Description

At present, the ideological bias in the human enhancement debate holds that opponents to human enhancement are primarily techno-conservatives who, lacking any reasonable, systematic account of why we ought to

At present, the ideological bias in the human enhancement debate holds that opponents to human enhancement are primarily techno-conservatives who, lacking any reasonable, systematic account of why we ought to be so opposed, simply resort to a sort of fear-mongering and anti-meliorism. This dissertation means to counteract said bias by offering just such an account.

Reuse Permissions
  • 834.63 KB application/pdf

    Download count: 0

    Details

    Contributors
    Date Created
    • 2012
    Resource Type
  • Text
  • Collections this item is in
    Note
    • Partial requirement for: Ph. D., Arizona State University, 2012
      Note type
      thesis
    • Includes bibliographical references (p. 201-206)
      Note type
      bibliography
    • Field of study: Philosophy

    Citation and reuse

    Statement of Responsibility

    by Valerye Michelle Milleson

    Machine-readable links