The activation of the primary motor cortex (M1) is common in speech perception tasks that involve difficult listening conditions. Although the challenge of recognizing and discriminating non-native speech sounds appears to be an instantiation of listening under difficult circumstances, it is still unknown if M1 recruitment is facilitatory of second…
The activation of the primary motor cortex (M1) is common in speech perception tasks that involve difficult listening conditions. Although the challenge of recognizing and discriminating non-native speech sounds appears to be an instantiation of listening under difficult circumstances, it is still unknown if M1 recruitment is facilitatory of second language speech perception. The purpose of this study was to investigate the role of M1 associated with speech motor centers in processing acoustic inputs in the native (L1) and second language (L2), using repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (rTMS) to selectively alter neural activity in M1. Thirty-six healthy English/Spanish bilingual subjects participated in the experiment. The performance on a listening word-to-picture matching task was measured before and after real- and sham-rTMS to the orbicularis oris (lip muscle) associated M1. Vowel Space Area (VSA) obtained from recordings of participants reading a passage in L2 before and after real-rTMS, was calculated to determine its utility as an rTMS aftereffect measure. There was high variability in the aftereffect of the rTMS protocol to the lip muscle among the participants. Approximately 50% of participants showed an inhibitory effect of rTMS, evidenced by smaller motor evoked potentials (MEPs) area, whereas the other 50% had a facilitatory effect, with larger MEPs. This suggests that rTMS has a complex influence on M1 excitability, and relying on grand-average results can obscure important individual differences in rTMS physiological and functional outcomes. Evidence of motor support to word recognition in the L2 was found. Participants showing an inhibitory aftereffect of rTMS on M1 produced slower and less accurate responses in the L2 task, whereas those showing a facilitatory aftereffect of rTMS on M1 produced more accurate responses in L2. In contrast, no effect of rTMS was found on the L1, where accuracy and speed were very similar after sham- and real-rTMS. The L2 VSA measure was indicative of the aftereffect of rTMS to M1 associated with speech production, supporting its utility as an rTMS aftereffect measure. This result revealed an interesting and novel relation between cerebral motor cortex activation and speech measures.
Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) is a non-invasive brain stimulation technique used in a variety of research settings, including speech neuroscience studies. However, one of the difficulties in using TMS for speech studies is the time that it takes to localize the lip motor cortex representation on the scalp. For my…
Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) is a non-invasive brain stimulation technique used in a variety of research settings, including speech neuroscience studies. However, one of the difficulties in using TMS for speech studies is the time that it takes to localize the lip motor cortex representation on the scalp. For my project, I used MATLAB to create a software package that facilitates the localization of the ‘hotspot’ for TMS studies in a systematic, reliable manner. The software sends TMS pulses at certain locations, collects electromyography (EMG) data, and extracts motor-evoked potentials (MEPs) to help users visualize the resulting muscle activation. In this way, users can systematically find the subject’s hotspot for TMS stimulation of the motor cortex. The hotspot detection software was found to be an effective and efficient improvement on previous localization methods.
