Description
In previous work, the effects of power extraction for onboard electrical equipment and flight control systems were studied to determine which turbine shaft (i.e. high power shaft vs low power shaft) is best suited for power extraction. This thesis will

In previous work, the effects of power extraction for onboard electrical equipment and flight control systems were studied to determine which turbine shaft (i.e. high power shaft vs low power shaft) is best suited for power extraction. This thesis will look into an alternative option, a three-spool design with a high-pressure turbine, low-pressure turbine, and a turbine dedicated to driving the fan. One of the three-spool turbines is designed to be a vaneless counter-rotating turbine. The off-design performance of this new design will be compared to the traditional two-spool design to determine if the additional spool is a practical alternative to current designs for high shaft horsepower extraction requirements. Upon analysis, this thesis has shown that a three-spool engine with a vaneless counter-rotating stage has worse performance characteristics than traditional two-spool designs for UAV systems.
Downloads
PDF (2.8 MB)

Details

Title
  • Comparison of traditional two-spool and three-spool with vaneless counter-rotating: low-pressure turbine for aircraft propulsion power extraction
Contributors
Date Created
2019
Resource Type
  • Text
  • Collections this item is in
    Note
    • thesis
      Partial requirement for: M.S., Arizona State University, 2019
    • bibliography
      Includes bibliographical references (pages 63-64)
    • Field of study: Aerospace Engineering

    Citation and reuse

    Statement of Responsibility

    by Luke Micheal Burgett

    Machine-readable links