Ineffective transitional care programs for ensuring the continuation of care from acute settings to the home settings post discharge can result in rehospitalization of elderly patients with chronic diseases. Usually, transitional care should be time-sensitive, patient-centered services intended to ensure continuity of care and an efficient transition between health care settings or home. A patient centered transitional care program was implemented at an outpatient primary care facility to reduce readmission rates. Institutional Review Board approval was obtained.

Twenty adult patients with chronic diseases discharged from an acute setting were identified. A follow up phone call and/or a home visit within 24-72 hours post discharge was employed. The Care Transitions Measure (CTM®) and Medication Discrepancy Tool (MDT®) were utilized to identify quality of care of transition and medication discrepancies. A chart audit collected data on the age of participant, diagnosis for initial hospitalization, CTM score, home visit, and ED visits or re-hospitalizations after 30 days of discharge. The outcome indicated that transitional care within primary care utilizing evidence-based practices is beneficial in reducing readmission rates. A logistic regression showed model significance, p = .002, suggesting that the CTM score was effective for both telephone support (TS) and home visit (HV).

A correlation analysis showed that as age of participants increased, the CTM score decreased, indicating that older adults required more support. A significance p <.001, of a proportional test indicated that readmission rates after the intervention was lower. It is evident that providing a timely and effective transitional care intervention in a primary care setting can reduce hospital readmissions, improve symptom management and quality of life of adult patients with chronic diseases.

Approximately 15,270 children were diagnosed with cancer last year and a common treatment includes daily radiation therapy. Children must remain immobilized for the planning and treatment to ensure the radiation beam precisely delivers radiation to the tumor and reduces exposure to the normal surrounding tissue. Radiation therapy may last several weeks, which requires children to be put under daily anesthesia for an extended length of time to ensure immobilization. The risks for anesthesia include airway obstruction, broncho/laryngospasm, oxygen desaturation, apnea, nausea/vomiting, hypothermia, hypotension, hypoxia, cardiac arrest, sepsis due to central line access, and death. The relationship between daily anesthesia administration and neurotoxicity is currently unclear.

The purpose of audiovisual distraction (AVD) during radiation therapy was to decrease anesthesia exposure, improve quality of life, and decrease anxiety of patients and families. A plan to implement an AVD device at the time of radiation planning and during daily treatments was conducted in a large pediatric radiation oncology practice in Arizona. Inclusion criteria were children needing radiation, between the ages of 5 and 15, who do not have history or complaint of visual impairment, who have the ability to follow directions for AVD, and were deemed candidates by the Radiation Oncologist and Child Life Specialist through physical and mental assessment. Data collection included anesthesia requirements, heart rate, PedsQL Tool, and time in treatment room gathered at the planning session and at the end of treatment. Microsoft SPSS was used for data analysis. Descriptive statistics were used to describe the sample and outcome variables.

The aggregated data was analyzed to ascertain if the number of children in the inclusion age range had a decreased need for anesthesia, decreased anxiety, and increased quality of life. The primary outcome for the AVD was: all four children who participated were able to undergo radiation therapy without the need for anesthesia . The children were able to remain awake for treatment could attend school, as permissible, eat before treatment, and spend significantly less time at the treatment facility. The concern of repetitive anesthesia and neurotoxicity will not be a factor in the child’s long term late effects of treatment. The reduction of need on anesthesia staff and nursing staff was estimated to save over 500,000 dollars for the 89 treatments the four children underwent with the AVD. The benefits of the intervention not only provided a better treatment experience for all children, but it allowed the facility to utilize the treatment machine more efficiently, providing radiation therapy as an option to even more patients.