied linear and logistic regression using SLEP, an open source sparse learning package to compute weekly score for users and mapping them to one of the 27 organizations on a radical or counter radical scale. Since, we are mapping users to organizations on a weekly basis, we are able to track user's behavior and important new events that triggered shifts among users between organizations. This thesis study can further be extended to identify topics and organization specific influential users and new users from various social media platforms like Facebook, YouTube etc. can easily be mapped to existing organizations on a radical or counter-radical scale.
ContributorsPoornachandran, Sathishkumar (Author) / Davulcu, Hasan (Thesis advisor) / Sen, Arunabha (Committee member) / Woodward, Mark (Committee member) / Arizona State University (Publisher)
Created2013
Description
US Senate is the venue of political debates where the federal bills are formed and voted. Senators show their support/opposition along the bills with their votes. This information makes it possible to extract the polarity of the senators. Similarly, blogosphere plays an increasingly important role as a forum for public debate. Authors display sentiment toward issues, organizations or people using a natural language.
In this research, given a mixed set of senators/blogs debating on a set of political issues from opposing camps, I use signed bipartite graphs for modeling debates, and I propose an algorithm for partitioning both the opinion holders (senators or blogs) and the issues (bills or topics) comprising the debate into binary opposing camps. Simultaneously, my algorithm scales the entities on a univariate scale. Using this scale, a researcher can identify moderate and extreme senators/blogs within each camp, and polarizing versus unifying issues. Through performance evaluations I show that my proposed algorithm provides an effective solution to the problem, and performs much better than existing baseline algorithms adapted to solve this new problem. In my experiments, I used both real data from political blogosphere and US Congress records, as well as synthetic data which were obtained by varying polarization and degree distribution of the vertices of the graph to show the robustness of my algorithm.
I also applied my algorithm on all the terms of the US Senate to the date for longitudinal analysis and developed a web based interactive user interface www.PartisanScale.com to visualize the analysis.
US politics is most often polarized with respect to the left/right alignment of the entities. However, certain issues do not reflect the polarization due to political parties, but observe a split correlating to the demographics of the senators, or simply receive consensus. I propose a hierarchical clustering algorithm that identifies groups of bills that share the same polarization characteristics. I developed a web based interactive user interface www.ControversyAnalysis.com to visualize the clusters while providing a synopsis through distribution charts, word clouds, and heat maps.
In this research, given a mixed set of senators/blogs debating on a set of political issues from opposing camps, I use signed bipartite graphs for modeling debates, and I propose an algorithm for partitioning both the opinion holders (senators or blogs) and the issues (bills or topics) comprising the debate into binary opposing camps. Simultaneously, my algorithm scales the entities on a univariate scale. Using this scale, a researcher can identify moderate and extreme senators/blogs within each camp, and polarizing versus unifying issues. Through performance evaluations I show that my proposed algorithm provides an effective solution to the problem, and performs much better than existing baseline algorithms adapted to solve this new problem. In my experiments, I used both real data from political blogosphere and US Congress records, as well as synthetic data which were obtained by varying polarization and degree distribution of the vertices of the graph to show the robustness of my algorithm.
I also applied my algorithm on all the terms of the US Senate to the date for longitudinal analysis and developed a web based interactive user interface www.PartisanScale.com to visualize the analysis.
US politics is most often polarized with respect to the left/right alignment of the entities. However, certain issues do not reflect the polarization due to political parties, but observe a split correlating to the demographics of the senators, or simply receive consensus. I propose a hierarchical clustering algorithm that identifies groups of bills that share the same polarization characteristics. I developed a web based interactive user interface www.ControversyAnalysis.com to visualize the clusters while providing a synopsis through distribution charts, word clouds, and heat maps.
ContributorsGokalp, Sedat (Author) / Davulcu, Hasan (Thesis advisor) / Sen, Arunabha (Committee member) / Liu, Huan (Committee member) / Woodward, Mark (Committee member) / Arizona State University (Publisher)
Created2015
Description
Internet and social media devices created a new public space for debate on political
and social topics (Papacharissi 2002; Himelboim 2010). Hotly debated issues
span all spheres of human activity; from liberal vs. conservative politics, to radical
vs. counter-radical religious debate, to climate change debate in scientific community,
to globalization debate in economics, and to nuclear disarmament debate in
security. Many prominent ’camps’ have emerged within Internet debate rhetoric and
practice (Dahlberg, n.d.).
In this research I utilized feature extraction and model fitting techniques to process
the rhetoric found in the web sites of 23 Indonesian Islamic religious organizations,
later with 26 similar organizations from the United Kingdom to profile their
ideology and activity patterns along a hypothesized radical/counter-radical scale, and
presented an end-to-end system that is able to help researchers to visualize the data
in an interactive fashion on a time line. The subject data of this study is the articles
downloaded from the web sites of these organizations dating from 2001 to 2011,
and in 2013. I developed algorithms to rank these organizations by assigning them
to probable positions on the scale. I showed that the developed Rasch model fits
the data using Andersen’s LR-test (likelihood ratio). I created a gold standard of
the ranking of these organizations through an expertise elicitation tool. Then using
my system I computed expert-to-expert agreements, and then presented experimental
results comparing the performance of three baseline methods to show that the
Rasch model not only outperforms the baseline methods, but it was also the only
system that performs at expert-level accuracy.
I developed an end-to-end system that receives list of organizations from experts,
mines their web corpus, prepare discourse topic lists with expert support, and then
ranks them on scales with partial expert interaction, and finally presents them on an
easy to use web based analytic system.
and social topics (Papacharissi 2002; Himelboim 2010). Hotly debated issues
span all spheres of human activity; from liberal vs. conservative politics, to radical
vs. counter-radical religious debate, to climate change debate in scientific community,
to globalization debate in economics, and to nuclear disarmament debate in
security. Many prominent ’camps’ have emerged within Internet debate rhetoric and
practice (Dahlberg, n.d.).
In this research I utilized feature extraction and model fitting techniques to process
the rhetoric found in the web sites of 23 Indonesian Islamic religious organizations,
later with 26 similar organizations from the United Kingdom to profile their
ideology and activity patterns along a hypothesized radical/counter-radical scale, and
presented an end-to-end system that is able to help researchers to visualize the data
in an interactive fashion on a time line. The subject data of this study is the articles
downloaded from the web sites of these organizations dating from 2001 to 2011,
and in 2013. I developed algorithms to rank these organizations by assigning them
to probable positions on the scale. I showed that the developed Rasch model fits
the data using Andersen’s LR-test (likelihood ratio). I created a gold standard of
the ranking of these organizations through an expertise elicitation tool. Then using
my system I computed expert-to-expert agreements, and then presented experimental
results comparing the performance of three baseline methods to show that the
Rasch model not only outperforms the baseline methods, but it was also the only
system that performs at expert-level accuracy.
I developed an end-to-end system that receives list of organizations from experts,
mines their web corpus, prepare discourse topic lists with expert support, and then
ranks them on scales with partial expert interaction, and finally presents them on an
easy to use web based analytic system.
ContributorsTikves, Sukru (Author) / Davulcu, Hasan (Thesis advisor) / Sen, Arunabha (Committee member) / Liu, Huan (Committee member) / Woodward, Mark (Committee member) / Arizona State University (Publisher)
Created2016