Description

Hypotheses on the benefits of the practice of partible paternity are tested using demographic data for Ache foragers of Paraguay. Partible paternity refers to the institution of multiple males considered to contribute to the conception of a single offspring. Analyses

Hypotheses on the benefits of the practice of partible paternity are tested using demographic data for Ache foragers of Paraguay. Partible paternity refers to the institution of multiple males considered to contribute to the conception of a single offspring. Analyses focus on patterns of primary and secondary co-fatherhood among men, genealogical relationships between co-fathers, and relation between band co-residence and co-fatherhood. Results indicate that men who had more secondary fatherhood also had more primary fatherhood; co-fathers are more closely related, on average, than men who are not co-fathers; and co-fathers were also more likely to reside together than men who were not co-fathers, even after controlling for relatedness. Results are most consistent with women choosing co-fathers of offspring in ways that maximize likelihood and amount of investment (multiple investors hypothesis) and men competing for more mates with at least partially affiliative outcomes (mate competition and male alliance hypotheses).

Downloads
pdf (255.8 KB)

Details

Title
  • Relatedness, Co-Residence, and Shared Fatherhood Among Ache Foragers of Paraguay
Contributors
Date Created
2014-10-01
Resource Type
  • Text
  • Collections this item is in
    Identifier
    • Digital object identifier: 10.1086/678324
    • Identifier Type
      International standard serial number
      Identifier Value
      1708-3087
    Note

    Citation and reuse

    Cite this item

    This is a suggested citation. Consult the appropriate style guide for specific citation guidelines.

    Ellsworth, Ryan M., Bailey, Drew H., Hill, Kim R., Hurtado, A. Magdalena, & Walker, Robert S. (2014). Relatedness, Co-residence, and Shared Fatherhood among Ache Foragers of Paraguay. CURRENT ANTHROPOLOGY, 55(5), 647-653. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/678324

    Machine-readable links