<?xml version="1.0"?>
<OAI-PMH xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/OAI-PMH.xsd"><responseDate>2026-05-23T03:11:28Z</responseDate><request verb="GetRecord" metadataPrefix="oai_dc">https://keep.lib.asu.edu/oai/request</request><GetRecord><record><header><identifier>oai:keep.lib.asu.edu:node-150343</identifier><datestamp>2024-12-20T18:25:12Z</datestamp><setSpec>oai_pmh:all</setSpec><setSpec>oai_pmh:repo_items</setSpec></header><metadata><oai_dc:dc xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd"><dc:identifier>150343</dc:identifier>
          <dc:identifier>https://hdl.handle.net/2286/R.I.14366</dc:identifier>
                  <dc:rights>http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/</dc:rights>
          <dc:rights>All Rights Reserved</dc:rights>
                  <dc:date>2011</dc:date>
                  <dc:format>xliii, 408 p. : ill</dc:format>
                  <dc:type>Doctoral Dissertation</dc:type>
          <dc:type>Academic theses</dc:type>
          <dc:type>Text</dc:type>
                  <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
                  <dc:contributor>Whaley, Shawn D</dc:contributor>
          <dc:contributor>Culbertson, Robert J.</dc:contributor>
          <dc:contributor>Herbots, Nicole</dc:contributor>
          <dc:contributor>Rez, Peter</dc:contributor>
          <dc:contributor>Marzke, Robert F</dc:contributor>
          <dc:contributor>Lindsay, Stuart</dc:contributor>
          <dc:contributor>Chamberlin, Ralph V</dc:contributor>
          <dc:contributor>Arizona State University</dc:contributor>
                  <dc:description>Partial requirement for: Ph.D., Arizona State University, 2011</dc:description>
          <dc:description>Includes bibliographical references</dc:description>
          <dc:description>Field of study: Physics</dc:description>
          <dc:description>In this work, a new method, &quot;Nanobonding&quot; [1,2] is conceived and researched to bond Si-based surfaces, via nucleation and growth of a 2 D silicon oxide SiOxHx interphase connecting the surfaces at the nanoscale across macroscopic domains. Nanobonding cross-bridges two smooth surfaces put into mechanical contact in an O2/H2O mixed ambient below T &lt;200 °C via arrays of SiOxHx molecules connecting into a continuous macroscopic bonding interphase. Nano-scale surface planarization via wet chemical processing and new spin technology are compared via Tapping Mode Atomic Force Microscopy (TMAFM) , before and after nano-bonding. Nanobonding uses precursor phases, 2D nano-films of beta-cristobalite (beta-c) SiO2, nucleated on Si(100) via the Herbots-Atluri (H-A) method [1]. beta-c SiO2 on Si(100) is ordered and flat with atomic terraces over 20 nm wide, well above 2 nm found in native oxides. When contacted with SiO2 this ultra-smooth nanophase can nucleate and grow domains with cross-bridging molecular strands of hydroxylated SiOx, instead of point contacts. The high density of molecular bonds across extended terraces forms a strong bond between Si-based substrates, nano- bonding [2] the Si and silica. A new model of beta-cristobalite SiO2 with its &lt;110&gt; axis aligned along Si[100] direction is simulated via ab-initio methods in a nano-bonded stack with beta-c SiO2 in contact with amorphous SiO2 (a-SiO2), modelling cross-bridging molecular bonds between beta-c SiO2 on Si(100) and a-SiO2 as during nanobonding. Computed total energies are compared with those found for Si(100) and a-SiO2 and show that the presence of two lattice cells of !-c SiO2 on Si(100) and a-SiO2 lowers energy when compared to Si(100)/ a-SiO2 Shadow cone calculations on three models of beta-c SiO2 on Si(100) are compared with Ion Beam Analysis of H-A processed Si(100). Total surface energy measurements via 3 liquid contact angle analysis of Si(100) after H-A method processing are also compared. By combining nanobonding experiments, TMAFM results, surface energy data, and ab-initio calculations, an atomistic model is derived and nanobonding is optimized. [1] US Patent 6,613,677 (9/2/03), 7,851,365 (12/14/10), [2] Patent Filed: 4/30/09, 10/1/2011</dc:description>
                  <dc:subject>Physics</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>Materials Science</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>Bonding</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>Oxides</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>Silicon</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>Wafer</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>Semiconductor wafers</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>nanotechnology</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>Silicon oxide</dc:subject>
          <dc:subject>Semiconductors--Bonding.</dc:subject>
                  <dc:title>Nano-bonding of silicon oxides-based surfaces at low temperature: bonding interphase modeling via molecular dynamics and characterization of bonding surfaces topography, hydro-affinity and free energy</dc:title></oai_dc:dc></metadata></record></GetRecord></OAI-PMH>
