Matching Items (7)
Filtering by

Clear all filters

151653-Thumbnail Image.png
Description
Answer Set Programming (ASP) is one of the most prominent and successful knowledge representation paradigms. The success of ASP is due to its expressive non-monotonic modeling language and its efficient computational methods originating from building propositional satisfiability solvers. The wide adoption of ASP has motivated several extensions to its modeling

Answer Set Programming (ASP) is one of the most prominent and successful knowledge representation paradigms. The success of ASP is due to its expressive non-monotonic modeling language and its efficient computational methods originating from building propositional satisfiability solvers. The wide adoption of ASP has motivated several extensions to its modeling language in order to enhance expressivity, such as incorporating aggregates and interfaces with ontologies. Also, in order to overcome the grounding bottleneck of computation in ASP, there are increasing interests in integrating ASP with other computing paradigms, such as Constraint Programming (CP) and Satisfiability Modulo Theories (SMT). Due to the non-monotonic nature of the ASP semantics, such enhancements turned out to be non-trivial and the existing extensions are not fully satisfactory. We observe that one main reason for the difficulties rooted in the propositional semantics of ASP, which is limited in handling first-order constructs (such as aggregates and ontologies) and functions (such as constraint variables in CP and SMT) in natural ways. This dissertation presents a unifying view on these extensions by viewing them as instances of formulas with generalized quantifiers and intensional functions. We extend the first-order stable model semantics by by Ferraris, Lee, and Lifschitz to allow generalized quantifiers, which cover aggregate, DL-atoms, constraints and SMT theory atoms as special cases. Using this unifying framework, we study and relate different extensions of ASP. We also present a tight integration of ASP with SMT, based on which we enhance action language C+ to handle reasoning about continuous changes. Our framework yields a systematic approach to study and extend non-monotonic languages.
ContributorsMeng, Yunsong (Author) / Lee, Joohyung (Thesis advisor) / Ahn, Gail-Joon (Committee member) / Baral, Chitta (Committee member) / Fainekos, Georgios (Committee member) / Lifschitz, Vladimir (Committee member) / Arizona State University (Publisher)
Created2013
153374-Thumbnail Image.png
Description
Users often join an online social networking (OSN) site, like Facebook, to remain social, by either staying connected with friends or expanding social networks. On an OSN site, users generally share variety of personal information which is often expected to be visible to their friends, but sometimes vulnerable to

Users often join an online social networking (OSN) site, like Facebook, to remain social, by either staying connected with friends or expanding social networks. On an OSN site, users generally share variety of personal information which is often expected to be visible to their friends, but sometimes vulnerable to unwarranted access from others. The recent study suggests that many personal attributes, including religious and political affiliations, sexual orientation, relationship status, age, and gender, are predictable using users' personal data from an OSN site. The majority of users want to remain socially active, and protect their personal data at the same time. This tension leads to a user's vulnerability, allowing privacy attacks which can cause physical and emotional distress to a user, sometimes with dire consequences. For example, stalkers can make use of personal information available on an OSN site to their personal gain. This dissertation aims to systematically study a user vulnerability against such privacy attacks.

A user vulnerability can be managed in three steps: (1) identifying, (2) measuring and (3) reducing a user vulnerability. Researchers have long been identifying vulnerabilities arising from user's personal data, including user names, demographic attributes, lists of friends, wall posts and associated interactions, multimedia data such as photos, audios and videos, and tagging of friends. Hence, this research first proposes a way to measure and reduce a user vulnerability to protect such personal data. This dissertation also proposes an algorithm to minimize a user's vulnerability while maximizing their social utility values.

To address these vulnerability concerns, social networking sites like Facebook usually let their users to adjust their profile settings so as to make some of their data invisible. However, users sometimes interact with others using unprotected posts (e.g., posts from a ``Facebook page\footnote{The term ''Facebook page`` refers to the page which are commonly dedicated for businesses, brands and organizations to share their stories and connect with people.}''). Such interactions help users to become more social and are publicly accessible to everyone. Thus, visibilities of these interactions are beyond the control of their profile settings. I explore such unprotected interactions so that users' are well aware of these new vulnerabilities and adopt measures to mitigate them further. In particular, {\em are users' personal attributes predictable using only the unprotected interactions}? To answer this question, I address a novel problem of predictability of users' personal attributes with unprotected interactions. The extreme sparsity patterns in users' unprotected interactions pose a serious challenge. Therefore, I approach to mitigating the data sparsity challenge by designing a novel attribute prediction framework using only the unprotected interactions. Experimental results on Facebook dataset demonstrates that the proposed framework can predict users' personal attributes.
ContributorsGundecha, Pritam S (Author) / Liu, Huan (Thesis advisor) / Ahn, Gail-Joon (Committee member) / Ye, Jieping (Committee member) / Barbier, Geoffrey (Committee member) / Arizona State University (Publisher)
Created2015
150534-Thumbnail Image.png
Description
Different logic-based knowledge representation formalisms have different limitations either with respect to expressivity or with respect to computational efficiency. First-order logic, which is the basis of Description Logics (DLs), is not suitable for defeasible reasoning due to its monotonic nature. The nonmonotonic formalisms that extend first-order logic, such as circumscription

Different logic-based knowledge representation formalisms have different limitations either with respect to expressivity or with respect to computational efficiency. First-order logic, which is the basis of Description Logics (DLs), is not suitable for defeasible reasoning due to its monotonic nature. The nonmonotonic formalisms that extend first-order logic, such as circumscription and default logic, are expressive but lack efficient implementations. The nonmonotonic formalisms that are based on the declarative logic programming approach, such as Answer Set Programming (ASP), have efficient implementations but are not expressive enough for representing and reasoning with open domains. This dissertation uses the first-order stable model semantics, which extends both first-order logic and ASP, to relate circumscription to ASP, and to integrate DLs and ASP, thereby partially overcoming the limitations of the formalisms. By exploiting the relationship between circumscription and ASP, well-known action formalisms, such as the situation calculus, the event calculus, and Temporal Action Logics, are reformulated in ASP. The advantages of these reformulations are shown with respect to the generality of the reasoning tasks that can be handled and with respect to the computational efficiency. The integration of DLs and ASP presented in this dissertation provides a framework for integrating rules and ontologies for the semantic web. This framework enables us to perform nonmonotonic reasoning with DL knowledge bases. Observing the need to integrate action theories and ontologies, the above results are used to reformulate the problem of integrating action theories and ontologies as a problem of integrating rules and ontologies, thus enabling us to use the computational tools developed in the context of the latter for the former.
ContributorsPalla, Ravi (Author) / Lee, Joohyung (Thesis advisor) / Baral, Chitta (Committee member) / Kambhampati, Subbarao (Committee member) / Lifschitz, Vladimir (Committee member) / Arizona State University (Publisher)
Created2012
156622-Thumbnail Image.png
Description
Reasoning about the activities of cyber threat actors is critical to defend against cyber

attacks. However, this task is difficult for a variety of reasons. In simple terms, it is difficult

to determine who the attacker is, what the desired goals are of the attacker, and how they will

carry out their attacks.

Reasoning about the activities of cyber threat actors is critical to defend against cyber

attacks. However, this task is difficult for a variety of reasons. In simple terms, it is difficult

to determine who the attacker is, what the desired goals are of the attacker, and how they will

carry out their attacks. These three questions essentially entail understanding the attacker’s

use of deception, the capabilities available, and the intent of launching the attack. These

three issues are highly inter-related. If an adversary can hide their intent, they can better

deceive a defender. If an adversary’s capabilities are not well understood, then determining

what their goals are becomes difficult as the defender is uncertain if they have the necessary

tools to accomplish them. However, the understanding of these aspects are also mutually

supportive. If we have a clear picture of capabilities, intent can better be deciphered. If we

understand intent and capabilities, a defender may be able to see through deception schemes.

In this dissertation, I present three pieces of work to tackle these questions to obtain

a better understanding of cyber threats. First, we introduce a new reasoning framework

to address deception. We evaluate the framework by building a dataset from DEFCON

capture-the-flag exercise to identify the person or group responsible for a cyber attack.

We demonstrate that the framework not only handles cases of deception but also provides

transparent decision making in identifying the threat actor. The second task uses a cognitive

learning model to determine the intent – goals of the threat actor on the target system.

The third task looks at understanding the capabilities of threat actors to target systems by

identifying at-risk systems from hacker discussions on darkweb websites. To achieve this

task we gather discussions from more than 300 darkweb websites relating to malicious

hacking.
ContributorsNunes, Eric (Author) / Shakarian, Paulo (Thesis advisor) / Ahn, Gail-Joon (Committee member) / Baral, Chitta (Committee member) / Cooke, Nancy J. (Committee member) / Arizona State University (Publisher)
Created2018
156799-Thumbnail Image.png
Description
Cyber-systems and networks are the target of different types of cyber-threats and attacks, which are becoming more common, sophisticated, and damaging. Those attacks can vary in the way they are performed. However, there are similar strategies

and tactics often used because they are time-proven to be effective. The motivations behind cyber-attacks

Cyber-systems and networks are the target of different types of cyber-threats and attacks, which are becoming more common, sophisticated, and damaging. Those attacks can vary in the way they are performed. However, there are similar strategies

and tactics often used because they are time-proven to be effective. The motivations behind cyber-attacks play an important role in designating how attackers plan and proceed to achieve their goals. Generally, there are three categories of motivation

are: political, economical, and socio-cultural motivations. These indicate that to defend against possible attacks in an enterprise environment, it is necessary to consider what makes such an enterprise environment a target. That said, we can understand

what threats to consider and how to deploy the right defense system. In other words, detecting an attack depends on the defenders having a clear understanding of why they become targets and what possible attacks they should expect. For instance,

attackers may preform Denial of Service (DoS), or even worse Distributed Denial of Service (DDoS), with intention to cause damage to targeted organizations and prevent legitimate users from accessing their services. However, in some cases, attackers are very skilled and try to hide in a system undetected for a long period of time with the incentive to steal and collect data rather than causing damages.

Nowadays, not only the variety of attack types and the way they are launched are important. However, advancement in technology is another factor to consider. Over the last decades, we have experienced various new technologies. Obviously, in the beginning, new technologies will have their own limitations before they stand out. There are a number of related technical areas whose understanding is still less than satisfactory, and in which long-term research is needed. On the other hand, these new technologies can boost the advancement of deploying security solutions and countermeasures when they are carefully adapted. That said, Software Defined Networking i(SDN), its related security threats and solutions, and its adaption in enterprise environments bring us new chances to enhance our security solutions. To reach the optimal level of deploying SDN technology in enterprise environments, it is important to consider re-evaluating current deployed security solutions in traditional networks before deploying them to SDN-based infrastructures. Although DDoS attacks are a bit sinister, there are other types of cyber-threats that are very harmful, sophisticated, and intelligent. Thus, current security defense solutions to detect DDoS cannot detect them. These kinds of attacks are complex, persistent, and stealthy, also referred to Advanced Persistent Threats (APTs) which often leverage the bot control and remotely access valuable information. APT uses multiple stages to break into a network. APT is a sort of unseen, continuous and long-term penetrative network and attackers can bypass the existing security detection systems. It can modify and steal the sensitive data as well as specifically cause physical damage the target system. In this dissertation, two cyber-attack motivations are considered: sabotage, where the motive is the destruction; and information theft, where attackers aim to acquire invaluable information (customer info, business information, etc). I deal with two types of attacks (DDoS attacks and APT attacks) where DDoS attacks are classified under sabotage motivation category, and the APT attacks are classified under information theft motivation category. To detect and mitigate each of these attacks, I utilize the ease of programmability in SDN and its great platform for implementation, dynamic topology changes, decentralized network management, and ease of deploying security countermeasures.
ContributorsAlshamrani, Adel (Author) / Huang, Dijiang (Thesis advisor) / Doupe, Adam (Committee member) / Ahn, Gail-Joon (Committee member) / Davulcu, Hasan (Committee member) / Arizona State University (Publisher)
Created2018
155079-Thumbnail Image.png
Description
Passwords are ubiquitous and are poised to stay that way due to their relative usability, security and deployability when compared with alternative authentication schemes. Unfortunately, humans struggle with some of the assumptions or requirements that are necessary for truly strong passwords. As administrators try to push users towards password complexity

Passwords are ubiquitous and are poised to stay that way due to their relative usability, security and deployability when compared with alternative authentication schemes. Unfortunately, humans struggle with some of the assumptions or requirements that are necessary for truly strong passwords. As administrators try to push users towards password complexity and diversity, users still end up using predictable mangling patterns on old passwords and reusing the same passwords across services; users even inadvertently converge on the same patterns to a surprising degree, making an attacker’s job easier. This work explores using machine learning techniques to pick out strong passwords from weak ones, from a dataset of 10 million passwords, based on how structurally similar they were to the rest of the set.
ContributorsTodd, Margaret Nicole (Author) / Xue, Guoliang (Thesis advisor) / Ahn, Gail-Joon (Committee member) / Huang, Dijiang (Committee member) / Arizona State University (Publisher)
Created2016
155561-Thumbnail Image.png
Description
Field of cyber threats is evolving rapidly and every day multitude of new information about malware and Advanced Persistent Threats (APTs) is generated in the form of malware reports, blog articles, forum posts, etc. However, current Threat Intelligence (TI) systems have several limitations. First, most of the TI systems examine

Field of cyber threats is evolving rapidly and every day multitude of new information about malware and Advanced Persistent Threats (APTs) is generated in the form of malware reports, blog articles, forum posts, etc. However, current Threat Intelligence (TI) systems have several limitations. First, most of the TI systems examine and interpret data manually with the help of analysts. Second, some of them generate Indicators of Compromise (IOCs) directly using regular expressions without understanding the contextual meaning of those IOCs from the data sources which allows the tools to include lot of false positives. Third, lot of TI systems consider either one or two data sources for the generation of IOCs, and misses some of the most valuable IOCs from other data sources.

To overcome these limitations, we propose iGen, a novel approach to fully automate the process of IOC generation and analysis. Proposed approach is based on the idea that our model can understand English texts like human beings, and extract the IOCs from the different data sources intelligently. Identification of the IOCs is done on the basis of the syntax and semantics of the sentence as well as context words (e.g., ``attacked'', ``suspicious'') present in the sentence which helps the approach work on any kind of data source. Our proposed technique, first removes the words with no contextual meaning like stop words and punctuations etc. Then using the rest of the words in the sentence and output label (IOC or non-IOC sentence), our model intelligently learn to classify sentences into IOC and non-IOC sentences. Once IOC sentences are identified using this learned Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) based approach, next step is to identify the IOC tokens (like domains, IP, URL) in the sentences. This CNN based classification model helps in removing false positives (like IPs which are not malicious). Afterwards, IOCs extracted from different data sources are correlated to find the links between thousands of apparently unrelated attack instances, particularly infrastructures shared between them. Our approach fully automates the process of IOC generation from gathering data from different sources to creating rules (e.g. OpenIOC, snort rules, STIX rules) for deployment on

the security infrastructure.

iGen has collected around 400K IOCs till now with a precision of 95\%, better than any state-of-art method.
ContributorsPanwar, Anupam (Author) / Ahn, Gail-Joon (Thesis advisor) / Doupe, Adam (Committee member) / Zhao, Ziming (Committee member) / Arizona State University (Publisher)
Created2017