<?xml version="1.0"?>
<OAI-PMH xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/OAI-PMH.xsd"><responseDate>2026-05-21T04:13:37Z</responseDate><request verb="GetRecord" metadataPrefix="oai_dc">https://keep.lib.asu.edu/oai/request</request><GetRecord><record><header><identifier>oai:keep.lib.asu.edu:node-198529</identifier><datestamp>2025-01-31T21:35:18Z</datestamp><setSpec>oai_pmh:all</setSpec><setSpec>oai_pmh:repo_items</setSpec></header><metadata><oai_dc:dc xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd"><dc:identifier>198529</dc:identifier>
          <dc:identifier>https://hdl.handle.net/2286/R.2.N.198529</dc:identifier>
                  <dc:rights>http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/</dc:rights>
          <dc:rights>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0</dc:rights>
                  <dc:date>2024-12</dc:date>
                  <dc:format>25 pages</dc:format>
                  <dc:contributor>Nguyen, Dan</dc:contributor>
          <dc:contributor>Kaneris, Marianna</dc:contributor>
          <dc:contributor>Yonas, Albert</dc:contributor>
          <dc:contributor>Barrett, The Honors College</dc:contributor>
          <dc:contributor>School of Social and Behavioral Sciences</dc:contributor>
          <dc:contributor>Division of Teacher Preparation</dc:contributor>
                  <dc:type>Text</dc:type>
                  <dc:description>This study examined visual cues required for a trompe l’oeil, a 2D image designed to appear real, to convincingly &quot;fool the eye.&quot; A pilot experiment tested whether greater perceived depth made stimuli appear fake from farther away. Fourteen ASU students evaluated five realistic images, noting distances where perception shifted. Although a trompe l&#039;oeil effect was observed, results were not statistically significant. A follow-up with 15 students tested three orientations of the same object, hypothesizing the largest angle would be the least convincing. Results revealed a &quot;Goldilocks effect,&quot; with the middle angle fooling the least. However, repeated measures ANOVAs showed no significant differences, warranting further research.</dc:description>
                  <dc:subject>Vision</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>Perception</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>Visual perception</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>Trompe l&#039;oeil</dc:subject>
                  <dc:title>The Impact of Photographic Depth on Visual Perception of Realism</dc:title></oai_dc:dc></metadata></record></GetRecord></OAI-PMH>
