Matching Items (1)
Filtering by

Clear all filters

632-Thumbnail Image.png
Description
Background and Aims: The aim of this research was to assess whether clients receiving treatment for substance abuse in a residential treatment facility will achieve lower rates of relapse with treatment in combination with active sponsorship. Prior studies suggest sponsorship may equally be impactful as attending 12-step meetings.

Design: The

Background and Aims: The aim of this research was to assess whether clients receiving treatment for substance abuse in a residential treatment facility will achieve lower rates of relapse with treatment in combination with active sponsorship. Prior studies suggest sponsorship may equally be impactful as attending 12-step meetings.

Design: The primary hypothesis was that active participation as defined by contact with a sponsor of an hour or more per week, as measured by the impact on affective characteristics correlated with increased levels of sobriety, when measured by the AWARE questionnaire (Advance Warning of Relapse) within 7 days of entry and prior to discharge (within 30 days). Setting: The project took place in a residential treatment facility in Phoenix, Arizona.

Participants: There were 12 clients from a men’s house and 12 clients from a woman’s house, all of which were going through recovery. Intervention: The educational session explained what a sponsor is and the importance of finding one early as a key role in relapse prevention.

Measurements: Pre and post-test results were compared to see if there was an impact on the predictability of relapse and sponsorship. The paired t-test was performed to compare the two means of AWARE scores. A lower score on the AWARE questionnaire indicates a person is more likely to succeed in sobriety.

Findings: Based on 24 samples collected, the mean scores within the first seven days were 91.17 with a standard deviation of 18.59 and the mean score prior to discharge were 72.78 with a standard deviation (SD) of 20.02. The mean difference between the two scores was 18.39 (SD=2.84). There was a significant effect of the relapse prevention program which included sponsorship, t (22) = 4.79, p < 0.001.

Conclusion: Implications for practice include increased time with sponsors to reduce rates of relapse. Future concerns include good fit matching which may reduce rates of relapse even further.
ContributorsMoore, Christa (Author) / Guthrey, Ann (Thesis advisor)
Created2018-04-21