2026-05-24T16:21:27Zhttps://keep.lib.asu.edu/oai/request

oai:keep.lib.asu.edu:node-1413222021-07-04T20:34:34Zoai_pmh:alloai_pmh:repo_items

141322 https://hdl.handle.net/2286/R.I.44522 <p>Cramer, R.J., Neal, T.M.S., &amp; Brodsky, S.L. (2009). Self-efficacy and confidence: Theoretical distinctions and implications for trial consultation. Consulting Psychology Journal: Practice and Research, 61, 319-334. DOI: 10.1037/a0017310</p> 10.1037/a0017310 http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/ 2009 eng Cramer, Robert J. Neal, Tess M.S. Brodsky, Stanley L. Text <p>Self-Efficacy Theory (SET; Bandura, 1986, 2000) has generated research and practice ramifications across areas of psychology. However, self-efficacy has yet to be assessed in a legal context. The present paper juxtaposes self-efficacy with self-confidence in terms of theoretical foundations and practical implications, with attention to the area of witness testimony. It is concluded that the concept of witness self-efficacy possesses thorough theoretical grounding as a potential target for witness preparation. As such, we put forth an integrated model of witness preparation featuring self-efficacy bolstering techniques within an established witness training framework.</p> Self-efficacy Confidence witness Testimony witness preparation Self-Efficacy and Confidence: Theoretical Distinctions and Implications for Trial Consultation