Matching Items (4)
Filtering by

Clear all filters

154065-Thumbnail Image.png
Description
This research explores and deepens our understanding of an element of arts infrastructure in the United States: the arts incubator, an organizational form or programmatic initiative that exists at the intersection of artistic production, entrepreneurship, and public policy. The study is a qualitative cross-case analysis of four arts incubators of

This research explores and deepens our understanding of an element of arts infrastructure in the United States: the arts incubator, an organizational form or programmatic initiative that exists at the intersection of artistic production, entrepreneurship, and public policy. The study is a qualitative cross-case analysis of four arts incubators of different types: Arlington Arts Incubator, Intersection for the Arts, Center for Cultural Innovation, and Mighty Tieton, situated within the context of the literature of arts incubators, business incubator evaluation, and a theoretical framework for understanding entrepreneurship in the US arts and culture sector.

The research opens the black box of incubator operations to find that arts incubators create value for client artists and arts organizations both through direct service provision and indirect echo effects but that the provision of value to communities or systems is attenuated and largely undocumented. Arts incubators, like many small arts organizations, tend to look retrospectively at outputs rather than at the processes that convert inputs to tangible impacts, or means into ends. This is an issue not relegated only to the arts and culture sector; business incubators share some of these tendencies. Despite these issues, arts incubators remain a potentially impactful tool of cultural policy if their processes and activities align with their strategic goals and those processes and activities are assessed formatively and summatively.
ContributorsEssig, Linda (Author) / Schugurensky, Daniel, 1958- (Thesis advisor) / Fahlman, Betsy (Committee member) / Shockley, Gordon (Committee member) / Arizona State University (Publisher)
Created2015
158126-Thumbnail Image.png
Description
Counter-Landscapes: Performative Actions from the 1970s – Now presents a group of artists working in both natural and urban environments whose work exploits the power of place to address issues of social, environmental, and personal transformation. Through a focused selection of key works made between 1970 and 2019, which extend

Counter-Landscapes: Performative Actions from the 1970s – Now presents a group of artists working in both natural and urban environments whose work exploits the power of place to address issues of social, environmental, and personal transformation. Through a focused selection of key works made between 1970 and 2019, which extend beyond traditional categories, Counter-Landscapes illuminates how the methodologies created by women artists in the 1970s and 1980s are employed by artists today, both men and women alike. Developing a practice of performative actions, these artists countered the culture that surrounded and oppressed them by embodying the live elements of performance art in order to push for social change. Looking back to the 1960s and the counter-culture mindset of the times, I approach the histories of land, performance, and conceptual art through feminist studies. Then I apply the same feminist approach to philosophical histories of landscape, place, and space. Through a discussion of an extensive range of works by 25 artists, this research seeks to demonstrate the indelible influence of feminist art practice on contemporary art. It brings the work of an innovative generation of women artists—Marina Abramović, Eleanor Antin, Agnes Denes, VALIE EXPORT, Rebecca Horn, Leslie Labowitz, Suzanne Lacy, Ana Mendieta, Adrian Piper, Lotty Rosenfeld, Bonnie Ora Sherk, Beth Ames Swartz, and Mierle Laderman Ukeles—together with more recent work by artists who have adopted and extended their methods. These artists, both male and female, include Allora  &  Calzadilla, Francis  Alÿs, Angela Ellsworth, Ana Teresa Fernández, Maria  Hupfield, Saskia  Jordá, Christian Philipp Müller, Pope.L,  Sarah Cameron Sunde, Zhou Tao, and Antonia Wright.
ContributorsMcCabe, Jennifer (Author) / Fahlman, Betsy (Thesis advisor) / Hoy, Meredith (Committee member) / Asmall Willsdon, Dominic (Committee member) / Arizona State University (Publisher)
Created2020
161722-Thumbnail Image.png
Description
Cuerpos de Fuerza y Resistencia: Dismantling the U.S. – Mexico Border in the Work of Ana Teresa Fernández and Margarita Cabrera addresses how their artwork maps a geography of resistance that counters the carceral landscape of the U.S. – Mexico border. I apply Michel Foucault’s (1926 – 1984) methodologies of

Cuerpos de Fuerza y Resistencia: Dismantling the U.S. – Mexico Border in the Work of Ana Teresa Fernández and Margarita Cabrera addresses how their artwork maps a geography of resistance that counters the carceral landscape of the U.S. – Mexico border. I apply Michel Foucault’s (1926 – 1984) methodologies of the panopticon to the border as a lens to analyze how Fernández and Cabrera dismantle this structure of power through centering their work on the invisible labor of immigrant women. Foucault’s assertions of disciplinary spaces compare to the unethical conditions in migrant detention centers and maquiladoras. Giorgio Agamben’s (b.1942) study of the concentration camp and theory of bare life also provides a point of comparison between these spaces and harmful treatment of immigrants that Fernández and Cabrera criticize. Through a focused selection of Fernández’s performances and subsequent documentary paintings from her Pressing Matters, Borrando La Frontera, Entre and Of Bodies and Borders series, I analyze how her repetitive and metaphoric acts of labor communicate liberation and autonomy. In a similar vein, I focus on Cabrera’s collaborative embroidery workshops and resultant Space in Between sculptures of Indigenous plants of the Southwest, her vinyl sculptures of domestic appliances, and collaged works on paper from El Flujo de Extracciones. Like Fernández, Cabrera’s aesthetics of labor reveal the disciplinary and abusive institutions of the border, such as the maquiladora, and thus deconstruct these isolating power structures. In considering Gloria E. Anzaldúa’s (1942-2004) borderlands theory, Fernández and Cabrera’s work exemplifies a cultural duality that is integral to disrupting immigrant oppression. I further engage with writer and activist Grace Chang’s gendered analysis on immigration as a framework to address the feminist social justice issues that Fernández and Cabrera explore in their work. Fernández and Cabrera exemplify how centering immigrant women will not only aid in the destruction of xenophobic systems, but also empower stories about women, and invoke a continuous resistance against patriarchal traditions.
ContributorsEnriquez, Ariana (Author) / Fahlman, Betsy (Thesis advisor) / Afanador-Pujol, Angélica J (Committee member) / Hoy, Meredith (Committee member) / Arizona State University (Publisher)
Created2021
131344-Thumbnail Image.png
Description
Shifting gender roles and deviations from societal norms are exemplified in portraits created by queer women artists active during the early twentieth century. A transformative period for women, the beginning of the twentieth century brought the concept of the New Woman to the fore and provided opportunities for independence and

Shifting gender roles and deviations from societal norms are exemplified in portraits created by queer women artists active during the early twentieth century. A transformative period for women, the beginning of the twentieth century brought the concept of the New Woman to the fore and provided opportunities for independence and self-expression for women. The New Woman is a term from the late nineteenth century, referring to women who were less interested in marriage and raising families and more interested in access to jobs and education. Through self-portraits and portraits of women in their circles, artists represented gender expression including androgyny and performative cross-dressing as declarations of queer women’s identity. This thesis focuses on works by the painters Romaine Brooks, Gluck, Florine Stettheimer, and photographers Berenice Abbott, Alice Austen, Marie Høeg and Bolette Berg. The artists socialized in queer circles and fostered new styles and forms of gender representation. In my study I explore how each artist approached her portraits, what each was trying to convey, and how their work aligns or diverges from the queer New Woman ideal. Their identities and shared experiences, both as queer women and artists, shaped their practice.
In addition, the artists’ sexualities are reflected in their pieces through their representation of their bodies. Often, this requires the interpretation of subtle visual clues and crucial images of androgyny, cross-dressing, and the dandy aesthetic. Queer artists often embraced clothing and accessories to express their identity and signal to others adept at recognizing such identifiers that they are queer. The painter Gluck exemplifies how androgynous clothing can be used as a statement of her sexuality in self-portraits as visual signifiers to those in queer circles. Through salons held in their homes, or a hidden back room of their studio in the case of Marie Høeg and Bolette Berg, artists created communities to inspire each other’s achievements and unique styles. In this paper I intend to shed light on how the portraits I am explicating are declarations of queerness, and how they present the artists’ deviations from gender norms to the art world and broader society.
ContributorsAnderson, Ruby (Author) / Fahlman, Betsy (Thesis director) / Codell, Julie (Committee member) / School of Art (Contributor) / School of Social Transformation (Contributor) / Barrett, The Honors College (Contributor)
Created2020-05