Matching Items (4)
Filtering by
- All Subjects: Primary Health Care
- Creators: College of Nursing and Health Innovation
Description
The purpose of the study was to determine the level and type of public policy involvement among registered nurses (RN) who are members of the Arizona Nurses Association (AzNA). Furthermore, the aim of the study was to identify the knowledge base and motivation of nurses and their involvement in public policy as well as the barriers and benefits. A 20- item survey was sent to all of the members of AzNA. There were 39 responses used in the analysis. The highest reported public policy activities in which the nurses had participated were: voted (90%), contacted a public official (51%), and gave money to a campaign or for a public policy concern (46%). Lack of time was the most frequently reported barrier to involvement and improving the health of the public was the most frequently reported benefit to involvement. The number of public policy education/information sources and the highest level of education positively correlate to the nurses' total number of public policy activities (r = .627 p <0.05; r = .504, p <0.05). Based on the results of stepwise linear regression analysis, the participants' age, number of education/information sources, and efficacy expectation predict 68.8% of involvement in public policy activities. The greater the number of education/information sources, the greater the number of public policy activities nurses report having participated in.
ContributorsHartman, Mykaila Corrine (Author) / Stevens, Carol (Thesis director) / Munoz, Aliria (Committee member) / Link, Denise (Committee member) / Arizona State University. College of Nursing & Healthcare Innovation (Contributor) / Barrett, The Honors College (Contributor)
Created2015-12
Description
Background: Obesity is a known comorbidity for chronic disease and is responsible for 47% of related medical costs. Recognizing the complex etiology of obesity, the need for an effective and comprehensive screening tool will assist primary care providers in assessing their patient's needs and facilitating success in managing their weight and health. Primary care providers (PCP) have limited knowledge of current evidence in obesity treatment. The project guides the form of tools to help identify the patients' self-efficacy, change readiness, and insurance reimbursement.
Methods: Expedited IRB approval was obtained, allowing for data analysis from completed de-identified screenings, surveys, and medical records gathered between September 2022 and April 2023. Screenings including Weight Efficacy, Lifestyle long-form (WEL-LF), and Stages Of Change Readiness And Treatment Eagerness Scale In Overweight And Obesity (SOCRATES-OO) were used to assess the effectiveness of the treatment plan. Russwurm and Larrabee's model for evidence-based practice change was chosen for the project's framework. The provider was given a guide for obesity management with tips for billing insurance. A convenience sample of eight patients met with the providers over three months as part of their obesity management treatment plan.
Results: The pre and post-screenings collected from the remaining participants (n=8) showed no statistical differences. However, the satisfaction and feedback survey from patients (n=8), provider (n=1), and office staff (n=4) showed improved quality of care and greater confidence in the provider's part in initiating and managing their patient's chronic obesity.
Conclusion: Improving PCPs' knowledge of Obesity treatment improves patient care. Expanding this project to a larger scale and disseminating the information can impact patients' lives positively.
Keywords: Obesity; self-efficacy; readiness for change; stages of change; primary care, Weight Efficacy Lifestyle questionnaires
ContributorsBrock-Andersen, Marian (Author) / Moffett, Carol (Thesis advisor) / College of Nursing and Health Innovation (Contributor)
Created2023-04-28
Description
Problem Statement: The onset of the COVID-19 pandemic led to intense challenges for health care providers. Outpatient primary care practices rapidly moved from in-person practice to video-conferencing telehealth appointments. This shift requires study, particularly how this has impacted the lived experience of providers.
Purpose: This project aims to explore primary care provider satisfaction with telehealth in the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic.
Methods: A point-in-time survey was administered to primary care providers at a large university health system. Participants were recruited at a monthly provider meeting and invited to complete an anonymous online survey. Satisfaction with video-conferencing patient visits was explored via Likert scale and write-in responses. Providers highlighted specific complaints, problems, and successes that impacted their practice and patients. Aggregate health data from this organization was also obtained for comparison. Statistical analysis was performed and recommendations made for future practice.
Findings: The provider experience of telehealth was overwhelmingly positive. 85% (n=11) of providers agreed or strongly agreed that telehealth allows them to manage their patients effectively. Lack of physical exam findings was the most commonly cited concern (n=9). 100% (n=13) of providers would like to continue seeing patients via telehealth in the future.
Conclusion: Videoconferencing appointments in university health primary care promote high provider satisfaction. Future policies and innovations should support the use of a telehealth platform.
ContributorsMcKernan, M. Katherine (Author) / Nunez, Diane (Thesis advisor) / College of Nursing and Health Innovation (Contributor)
Created2023-04-29
Description
Breast or formula feeding is a personal and challenging decision for any new parent. Breastfeeding goes beyond the mother-baby dyad, having profound implications across different societal contexts, including financially and medically. Although a natural form of feeding, breastfeeding can be difficult and isolating if it does not come easily. A mother's first contact for help is usually at her newborn's first primary care appointment. However, these appointments are insufficient in allowing the healthcare provider to answer breastfeeding concerns or questions. A quality improvement project was conducted at a pediatric primary care clinic in the southeast valley of Arizona after approval was granted by an Institutional Review Board. Eight participants were recruited, and four completed the project. This project focused on extending the newborn appointment by 15 minutes to provide an educational resource binder and address breastfeeding questions. The Bristol Breastfeeding Assessment Tool (BBAT) was utilized to determine the mother's self-efficacy towards breastfeeding since the Theory of Self-Efficacy was the foundation for this project. Weekly follow-up telephone calls were conducted to address the mother's questions. The project concluded at the one-month appointment, where BBAT was performed again. The BBAT scores demonstrated an increase in breastfeeding self-efficacy. The participants were also evaluated if the project aided their breastfeeding journey. Every participant was breastfeeding by the one-month appointment except one who was not exclusively breastfeeding. In addition, all preferred the extended-length newborn appointments, educational binder, and weekly phone calls. Qualitative theming supported the use and continuation of the project for future mothers.
ContributorsScott, Taryne (Author) / Bay, Sarah (Thesis advisor) / College of Nursing and Health Innovation (Contributor)
Created2023-04-28