2026-05-23T14:45:41Zhttps://keep.lib.asu.edu/oai/request

oai:keep.lib.asu.edu:node-1877232024-12-23T18:01:48Zoai_pmh:alloai_pmh:repo_items

187723 https://hdl.handle.net/2286/R.2.N.187723 http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/ All Rights Reserved 2023 174 pages Doctoral Dissertation Academic theses Text eng Cosgrove, Kelly Sarah Wharton, Christopher Adams, Marc DesRoches, Tyler Grebitus, Carola Johnston, Carol Arizona State University Partial requirement for: Ph.D., Arizona State University, 2023 Field of study: Exercise and Nutritional Sciences Tools designed to help match people with behaviors they identify as likely to lead to a successful behavioral outcome remain under-researched. This study assessed the effect of a participant-driven behavior-matching intervention on 1) the adoption of a new behavior related to fruit and vegetable (F&V) consumption, 2) study attrition, and 3) changes in F&V consumption. In this two-arm randomized controlled trial, 64 adults who did not meet standard F&V recommendations were allocated to an intervention (n=33) or control group (n=31). Participants in the intervention group ranked 20 F&V-related behaviors according to their perceived likelihood of engagement in the behavior and their perception of the behavior’s efficacy in increasing F&V consumption. Participants in the intervention group were subsequently shown the list of 20 behaviors in order of their provided rankings, with the highest-ranked behaviors at the top, and were asked to choose a behavior they would like to perform daily for 4 weeks. The control group chose from a random-order list of the same 20 behaviors to adopt daily for 4 weeks. During the study period, text messages were sent to all participants 90 minutes before their reported bedtime to collect Yes/No data reflecting successful behavior engagement each day. The binary repeated-measures data collected from the text messages was analyzed using mixed-effects logistic regression, differences in attrition were assessed using log-rank analysis, and change scores in F&V consumption were compared between the two groups using the Man-Whitney U test. P<0.05 indicated significance. The rate of successful behavior adoption did not differ significantly between the two groups (b=0.09, 95%CI= -0.81, 0.98, p=0.85). The log rank test results indicated that there was no significant difference in attrition between the two groups (χ2=2.68, df=1, p=0.10). F&V consumption increased significantly over the 4 weeks in the total sample (Z=-5.86, p<0.001), but no differences in F&V change scores were identified between the control and intervention groups (Z=-0.21, p=0.84). The behavior-matching tool assessed in this study did not significantly improve behavior adoption, study attrition, or F&V intake over 4 weeks. Health Sciences Nutrition Behavioral Sciences Effects of a Behavior-Matching Tool on Behavior Adoption and Attrition in an eHealth Intervention Focused on Fruit and Vegetable Consumption