Matching Items (5)
Filtering by
- All Subjects: Accounting
- All Subjects: Global Settlement
- All Subjects: Individual investors
- All Subjects: Investment analysis--Law and legislation--United States--History--21st century.
- All Subjects: Investment Banking
- Creators: Lamoreaux, Phillip
- Member of: ASU Electronic Theses and Dissertations
Description
Responding to the allegedly biased research reports issued by large investment banks, the Global Research Analyst Settlement and related regulations went to great lengths to weaken the conflicts of interest faced by investment bank analysts. In this paper, I investigate the effects of these changes on small and large investor confidence and on trading profitability. Specifically, I examine abnormal trading volumes generated by small and large investors in response to security analyst recommendations and the resulting abnormal market returns generated. I find an overall increase in investor confidence in the post-regulation period relative to the pre-regulation period consistent with a reduction in existing conflicts of interest. The change in confidence observed is particularly striking for small traders. I also find that small trader profitability has increased in the post-regulation period relative to the pre-regulation period whereas that for large traders has decreased. These results are consistent with the Securities and Exchange Commission's primary mission to protect small investors and maintain the integrity of the securities markets.
ContributorsDong, Xiaobo (Author) / Mikhail, Michael (Thesis advisor) / Hwang, Yuhchang (Committee member) / Hugon, Artur J (Committee member) / Arizona State University (Publisher)
Created2011
Description
A Chief Audit Executive (CAE) is the leader of a company’s internal audit function. Because there is no mandated disclosure requirement for the internal audit structure, little is understood about the influence of a CAE on a company. Following the logic that a CAE disclosed in SEC filings is more influential in a company’s oversight function, I identify an influential CAE using the disclosure of the role. I then examine the association between an influential CAE and monitoring outcomes. Using data hand collected from SEC filings for S&P 1500 companies from 2004 to 2015, I find companies that have an influential CAE are generally larger, older, and have a larger corporate board. More importantly, I find that an influential CAE in NYSE-listed companies is associated with higher internal control quality. This association is stronger for companies that reference a CAE’s direct interaction with the audit committee. This study provides an initial investigation into a common, but little understood position in corporate oversight.
ContributorsZhang, Wei (Author) / Lamoreaux, Phillip (Thesis advisor) / Kaplan, Steve (Committee member) / Li, Yinghua (Committee member) / Arizona State University (Publisher)
Created2019
Description
An audit increases the credibility of financial reports by reducing the uncertainty in financial information. A change of auditor will prompt investors to reevaluate this uncertainty. I examine the association between auditor changes and the pricing of information risk using the Fama-French asset pricing model augmented with accounting- based information risk factors. On average, I find that the pricing of information risk decreases after an auditor change, suggesting that investors are less concerned about information risk after an auditor change. However, for auditor changes that involve auditor resignations, disagreements, and movements away from a Big 4 auditor, I find an increase in the pricing of information risk, implying that these changes are associated with a weakened information environment. I also show that market returns surrounding the change announcement are correlated with the future change in perceived information risk. My study contributes to the debate surrounding mandatory auditor rotation and auditor tenure by suggesting that not all auditor changes are perceived the same way by investors.
ContributorsMyers, Noah (Author) / Lamoreaux, Phillip (Thesis advisor) / Kaplan, Steven (Thesis advisor) / Baugh, Matthew (Committee member) / Arizona State University (Publisher)
Created2021
Description
In 2016, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) imposed on managers a responsibility to evaluate their companies’ forward-looking prospects for continuing as a going concern on a quarterly basis. Prior to this change, the responsibility of assessing the future of a company was only required annually by the external auditor through auditing standards. If this increase in management responsibility induced managers to implement a process and controls to obtain forward-looking information for disclosure, I would expect this information acquisition process to also improve overall financial reporting quality. I find that financial reporting quality increased for firms after Accounting Standards Update (ASU) 2014-15, as evidenced by less restatements. Additionally, while I find the timeliness of information decreased, as evidenced by slower earnings announcements, the decrease is not economically meaningful. Lastly, I find the effect of the standard change on financial reporting quality is greater for non-financially healthy companies who have to perform a more extensive analysis under ASU 2014-15. While the purpose of the accounting standard was to reduce diversity in the timing and content of going concern disclosures, I find evidence of other benefits with little costs that this standard had on firm’s financial reporting.
ContributorsMatkaluk, Lauren (Author) / Lamoreaux, Phillip (Thesis advisor) / Kaplan, Steve (Committee member) / Call, Andy (Committee member) / Arizona State University (Publisher)
Created2023
Description
This study examines the effect of outside wealth on executives’ risk-taking in financial reporting. To investigate this question, I hand-collect data on Chief Financial Officers’ (CFO) real estate assets and use housing returns as a proxy for CFOs’ outside wealth changes. I find that CFOs who experience a large negative housing return become less aggressive in financial reporting, as evidenced by a lower likelihood of restatement. Additional tests show that this effect is driven by CFOs who have less diversified wealth portfolios, by younger CFOs, and by CFOs with more leveraged houses, suggesting that the reduced risk-taking behavior of CFOs stems from decreased diversification of personal wealth and increased career concerns after a negative shock to outside wealth. These findings highlight the important role of executive outside wealth in explaining their risk-taking behaviors.
ContributorsLiu, Summer Z. (Author) / Huang, Shawn (Thesis advisor) / Lamoreaux, Phillip (Thesis advisor) / Hugon, Artur (Committee member) / Li, Yinghua (Committee member) / Arizona State University (Publisher)
Created2023