Matching Items (4)
Filtering by
- Genre: Masters Thesis
Description
Abstract
Everyday living, as an Indigenous person, is an act of resistance. On December 21, 2012, there was a national day of action that included rallies and demonstrations happening all over the world to stand in solidarity with First Nations Indigenous peoples in Canada under the banner Idle No More (INM). The pressure of the movement all came to an end after the cooptation from a few First Nation leadership on January 11, 2013. Despite the failures, the INM movement brought hope, the urgency to act, and ideas of the decolonization and resurgence process. This movement was educational in focus and with that, there is the need to explore essential roles to advance Indigenous resistance to ensure Indigenous liberation. Here I explore the role of the intellectual, and in particular three scholars who provide next level warriorship. Their contributions redirected the conceptualization of decolonization to a process of resurgence. In this manner, authentic Indigenous nationhood is possible.
Everyday living, as an Indigenous person, is an act of resistance. On December 21, 2012, there was a national day of action that included rallies and demonstrations happening all over the world to stand in solidarity with First Nations Indigenous peoples in Canada under the banner Idle No More (INM). The pressure of the movement all came to an end after the cooptation from a few First Nation leadership on January 11, 2013. Despite the failures, the INM movement brought hope, the urgency to act, and ideas of the decolonization and resurgence process. This movement was educational in focus and with that, there is the need to explore essential roles to advance Indigenous resistance to ensure Indigenous liberation. Here I explore the role of the intellectual, and in particular three scholars who provide next level warriorship. Their contributions redirected the conceptualization of decolonization to a process of resurgence. In this manner, authentic Indigenous nationhood is possible.
ContributorsMedina, Laura (Author) / Martinez, David (Thesis advisor) / VIcenti- Carpio, Myla (Committee member) / Riding In, James (Committee member) / Arizona State University (Publisher)
Created2018
Description
In 2005 the Navajo Nation Tribal Council passed the Navajo Sovereignty in Education Act (NSEA). The NSEA has been herald as a decisive new direction in Diné education with implications for Diné language and cultural revitalization. However, research has assumed the NSEA will lead to decolonizing efforts such as language revitalization and has yet to critically analyze how the NSEA is decolonizing or maintains settler colonial educational structures. In order to critically investigate the NSEA this thesis develops a framework of educational elimination through a literature review on the history of United States settler colonial elimination of Indigeneity through schooling and a framework of decolonizing education through a review of literature on promising practices in Indigenous education and culturally responsive schooling. The NSEA is analyzed through the decolonizing education framework and educational elimination framework. I argue the NSEA provides potential leverage for both decolonizing educational practices and the continuation of educational elimination.
ContributorsPreston, Waquin (Author) / Vicenti Carpio, Myla (Thesis advisor) / Sumida Huaman, Elizabeth (Committee member) / Tippeconnic III, John (Committee member) / Arizona State University (Publisher)
Created2015
Description
The Walker River Paiute Tribes land is in question, despite their inherentsovereign right to protect and access to it. The argument posed in this document is that the United States (U.S.). military has two military bases that border the Walker River Paiute Tribe and illegally occupy their unceded lands, trust lands and sacred sites. Their land and sacred sites have been contaminated and destroyed by U.S. military ammunition and ordnance. The U.S. has militarized the Walker River Paiute Tribe in order to push the advancement and training of the U.S military. This thesis uses place-based learning methods to strengthen the connection that the Walker River Paiute Tribe has to the land and recognizes how colonialism, forced removal, and Indian policies have weakened the sovereignty of the Walker River Paiute Tribe. It also examines and spotlights the resistance to every intersectional attempt to destabilize and assimilate the Walker River Paiute Tribe. Case studies, law and order codes, case law and statutes are included in this thesis as foundational pieces to bringing this illegal activity before the Supreme Court. The tribe has an invested interest to these lands because they have occupied and cared for them for thousands of years. The Walker River Paiute Tribe demonstrates self-determination and the practice of sovereignty by remaining in opposition to the illegal activity that has been on- going for over 75 years. Research findings from these studies answer the following questions: How has the U.S. militarization against the Walker River Paiute Tribe affected the sovereignty of the tribe and forced lifeway disruptions? How can connections be drawn between other Indigenous sacred sites and U.S.militarization? And how global militarization can be paralleled to the militarization that has historically happened on American soil. Most importantly, this document produces a timeline of Walker River Paiute Tribe resistance to U.S. militarization since the establishment of each military base.
ContributorsMiller, Crystal (Author) / Martinez, David (Thesis advisor) / Vicenti Carpio, Myla (Committee member) / Fitzgerald, Stephanie (Committee member) / Arizona State University (Publisher)
Created2022
Description
What are possibilities for transforming the structural relationship between Indigenous peoples and settlers? Research conversations among a set of project partners (Indigenous and settler pairs)—who reside in the Phoenix metro area, Arizona or on O’ahu, Hawai’i—addressed what good relationships look like and how to move the structural relationship towards those characteristics. Participants agreed that developing shared understandings is foundational to transforming the structural relationship between Indigenous peoples and settlers; that Indigenous values systems should guide a process of transforming relationships; and that settlers must consider their position in relation to Indigenous peoples because position informs responsibility. The proposed framework for settler responsibility is based on the research design and findings, and addresses structural and individual level transformation. The framework suggests that structural-level settler responsibility entails helping to transform the structural relationship and that the settler role involves a settler transformation process parallel to Indigenous resurgence. On an individual level, personal relationships determine appropriate responsibilities, and the framework includes a suggested process between Indigenous persons and settlers for uncovering what these responsibilities are. The study included a trial of the suggested process, which includes four methods: (1) developing shared understandings of terms/concepts through discussion, (2) gathering stories about who participants are in relationship to each other, (3) examining existing daily practices that gesture to a different structural relationship, and (4) using creative processes to imagine structural relationships in a shared world beyond settler colonialism. These methods explore what possibilities unfold when settlers center their relationship with Indigenous peoples.
ContributorsKong, Lilian (Author) / Lomawaima, K. Tsianina (Thesis advisor) / Swadener, Beth Blue (Committee member) / Quan, H. L. T. (Committee member) / Arizona State University (Publisher)
Created2020