Skip to main content

ASU Global menu

Skip to Content Report an accessibility problem ASU Home My ASU Colleges and Schools Sign In
Arizona State University Arizona State University
ASU Library KEEP

Main navigation

Home Browse Collections Share Your Work
Copyright Describe Your Materials File Formats Open Access Repository Practices Share Your Materials Terms of Deposit API Documentation
Skip to Content Report an accessibility problem ASU Home My ASU Colleges and Schools Sign In
  1. KEEP
  2. Theses and Dissertations
  3. ASU Electronic Theses and Dissertations
  4. Effect of personalized learning paths on learning quadratics in algebra
  5. Full metadata

Effect of personalized learning paths on learning quadratics in algebra

Full metadata

Description

This study was conducted to assess the performance of 176 students who received algebra instruction through an online platform presented in one of two experimental conditions to explore the effect of personalized learning paths by comparing it with linearly flowing instruction. The study was designed around eight research questions investigating the effect of personalized learning paths on students’ learning, intrinsic motivation and satisfaction with their experience. Quantitative results were analyzed using Analysis of Variance (ANOVA), Analysis of Covariance (ANCOVA) and split-plot ANOVA methods. Additionally, qualitative feedback data were gathered from students and teachers on their experience to better explain the quantitative findings as well as improve understanding of how to effectively design an adaptive personalized learning platform. Quantitative results of the study showed no statistical difference between students assigned to treatments that compared linear and adaptive personalized instructional flows.

The lack of significant differences was explained by two main factors: (a) low usage and (b) platform and content related issues. Low usage may have prevented students from being exposed to the platforms long enough to create a potential for differences between the groups. Additionally, the reasons for low usage may in part be explained by the qualitative findings, which indicated that unmotivated and tired teachers and students were not very enthusiastic about the study because it occurred near the end of school year. Further, computer access was a challenging issue at the school throughout the study. On the other hand, platform and content related issues worked to inhibit the potential beneficial effects of the platforms. The three prominent issues were: (a) the majority of the students found the content boring or difficult, (b) repeated recommendations from the adaptive platform created frustration, and (c) a barely moving progress bar caused disappointment among participants.

Date Created
2015
Contributors
  • Bicer, Alpay (Author)
  • Bitter, Gary G. (Thesis advisor)
  • Buss, Ray R (Committee member)
  • Legacy, Jane M. (Committee member)
  • Arizona State University (Publisher)
Topical Subject
  • Educational technology
  • Mathematics Education
  • instructional design
  • Adaptive learning
  • Embedded Assessments
  • Interactive multimedia
  • Mathematics Education
  • Personalized Learning
  • Quadratics in Algebra
  • Equations, Quadratic--Study and teaching.
  • Equations, Quadratic
  • Equations, Quadratic--Computer-assisted instruction.
  • Equations, Quadratic
  • Algebraic functions--Study and teaching.
  • Algebraic functions
  • Algebraic functions--Computer-assisted instruction.
  • Algebraic functions
  • Individualized instruction--Computer-assisted instruction.
  • Individualized instruction
Resource Type
Text
Genre
Doctoral Dissertation
Academic theses
Extent
xii, 106 pages : illustrations (chiefly color)
Language
eng
Copyright Statement
In Copyright
Reuse Permissions
All Rights Reserved
Primary Member of
ASU Electronic Theses and Dissertations
Peer-reviewed
No
Open Access
No
Handle
https://hdl.handle.net/2286/R.I.36407
Statement of Responsibility
by Alpay Bicer
Description Source
Viewed on February 4, 2016
Level of coding
full
Note
Partial requirement for: Ph.D., Arizona State University, 2015
Note type
thesis
Includes bibliographical references (pages 62-66)
Note type
bibliography
Field of study: Educational technology
System Created
  • 2016-02-01 07:02:53
System Modified
  • 2021-08-30 01:25:58
  •     
  • 8 months 2 weeks ago
Additional Formats
  • OAI Dublin Core
  • MODS XML

Quick actions

About this item

Overview
 Copy permalink

Explore this item

Explore Document

Share this content

Feedback

ASU University Technology Office Arizona State University.
KEEP

Contact Us

Repository Services
Home KEEP PRISM Dataverse
Resources
Terms of Deposit Sharing Materials: ASU Digital Repository Guide Open Access at ASU

The ASU Library acknowledges the twenty-two Native Nations that have inhabited this land for centuries. Arizona State University's four campuses are located in the Salt River Valley on ancestral territories of Indigenous peoples, including the Akimel O’odham (Pima) and Pee Posh (Maricopa) Indian Communities, whose care and keeping of these lands allows us to be here today. ASU Library acknowledges the sovereignty of these nations and seeks to foster an environment of success and possibility for Native American students and patrons. We are advocates for the incorporation of Indigenous knowledge systems and research methodologies within contemporary library practice. ASU Library welcomes members of the Akimel O’odham and Pee Posh, and all Native nations to the Library.

Number one in the U.S. for innovation. #1 ASU, #2 Stanford, #3 MIT. - U.S. News and World Report, 5 years, 2016-2020
Maps and Locations Jobs Directory Contact ASU My ASU
Copyright and Trademark Accessibility Privacy Terms of Use Emergency