This brief article, written for a symposium on "Collaboration and the Colorado River," evaluates the U.S. Department of the Interior's Glen Canyon Dam Adaptive Management Program ("AMP"). The AMP has been advanced as a pioneering collaborative and adaptive approach for both decreasing scientific uncertainty in support of regulatory decision-making and helping manage contentious resource disputes -- in this case, the increasingly thorny conflict over the Colorado River's finite natural resources. Though encouraging in some respects, the AMP serves as a valuable illustration of the flaws of existing regulatory processes purporting to incorporate collaboration and regulatory adaptation into the decision-making process. Born in the shadow of the law and improvised with too little thought as to its structure, the AMP demonstrates the need to attend to the design of the regulatory process and integrate mechanisms that compel systematic program evaluation and adaptation. As such, the AMP provides vital information on how future collaborative experiments might be modified to enhance their prospects of success.

The Glen Canyon Dam Adaptive Management Program (AMP) has been identified as a model for natural resource management. We challenge that assertion, citing the lack of progress toward a long-term management plan for the dam, sustained extra-programmatic conflict, and a downriver ecology that is still in jeopardy, despite over ten years of meetings and an expensive research program. We have examined the primary and secondary sources available on the AMP’s design and operation in light of best practices identified in the literature on adaptive management and collaborative decision-making. We have identified six shortcomings: (1) an inadequate approach to identifying stakeholders; (2) a failure to provide clear goals and involve stakeholders in establishing the operating procedures that guide the collaborative process; (3) inappropriate use of professional neutrals and a failure to cultivate consensus; (4) a failure to establish and follow clear joint fact-finding procedures; (5) a failure to produce functional written agreements; and (6) a failure to manage the AMP adaptively and cultivate long-term problem-solving capacity.

Adaptive management can be an effective approach for addressing complex ecosystem-related processes like the operation of the Glen Canyon Dam, particularly in the face of substantial complexity, uncertainty, and political contentiousness. However, the Glen Canyon Dam AMP shows that a stated commitment to collaboration and adaptive management is insufficient. Effective management of natural resources can only be realized through careful attention to the collaborative design and implementation of appropriate problem-solving and adaptive-management procedures. It also requires the development of an appropriate organizational infrastructure that promotes stakeholder dialogue and agency learning. Though the experimental Glen Canyon Dam AMP is far from a success of collaborative adaptive management, the lessons from its shortcomings can foster more effective collaborative adaptive management in the future by Congress, federal agencies, and local and state authorities.

Objectives: To provide novel quantification and advanced measurements of surface temperatures (Ts) in playgrounds, employing multiple scales of data, and provide insight into hot-hazard mitigation techniques and designs for improved environmental and public health.

Methods: We conduct an analysis of Ts in two Metro-Phoenix playgrounds at three scales: neighborhood (1 km resolution), microscale (6.8 m resolution), and touch-scale (1 cm resolution). Data were derived from two sources: airborne remote sensing (neighborhood and microscale) and in situ (playground site) infrared Ts (touch-scale). Metrics of surface-to-air temperature deltas (Ts–a) and scale offsets (errors) are introduced.

Results: Select in situ Ts in direct sunlight are shown to approach or surpass values likely to result in burns to children at touch-scales much finer than Ts resolved by airborne remote sensing. Scale offsets based on neighbourhood and microscale ground observations are 3.8 ◦C and 7.3 ◦C less than the Ts–a at the 1 cm touch-scale, respectively, and 6.6 ◦C and 10.1 ◦C lower than touch-scale playground equipment Ts, respectively. Hence, the coarser scales underestimate high Ts within playgrounds. Both natural (tree) and artificial (shade sail) shade types are associated with significant reductions in Ts.

Conclusions: A scale mismatch exists based on differing methods of urban Ts measurement. The sub-meter touch-scale is the spatial scale at which data must be collected and policies of urban landscape design and health must be executed in order to mitigate high Ts in high-contact environments such as playgrounds. Shade implementation is the most promising mitigation technique to reduce child burns, increase park usability, and mitigate urban heating.

Children with congenital heart disease (CHD) are at increased risk for psychosocial issues (PSI), decreased quality of life (QOL), and decreased resilience. The purpose of this project was to implement a screening protocol for PSI, QOL, and resilience, with appropriate psychosocial referral for children with CHD.

A pilot protocol was implemented to screen children with CHD, aged 8-17 years, and parents, for resilience, QOL, and PSI. Referrals for psychosocial services were made for 84.2% of children screened (n = 16) based on scoring outcomes. Statistically significant differences in the parents and children’s resilience mean scores were noted. Higher parental scores may indicate that parents believe their children are more resilient than the children perceive themselves to be.
Early identification of concerns regarding QOL, resilience, and PSI in children with CHD can provide ongoing surveillance, while affording opportunities for improved communication between providers, parents, and children. Routine screening and longitudinal follow-up is recommended.

Diabetes mellitus (DM) is a detrimental disease that afflicts approximately 23.6 million Americans and costs $176 billion dollars annually in direct medical expenses (American Diabetes Association [ADA], 2015). Approximately 208,000 children and adolescents with diabetes are under the age of 20 years (ADA, 105; CDC, 2014). Currently, the standard of medical practice in school-aged children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes is to administer insulin after the child or teen has eaten. The most current evidence has demonstrated a decrease hemoglobin A1C (HbA1c) and preference for pre-prandial insulin administration (Cobry et al., 2010; Danne et al., 2003; DePalma et al., 2011; Enander et al., 2012; Luijf et al., 2010; Scaramuzza et al., 2010).

This Doctor of Nursing Practice (DNP) project delivered an educational program for parents of school age children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes and instituted pre-prandial insulin administration as the standard of care in an outpatient pediatric endocrine clinic. Education was delivered in both verbal and written formats. Data collection included weekly blood glucose reports and HbA1c at initial and follow-up sessions. Descriptive statistics were utilized to analyze the data. No post intervention data was able to be collected due to participant drop out. Future directions to promote this practice change are discussed.

Approximately 15,270 children were diagnosed with cancer last year and a common treatment includes daily radiation therapy. Children must remain immobilized for the planning and treatment to ensure the radiation beam precisely delivers radiation to the tumor and reduces exposure to the normal surrounding tissue. Radiation therapy may last several weeks, which requires children to be put under daily anesthesia for an extended length of time to ensure immobilization. The risks for anesthesia include airway obstruction, broncho/laryngospasm, oxygen desaturation, apnea, nausea/vomiting, hypothermia, hypotension, hypoxia, cardiac arrest, sepsis due to central line access, and death. The relationship between daily anesthesia administration and neurotoxicity is currently unclear.

The purpose of audiovisual distraction (AVD) during radiation therapy was to decrease anesthesia exposure, improve quality of life, and decrease anxiety of patients and families. A plan to implement an AVD device at the time of radiation planning and during daily treatments was conducted in a large pediatric radiation oncology practice in Arizona. Inclusion criteria were children needing radiation, between the ages of 5 and 15, who do not have history or complaint of visual impairment, who have the ability to follow directions for AVD, and were deemed candidates by the Radiation Oncologist and Child Life Specialist through physical and mental assessment. Data collection included anesthesia requirements, heart rate, PedsQL Tool, and time in treatment room gathered at the planning session and at the end of treatment. Microsoft SPSS was used for data analysis. Descriptive statistics were used to describe the sample and outcome variables.

The aggregated data was analyzed to ascertain if the number of children in the inclusion age range had a decreased need for anesthesia, decreased anxiety, and increased quality of life. The primary outcome for the AVD was: all four children who participated were able to undergo radiation therapy without the need for anesthesia . The children were able to remain awake for treatment could attend school, as permissible, eat before treatment, and spend significantly less time at the treatment facility. The concern of repetitive anesthesia and neurotoxicity will not be a factor in the child’s long term late effects of treatment. The reduction of need on anesthesia staff and nursing staff was estimated to save over 500,000 dollars for the 89 treatments the four children underwent with the AVD. The benefits of the intervention not only provided a better treatment experience for all children, but it allowed the facility to utilize the treatment machine more efficiently, providing radiation therapy as an option to even more patients.

Introduction: More than 1.2 million children in military families face long separations from a parent due to deployment or extended assignment, which can lead to significant family dysfunction as well as behavioral, emotional, and scholastic problems for the child. The purpose of From Caring 2 Coping is to identify and provide healthcare providers of military children tools to recognize and address maladaptive and externalizing behaviors of these children, while also assisting the nondeployed parent or caregiver to provide their children with the necessary support to reduce stress and increase their own coping skills.

Materials and Methods: After approval from Arizona State University IRB, children aged 4-11 years who are currently or forecasted to be separated from a military parent due to a deployment or extended assignment, were recruited from a military pediatric clinic along with their primary caregiver. An intervention was adapted from Bowen and Martin’s (2011) Resiliency Model of Role Performance for Service Members, Veterans, and their Families to identify and improve individual assets and family communication skills, find support through social connections, and prepare for potential stressors by constructing a Roadmap of Life. The Parental Stress Scale (PSS) and Pediatric Symptom Checklist (PSC-17) were completed before and after the 4-week intervention along with a final caregiver survey to evaluate the caregiver’s perceptions of From Caring 2 Coping.

Results: Four mothers and eight children completed the program for which Wilcoxon matched-pairs signed-rank test compared results from pre- and post PSC-17 surveys from the children showing significant improvement post-intervention (p = 0.017). The post PSC-17 results were compared to post PSS results with Spearman Correlation Coefficient, r = 0.949, that is statistically significant (p = 0.05). From Caring 2 Coping is rated as an effective program by parents in a postintervention survey that is easy to incorporate into daily activities. Parents ranked highest satisfaction through use of the Family Communication Plan and Family Timeline.

Conclusions: From Caring 2 Coping intervention tools improved family communication, use of individual assets and Roadmap of Life coping skills, thereby improving child and caregiver coping response as evidenced by improved PSC-17 and PSS scores. Basing the intervention on the Resiliency Model of Role Performance which has proven successful in the military population, improves the chances for success in this target population. However, the small sample size of four families requires further study with more families at all levels of the deployment cycle in order to refine the intervention.