Matching Items (50)
Description
As the Director of Student Affairs for a developing two-year hybrid Doctor of Physical Therapy (DPT) program, I was tasked with developing a program to support the academic success of students. Limited evidence was available on supporting students who were geographically separated from campus during most of their preparation because hybrid programs only recently emerged. Academic coaching has been used in medical education and recently in hybrid DPT programs to support students’ academic and professional development. Coaching differs from advising and mentoring because it was focused on building relationships between students and coaches to promote students’ self-reflection, growth, persistence, and agency. I used asynchronous instructional videos, in-person workshops, and an online community of practice to train and support faculty members to serve as coaches. Coach training focused on specific coaching concepts including listening empathetically, asking powerful questions, and adhering to a coaching session structure. At orientation, faculty member coaches (FMCs) met with their 8-10 students in a group setting and also 1:1 to build rapport and establish communication. Subsequently, FMCs engaged each student in a coaching session twice, during the midterm of each of the first two academic terms of the program. In this mixed methods study, I employed quantitative survey and qualitative interview methods to evaluate faculty members’ attitudes, skills, and self-efficacy for serving as a coach as well as their relatedness to students. Additionally, I explored students’ perceptions of coach support, relatedness to their coach, and relatedness to peers. FMCs demonstrated increases in attitudes, perceived skills, and self-efficacy for the key coaching concepts because of the training. They rated their relatedness to students high and reported that building connections with students was a rewarding aspect of coaching. Similarly, students rated their coach and peers highly with respect to relatedness and had positive perspectives toward coaches’ support. FMCs were challenged by the time commitment to the coaching process. Moreover, students yearned for more opportunities to connect with their coach and peers. In the discussion, I highlighted the complementarity of the quantitative and qualitative outcomes, connected the findings to theoretical perspectives, and proposed implications for practice and for future research.
ContributorsBlack, Kayla Dawn (Author) / Buss, Ray R (Thesis advisor) / Kulinna, Pamela (Committee member) / Gagnon, Kendra (Committee member) / Arizona State University (Publisher)
Created2023
Description
Active-duty service members pursuing college degrees face many obstacles due to their military service, such as frequent relocation, long work hours, extended field time, and deployments. While online learning makes higher education more accessible to service members, asynchronous courses can leave active-duty students feeling that online education is lacking in social or peer connection. The purpose of this action research study was to use the Community of Inquiry Framework, as well as Self-Determination Theory, to investigate the results of an intervention, called the R&R Journal, on the social presence, cognitive presence, attitude, and overall academic outcome of active-duty service members enrolled in online, asynchronous HIST 1301 at Central Texas College. This study uses a quasi-experimental concurrent mixed methods design with both treatment and comparison course groups. Results indicate that active-duty students who participated in the intervention increased in social presence, cognitive presence, and overall academic outcome over the course of HIST 1301. Implications for practice include (a) increasing social presence by encouraging peer to peer connection in an asynchronous course through deeper analysis of discussion boards, (b) increasing cognitive presence by challenging students to make personal connections to course material, and (c) increasing cognitive presence by encouraging relevant, modern-day connections to course material.
ContributorsGreene, Emily (Author) / Weinberg, Andrea (Thesis advisor) / Griswold, Philip (Committee member) / Archambault, Leanna (Committee member) / Arizona State University (Publisher)
Created2022
Description
Arizona continues to implement the 4-hour ELD block despite opposition and concerns regarding is appropriateness and effectiveness. Research using state and national assessments show that English language learners continue to fall behind their English proficient peers in reading achievement even after the implementation of the 4-hour ELD block. In general, there is no proven direct correlation between the program and underachievement. This study evaluated the impact of the 4-hour ELD block on reading achievement by comparing similar reading-abled students that were in the program with students that were not. The study was conducted in a district located in a predominately Hispanic poor community in order to eliminate social and economical factors that could disadvantage one group over the other. The findings demonstrated there were no significant differences in the reading achievement between both groups, supporting arguments that the 4-hour ELD block has made little to no impact for ELL students. However, results demonstrate that early intervention may be significant in explaining increases in reading achievement.
ContributorsSánchez, Arturo (Author) / Schugurensky, Daniel, 1958- (Thesis advisor) / Garcia, Eugene E. (Thesis advisor) / Chavez, Jacob A. (Committee member) / Arizona State University (Publisher)
Created2019
Description
The purposes of this study were (1) to examine the direct and indirect effect of school-level testing policies on reading achievement though changes in amount and types of reading instruction, (2) to investigate the reading trajectories moderated by school-level testing policies longitudinally, and (3) to examine the relationship between testing policies and the achievement gap by exploring whether certain student characteristics moderate the relationship between testing policy and reading achievement, using Early Childhood Longitudinal Study Kindergarten (ECLS-K) Cohort of 2010-2011 data. Findings from a multilevel full structural mediation model suggest that school-level frequency of state/local standardized tests had an indirect effect on student reading achievement through changes in both amount and the types of instruction at the school-level (cross-sectional fall kindergarten sample =12,241 children nested in 1,067 kindergarten classes). The findings from a three-level growth models indicated only children of Asian background and children from high socio-economic backgrounds who had frequent standardized tests in kindergarten accelerated in their monthly reading growth, whereas other children (e.g., low SES, non-Asian children) did not show any changes in the rate of the reading growth (longitudinal sample from fall of kindergarten to spring of first grade = 7,392 children nested in 744 kindergartens). The findings from the current study suggest that testing policy is not an effective means to reduce the achievement gap of children from disadvantaged family backgrounds, underperforming children or that children from low socieo-economic backgrounds. These children did not seem to benefit from frequent standardized tests longitudinally. Implications for supporting school assessment practices and instruction are discussed.
ContributorsIm, Haesung (Author) / Nakagawa, Kathryn (Thesis advisor) / Thompson, Marilyn (Committee member) / Swadener, Elizabeth (Committee member) / Iida, Masumi (Committee member) / Arizona State University (Publisher)
Created2015
Description
Transfer students have emerged as a growing student population in higher education. There is a need for higher education professionals to understand the needs of transfer students. In this study, the implemented intervention consisted of restructuring retention programming for first-semester transfer students. This qualitative action research study explored how first-semester transfer students understand and experience academic and social engagement across the semester they participate in retention programming. Students identified perceived barriers and facilitators to engagement. The researcher also examined transfer students’ experiences of the intervention. The findings indicate that students’ understanding of engagement align with their expectations of their first semester and remained consistent throughout the study. One of the biggest perceived barriers to engagement was lack of time. Overall, transfer students found the intervention useful during their transition to a new institution.
ContributorsKulhanek, Kristy Lynn (Author) / Bernstein, Katie (Thesis advisor) / Wilcox, Jeanne (Committee member) / Edwards, Sarah (Committee member) / Dorn, Sherman (Committee member) / Arizona State University (Publisher)
Created2019
Description
Employee-owned businesses, benefit corporations, social enterprises, and other sustainability entrepreneurship innovations are responding to challenges such as climate change, economic inequalities, and unethical business behavior. Academic programs to date, however, often fall short in sufficiently equipping students with competencies in sustainability entrepreneurship – from a coherent set of learning objectives, through effective and engaging pedagogies, to rigorous assessment of learning outcomes. This dissertation contributes to bridging these gaps. The first study proposes a process-oriented and literature-based framework of sustainability entrepreneurship competencies. It offers a general vision for students, faculty, and entrepreneurs, as well as for the design of curricula, courses, and assessments. The second study presents an exploration into the nature of sustainability entrepreneurship courses, with a focus on teaching and learning processes. Using pioneering courses at Arizona State University, the study analyzes and compares the links between learning objectives, pedagogies, and learning outcomes. Based on document analysis and semi-structured interviews with course instructors, the study identifies cognitive apprenticeship from input processing to experimentation, constructive alignment from learning objectives to assessments, and curriculum-level coordination across courses as key success factors of sustainability entrepreneurship education. The result of this study can inform instructors and researchers in applying and further substantiating effective educational models for future entrepreneurs. The third study addresses the key question of competence assessment: what are reliable tools for assessing students’ competence in sustainability entrepreneurship? This study developed and tested a novel tool for assessing students’ competence in sustainability entrepreneurship through in-vivo simulated professional situations. The tool was in different settings and evaluated against a set of criteria derived from the literature. To inform educators in business and management programs, this study discusses and concludes under which conditions this assessment tool seems most effective, as well as improvement for future applications of the tool.
ContributorsFoucrier, Tamsin (Author) / Wiek, Arnim (Thesis advisor) / Basile, George (Thesis advisor) / Barth, Matthias (Committee member) / Arizona State University (Publisher)
Created2020
Description
Student tardiness has not received as much attention as absences in research on school attendance, despite the disruptions to learning it can cause. The purpose of this study was to design, implement, and study an alternative intervention—the Student Training for a Restorative Outlook for Needed Growth (S.T.R.O.N.G.) Program—to the existing punitive tardy detention practice at a high school where tardiness was a problem. The program promoted on-time behavior to school and class by utilizing positive restorative practice elements along with self-paced learning modules focused on growth mindset, goal setting, punctuality, and organizational skills. The driving force behind the creation of the S.T.R.O.N.G. Program was to determine if this intervention could support a change in students’ intent to be on time for class. Students in the S.T.R.O.N.G. Program intervention participated in three steps, beginning with individual restorative conversations and a group restorative conversation. In the second step, students engaged in learning module lessons related to growth mindset, goal setting, punctuality, and organizational skills. After each learning module, students reflected on their learning in individual journals. In the final step, students exited the intervention with a student feedback form. This mixed-methods action research study involved collecting data from interviews, surveys, and reflective journals. Thirteen students participated in the intervention and took an initial student intake questionnaire asking them about their student experiences in the existing punitive tardy detention practice. Qualitative data were coded, analyzed, and used with quantitative data to triangulate findings. The results of the study indicated that students were not in favor of the existing punitive tardy detention practice and preferred an alternative, positive tardy practice that supported self-improvement to help with their on-time behavior. Results also showed the S.T.R.O.N.G. Program to be useful and effective at teaching students information related to the constructs in the learning modules, resulting in students declaring a positive attitude.
ContributorsRobertson, Christopher Bryce (Author) / Harris, Lauren M (Thesis advisor) / Hermanns, Carl (Committee member) / Steitz, Julie (Committee member) / Arizona State University (Publisher)
Created2022
Description
This paper presents a Bayesian framework for evaluative classification. Current education policy debates center on arguments about whether and how to use student test score data in school and personnel evaluation. Proponents of such use argue that refusing to use data violates both the public’s need to hold schools accountable when they use taxpayer dollars and students’ right to educational opportunities. Opponents of formulaic use of test-score data argue that most standardized test data is susceptible to fatal technical flaws, is a partial picture of student achievement, and leads to behavior that corrupts the measures.
A Bayesian perspective on summative ordinal classification is a possible framework for combining quantitative outcome data for students with the qualitative types of evaluation that critics of high-stakes testing advocate. This paper describes the key characteristics of a Bayesian perspective on classification, describes a method to translate a naïve Bayesian classifier into a point-based system for evaluation, and draws conclusions from the comparison on the construction of algorithmic (including point-based) systems that could capture the political and practical benefits of a Bayesian approach. The most important practical conclusion is that point-based systems with fixed components and weights cannot capture the dynamic and political benefits of a reciprocal relationship between professional judgment and quantitative student outcome data.
ContributorsDorn, Sherman (Author) / Mary Lou Fulton Teachers College (Contributor)
Created2009
Description
Over the last decade, post-secondary international student enrollment has grown in the United States (US). In part, this growth has been facilitated by an increasing number of third-party recruitment partnerships; wherein US universities sign agreements to allow parties to engage in the recruitment and advising of students. By creating and expanding partnerships the university seeks to enroll more students at their university. With these additional parties involved in the advising process, it is more important than ever that students have as much information as possible to make an enrollment decision that makes them feel like they are members of the campus community and that they belong. To attain feelings of membership and belonging the university staff and faculty should be reaching out to students early in their academic career about the resources that are likely to enhance their feelings of membership and belonging at university. To understand and improve students’ feelings of membership and belonging the researcher developed a mixed-method intervention that included a control and experimental group. All groups completed a pre-posttest survey. The experimental group was exposed to 1:1 belongingness advising sessions and debriefing interviews. Twenty-two first-year international students participated in the study. The intervention had two objectives: 1) understand how a semester-long advising program, in the students first-year, enhanced international students feeling of membership and belonging at the university; and what components of the program were most effective and 2) based on how students were recruited to university, how did they differ in their developing feelings of belongingness and membership. The intervention was informed by agency theory, dropout model, and previous research on students’ feelings of membership and belonging. The results suggested that students in the experimental group were more likely to feel like members of the university when compared to their control group peers. Additionally, the results suggest that students in the experimental group were able to build relationships, knowledge, and support systems that enhanced their feelings of belonging. The discussion explains these outcomes as they are related to the research questions and extant literature. It also summarizes, implications for practice, future research, and lessons learned.
ContributorsVerhulst, Stene Allen (Author) / Marsh, Josephine (Thesis advisor) / Kim, Jeongeun (Committee member) / Bruce, Gonzalo (Committee member) / Arizona State University (Publisher)
Created2020
Description
Although an integral part of the pedagogical process is the evaluation of students, questions remain about the purpose and characteristics of effective assessments. Assessments should benefit both the instructor and the student, but this could be a challenge in large classes, such as the English service courses offered at the University of Guyana (UG), which are compulsory courses offered to over 2,000 first year students annually. However, the transition to online delivery of these courses because of the Coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic has offered new opportunities for innovation in relation to course assessments. Consequently, this Action Research study was undertaken with the intention of improving the methods of assessment in the course, Introduction to the Use of English (ENG 1105), one of the three English service courses currently offered at UG.Multiple methods of data collection, including surveys, and semi-structured interviews, observations and analyses were used to determine how the assessment strategies used in the course helped develop academic self-efficacy in students and prepare them for other courses in their programs of study. The findings from the first two cycles of this study suggest that while the current assessment methods used in the course are beneficial to both lecturers and students, there is a need to adjust aspects of the assessments so students benefit from assessments that better align with other courses in their programs, as well as sharpen their English language skills. The third cycle captures the impact that the use of an innovation-an ungraded portfolio-had on student learning and suggests it should become a regular feature in the English service courses.
ContributorsMc Gowan, Mark Alastair (Author) / Thompson, Nicole L (Thesis advisor) / Fischman, Gustavo E (Committee member) / Wolf, Leigh G (Committee member) / Arizona State University (Publisher)
Created2023